活髓疗法治疗恒牙龋髓损伤的疗效:开放标签随机对照非劣效性试验的研究方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08559-y
Qian Zeng, Mingchang Chen, Siyi Zheng, Xi Wei, Hongyan Liu
{"title":"活髓疗法治疗恒牙龋髓损伤的疗效:开放标签随机对照非劣效性试验的研究方案。","authors":"Qian Zeng, Mingchang Chen, Siyi Zheng, Xi Wei, Hongyan Liu","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08559-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vital pulp therapy (VPT) has recently been reported as an effective approach for preventing and treating carious pulp injury in permanent teeth. Compared with root canal treatment (RCT), which involves complete removal of the pulp tissue, VPT effectively maintains pulp vitality and retains the physiological functions of the pulp. In the research pool, large-scale randomized controlled trials evaluating the treatment outcome of VPT using calcium silicate cements and RCT in cariously exposed permanent teeth are lacking. Here, we present a monocentric clinical protocol to compare the effects of VPT using iRoot BP Plus (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, BC, Canada) as a pulp-capping material with RCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed trial is an open-label, single-centre, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. In total, 462 patients will be included in this trial according to the following criteria: adult patients (18-50 years old), pulp exposure during the treatment of deep caries in mature permanent teeth, a diagnosis of reversible or partially irreversible pulpitis without apical translucency on X-ray, without periodontitis or systemic disease. Patients with signed informed consent forms will be enrolled and randomly divided into two groups (VPT and RCT) with a balanced treatment allocation (1:1). Clinical evaluations will be conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, with the potential for extension. The primary outcome measure will be the duration of success. The secondary outcomes will include the success rate at the 1-year follow-up and any adverse reactions. The Kaplan‒Meier method and log-rank test will be used to compare the duration of success of both treatments. For other outcomes, the χ<sup>2</sup> test or Fisher's exact test will be used for categorical variables, and the t test or Mann‒Whitney U test will be used for continuous variables to assess the differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of this trial will provide a clinical reference for selecting treatments for carious pulp injuries in permanent teeth.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2100051369. The study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ( www.chictr.org.cn ). Registered on 21 September 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of vital pulp therapy for carious pulp injury in permanent teeth: a study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled noninferiority trial.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Zeng, Mingchang Chen, Siyi Zheng, Xi Wei, Hongyan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08559-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vital pulp therapy (VPT) has recently been reported as an effective approach for preventing and treating carious pulp injury in permanent teeth. Compared with root canal treatment (RCT), which involves complete removal of the pulp tissue, VPT effectively maintains pulp vitality and retains the physiological functions of the pulp. In the research pool, large-scale randomized controlled trials evaluating the treatment outcome of VPT using calcium silicate cements and RCT in cariously exposed permanent teeth are lacking. Here, we present a monocentric clinical protocol to compare the effects of VPT using iRoot BP Plus (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, BC, Canada) as a pulp-capping material with RCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed trial is an open-label, single-centre, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. In total, 462 patients will be included in this trial according to the following criteria: adult patients (18-50 years old), pulp exposure during the treatment of deep caries in mature permanent teeth, a diagnosis of reversible or partially irreversible pulpitis without apical translucency on X-ray, without periodontitis or systemic disease. Patients with signed informed consent forms will be enrolled and randomly divided into two groups (VPT and RCT) with a balanced treatment allocation (1:1). Clinical evaluations will be conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, with the potential for extension. The primary outcome measure will be the duration of success. The secondary outcomes will include the success rate at the 1-year follow-up and any adverse reactions. The Kaplan‒Meier method and log-rank test will be used to compare the duration of success of both treatments. For other outcomes, the χ<sup>2</sup> test or Fisher's exact test will be used for categorical variables, and the t test or Mann‒Whitney U test will be used for continuous variables to assess the differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of this trial will provide a clinical reference for selecting treatments for carious pulp injuries in permanent teeth.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2100051369. The study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ( www.chictr.org.cn ). Registered on 21 September 2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492771/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08559-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08559-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近有报道称,活力牙髓疗法(VPT)是预防和治疗恒牙龋髓损伤的有效方法。与完全去除牙髓组织的根管治疗(RCT)相比,VPT 能有效保持牙髓的活力,保留牙髓的生理功能。在研究资料库中,还缺乏大规模的随机对照试验来评估使用硅酸钙水门汀和 RCT 对龋坏暴露的恒牙进行 VPT 的治疗效果。在此,我们提出一个单中心临床方案,比较使用 iRoot BP Plus(Innovative Bioceramix,加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市)作为牙髓覆盖材料的 VPT 与 RCT 的效果:拟议的试验是一项开放标签、单中心、随机对照、非劣效试验。根据以下标准,共有 462 名患者将被纳入该试验:成年患者(18-50 岁),在治疗成熟恒牙深龋时牙髓暴露,诊断为可逆或部分不可逆性牙髓炎,X 光检查无根尖透亮,无牙周炎或全身性疾病。患者在签署知情同意书后,将被随机分为两组(VPT 和 RCT),治疗分配比例为 1:1。临床评估将在基线和治疗后 3、6、12 和 24 个月进行,并有可能延长。主要结果指标是治疗成功的持续时间。次要结果包括 1 年随访时的成功率和任何不良反应。将采用卡普兰-梅耶法和对数秩检验比较两种疗法的成功持续时间。对于其他结果,分类变量将采用χ2检验或费雪精确检验,连续变量将采用t检验或曼惠尼U检验来评估组间差异:本试验的结果将为恒牙龋髓损伤治疗方法的选择提供临床参考:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2100051369。该研究已在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR) ( www.chictr.org.cn ) 注册。注册日期为 2021 年 9 月 21 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of vital pulp therapy for carious pulp injury in permanent teeth: a study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled noninferiority trial.

Background: Vital pulp therapy (VPT) has recently been reported as an effective approach for preventing and treating carious pulp injury in permanent teeth. Compared with root canal treatment (RCT), which involves complete removal of the pulp tissue, VPT effectively maintains pulp vitality and retains the physiological functions of the pulp. In the research pool, large-scale randomized controlled trials evaluating the treatment outcome of VPT using calcium silicate cements and RCT in cariously exposed permanent teeth are lacking. Here, we present a monocentric clinical protocol to compare the effects of VPT using iRoot BP Plus (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, BC, Canada) as a pulp-capping material with RCT.

Methods: The proposed trial is an open-label, single-centre, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. In total, 462 patients will be included in this trial according to the following criteria: adult patients (18-50 years old), pulp exposure during the treatment of deep caries in mature permanent teeth, a diagnosis of reversible or partially irreversible pulpitis without apical translucency on X-ray, without periodontitis or systemic disease. Patients with signed informed consent forms will be enrolled and randomly divided into two groups (VPT and RCT) with a balanced treatment allocation (1:1). Clinical evaluations will be conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, with the potential for extension. The primary outcome measure will be the duration of success. The secondary outcomes will include the success rate at the 1-year follow-up and any adverse reactions. The Kaplan‒Meier method and log-rank test will be used to compare the duration of success of both treatments. For other outcomes, the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test will be used for categorical variables, and the t test or Mann‒Whitney U test will be used for continuous variables to assess the differences between groups.

Discussion: The results of this trial will provide a clinical reference for selecting treatments for carious pulp injuries in permanent teeth.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2100051369. The study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ( www.chictr.org.cn ). Registered on 21 September 2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
High-concentrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus placebo in osteoarthritis in the thumb base: study protocol for an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Care bundles to improve enteral nutrition management in stroke patients: study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. Clinical efficacy and safety of the superpulse thulium fiber laser and holmium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized, positive control, blinded, single-center clinical study {1}. Influenza vaccination in patients with acute heart failure (PANDA II): study protocol for a hospital-based, parallel-group, cluster randomized controlled trial in China. Intracoronary administration of tenecteplase to prevent PCI-related myocardial infarction in patients with echo-attenuated coronary plaques: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1