Mario de Angelis, Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello, Carolin Siech, Andrea Baudo, Francesco Di Bello, Jordan A Goyal, Zhe Tian, Nicola Longo, Ottavio de Cobelli, Felix K H Chun, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F Shariat, Luca Carmignani, Giorgio Gandaglia, Marco Moschini, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Pierre I Karakiewicz
{"title":"器官封闭型和非器官封闭型尿路上皮癌患者根治性膀胱切除术前的新辅助化疗。","authors":"Mario de Angelis, Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello, Carolin Siech, Andrea Baudo, Francesco Di Bello, Jordan A Goyal, Zhe Tian, Nicola Longo, Ottavio de Cobelli, Felix K H Chun, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F Shariat, Luca Carmignani, Giorgio Gandaglia, Marco Moschini, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Pierre I Karakiewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) is guideline-recommended in patients with cT2-T4N0M0 urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (UCUB). However, no population-based study validated the survival benefit of NAC recorded in clinical trials in a stage-specific fashion. We addressed this knowledge gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2007-2020), we identified patients with cT2-T4N0M0 UCUB treated with NAC before RC versus RC alone. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. Survival analyses were performed according to organ confined (OC: cT2N0M0) versus nonorgan confined stages (NOC: cT3-T4N0M0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,743 assessable patients, 1,020 (27%) underwent NAC versus 2,723 (73%) RC alone. NAC rates increased over time in OC stage (EAPC = 11.9%, P < 0.001) and NOC stage (EAPC = 8.6%, P < 0.001). In OC stage, cumulative incidence plots derived 5-year CSM was 15.6% in NAC and 19.9% in RC alone patients (P = 0.008). In multivariable CRR models, NAC independently predicted lower CSM (hazard ratio (HR): 0.74, P = 0.01). Similarly, in NOC stage, cumulative incidence plots derived 5-year CSM was 36.1% in NAC and 46.0% in RC alone patients (P = 0.01). In multivariable CRR models, NAC independently predicted lower CSM (HR: 0.66, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NAC is associated with improved CSM compared to RC alone, both in OC and NOC stages. Specifically, the magnitude of the protective NAC effect was greater in NOC than OC patients. Thus, NAC should always be administered in all eligible patients before RC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy in patients with organ-confined and non-organ-confined urothelial carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Mario de Angelis, Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello, Carolin Siech, Andrea Baudo, Francesco Di Bello, Jordan A Goyal, Zhe Tian, Nicola Longo, Ottavio de Cobelli, Felix K H Chun, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F Shariat, Luca Carmignani, Giorgio Gandaglia, Marco Moschini, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Pierre I Karakiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) is guideline-recommended in patients with cT2-T4N0M0 urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (UCUB). However, no population-based study validated the survival benefit of NAC recorded in clinical trials in a stage-specific fashion. We addressed this knowledge gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2007-2020), we identified patients with cT2-T4N0M0 UCUB treated with NAC before RC versus RC alone. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. Survival analyses were performed according to organ confined (OC: cT2N0M0) versus nonorgan confined stages (NOC: cT3-T4N0M0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,743 assessable patients, 1,020 (27%) underwent NAC versus 2,723 (73%) RC alone. NAC rates increased over time in OC stage (EAPC = 11.9%, P < 0.001) and NOC stage (EAPC = 8.6%, P < 0.001). In OC stage, cumulative incidence plots derived 5-year CSM was 15.6% in NAC and 19.9% in RC alone patients (P = 0.008). In multivariable CRR models, NAC independently predicted lower CSM (hazard ratio (HR): 0.74, P = 0.01). Similarly, in NOC stage, cumulative incidence plots derived 5-year CSM was 36.1% in NAC and 46.0% in RC alone patients (P = 0.01). In multivariable CRR models, NAC independently predicted lower CSM (HR: 0.66, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NAC is associated with improved CSM compared to RC alone, both in OC and NOC stages. Specifically, the magnitude of the protective NAC effect was greater in NOC than OC patients. Thus, NAC should always be administered in all eligible patients before RC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy in patients with organ-confined and non-organ-confined urothelial carcinoma.
Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) is guideline-recommended in patients with cT2-T4N0M0 urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (UCUB). However, no population-based study validated the survival benefit of NAC recorded in clinical trials in a stage-specific fashion. We addressed this knowledge gap.
Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2007-2020), we identified patients with cT2-T4N0M0 UCUB treated with NAC before RC versus RC alone. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. Survival analyses were performed according to organ confined (OC: cT2N0M0) versus nonorgan confined stages (NOC: cT3-T4N0M0).
Results: Of 3,743 assessable patients, 1,020 (27%) underwent NAC versus 2,723 (73%) RC alone. NAC rates increased over time in OC stage (EAPC = 11.9%, P < 0.001) and NOC stage (EAPC = 8.6%, P < 0.001). In OC stage, cumulative incidence plots derived 5-year CSM was 15.6% in NAC and 19.9% in RC alone patients (P = 0.008). In multivariable CRR models, NAC independently predicted lower CSM (hazard ratio (HR): 0.74, P = 0.01). Similarly, in NOC stage, cumulative incidence plots derived 5-year CSM was 36.1% in NAC and 46.0% in RC alone patients (P = 0.01). In multivariable CRR models, NAC independently predicted lower CSM (HR: 0.66, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: NAC is associated with improved CSM compared to RC alone, both in OC and NOC stages. Specifically, the magnitude of the protective NAC effect was greater in NOC than OC patients. Thus, NAC should always be administered in all eligible patients before RC.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.