盆腔器官保留根治性膀胱切除术与标准根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Gal Saffati, Eric Wahlstedt, Madeline Chaput, Sagar R Patel, Gustavo Salgado-Garza, Shane Kronstedt, Michal R Segall, Juan C Angulo-Lozano, Jeffrey A Jones, Jennifer M Taylor, Jeremy R Slawin
{"title":"盆腔器官保留根治性膀胱切除术与标准根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Gal Saffati, Eric Wahlstedt, Madeline Chaput, Sagar R Patel, Gustavo Salgado-Garza, Shane Kronstedt, Michal R Segall, Juan C Angulo-Lozano, Jeffrey A Jones, Jennifer M Taylor, Jeremy R Slawin","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Radical Cystectomy is indicated in muscle-invasive bladder cancer and select cases of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Women often undergo additional reproductive organ removal, greatly impacting sexual function and quality of life. Pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy aims to mitigate these effects, but its oncologic outcomes are not well-defined. This presents a meta-analysis of available literature on oncological outcomes of pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy in women with muscle invasive disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed to identify studies comparing oncological outcomes between pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy and standard radical cystectomy in women with muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk or recurrent nonmuscle invasive cancer. The search included English or Spanish studies, statistically comparing overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival. Statistical analysis used Review Manager, employing fixed or random-effects models based on heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Six retrospective studies met inclusion criteria, totaling 597 patients of which 303 received pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy and 294 received standard radical cystectomy. Overall Survival was not different between the 2 groups (HR 1.05 [0.77, 1.43]; P = 0.77). Cancer-Specific Survival also was found to be not different between the 2 groups (HR 1.27 [0.86, 1.87]; P = 0.22). Additionally, recurrence-free survival was not different between the 2 groups (HR 0.85 [0.41, 1.75]; P = 0.65. Four of the included studies exhibited a moderate risk of bias, with 1 study demonstrating low risk and the remaining study manifesting a serious risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The comparison showed no significant differences in overall survival, cancer-specific survival, or recurrence-free survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncologic outcomes of pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy vs. Standard radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Gal Saffati, Eric Wahlstedt, Madeline Chaput, Sagar R Patel, Gustavo Salgado-Garza, Shane Kronstedt, Michal R Segall, Juan C Angulo-Lozano, Jeffrey A Jones, Jennifer M Taylor, Jeremy R Slawin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Radical Cystectomy is indicated in muscle-invasive bladder cancer and select cases of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Women often undergo additional reproductive organ removal, greatly impacting sexual function and quality of life. Pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy aims to mitigate these effects, but its oncologic outcomes are not well-defined. This presents a meta-analysis of available literature on oncological outcomes of pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy in women with muscle invasive disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed to identify studies comparing oncological outcomes between pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy and standard radical cystectomy in women with muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk or recurrent nonmuscle invasive cancer. The search included English or Spanish studies, statistically comparing overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival. Statistical analysis used Review Manager, employing fixed or random-effects models based on heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Six retrospective studies met inclusion criteria, totaling 597 patients of which 303 received pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy and 294 received standard radical cystectomy. Overall Survival was not different between the 2 groups (HR 1.05 [0.77, 1.43]; P = 0.77). Cancer-Specific Survival also was found to be not different between the 2 groups (HR 1.27 [0.86, 1.87]; P = 0.22). Additionally, recurrence-free survival was not different between the 2 groups (HR 0.85 [0.41, 1.75]; P = 0.65. Four of the included studies exhibited a moderate risk of bias, with 1 study demonstrating low risk and the remaining study manifesting a serious risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The comparison showed no significant differences in overall survival, cancer-specific survival, or recurrence-free survival rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:根治性膀胱切除术适用于肌肉浸润性膀胱癌和部分非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌病例。女性通常要接受额外的生殖器官切除术,这极大地影响了性功能和生活质量。保留盆腔器官的根治性膀胱切除术旨在减轻这些影响,但其肿瘤学结果尚不明确。本文对现有文献进行了荟萃分析,分析了肌层浸润性疾病女性盆腔器官保留根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学结果:在PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Google Scholar上进行了系统性检索,以确定对患有肌层浸润性膀胱癌或高危或复发性非肌层浸润性癌症的女性患者进行盆腔器官保留根治性膀胱切除术和标准根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学结果进行比较的研究。检索包括英语或西班牙语研究,统计比较总生存率、癌症特异性生存率和无复发生存率。统计分析采用Review Manager,根据异质性采用固定或随机效应模型:六项回顾性研究符合纳入标准,共有597名患者,其中303人接受了保留盆腔器官的根治性膀胱切除术,294人接受了标准的根治性膀胱切除术。两组患者的总生存率没有差异(HR 1.05 [0.77, 1.43]; P = 0.77)。癌症特异性生存率在两组之间也无差异(HR 1.27 [0.86, 1.87];P = 0.22)。此外,两组患者的无复发生存率也无差异(HR 0.85 [0.41, 1.75];P = 0.65)。在纳入的研究中,4 项研究存在中度偏倚风险,1 项研究存在低度偏倚风险,其余研究存在严重偏倚风险:比较结果显示,总生存率、癌症特异性生存率和无复发生存率均无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oncologic outcomes of pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy vs. Standard radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and objective: Radical Cystectomy is indicated in muscle-invasive bladder cancer and select cases of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Women often undergo additional reproductive organ removal, greatly impacting sexual function and quality of life. Pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy aims to mitigate these effects, but its oncologic outcomes are not well-defined. This presents a meta-analysis of available literature on oncological outcomes of pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy in women with muscle invasive disease.

Methods: A systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed to identify studies comparing oncological outcomes between pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy and standard radical cystectomy in women with muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk or recurrent nonmuscle invasive cancer. The search included English or Spanish studies, statistically comparing overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival. Statistical analysis used Review Manager, employing fixed or random-effects models based on heterogeneity.

Key findings and limitations: Six retrospective studies met inclusion criteria, totaling 597 patients of which 303 received pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy and 294 received standard radical cystectomy. Overall Survival was not different between the 2 groups (HR 1.05 [0.77, 1.43]; P = 0.77). Cancer-Specific Survival also was found to be not different between the 2 groups (HR 1.27 [0.86, 1.87]; P = 0.22). Additionally, recurrence-free survival was not different between the 2 groups (HR 0.85 [0.41, 1.75]; P = 0.65. Four of the included studies exhibited a moderate risk of bias, with 1 study demonstrating low risk and the remaining study manifesting a serious risk of bias.

Conclusion: The comparison showed no significant differences in overall survival, cancer-specific survival, or recurrence-free survival rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Functional, oncological, regret and complications following partial gland cryo-ablation for low-risk prostate cancer associated with MPMRI targets. Cumulative smoking exposure impacts oncologic outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Impact of baseline PD-L1 status in BCG naive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer on outcomes and changes after BCG exposure. Safety and efficacy of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin instillation for superficial recurrence following bladder-sparing therapy of muscle invasive bladder cancer: A retrospective study. Reducing infectious complications and healthcare costs in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with single-dose cefmetazole and levofloxacin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1