日本接受系统治疗的不可切除或转移性尿路上皮癌患者的实际治疗模式和结果。

Shotaro Yasuoka, Toshihiko Minegishi, Shingo Kojima, Kotoba Okuyama, Toshiki Fukasawa, Mizuho Akahane, Hidetoshi Uenaka, Yuichiro Ito, Makito Miyake
{"title":"日本接受系统治疗的不可切除或转移性尿路上皮癌患者的实际治疗模式和结果。","authors":"Shotaro Yasuoka, Toshihiko Minegishi, Shingo Kojima, Kotoba Okuyama, Toshiki Fukasawa, Mizuho Akahane, Hidetoshi Uenaka, Yuichiro Ito, Makito Miyake","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has traditionally been the standard treatment for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Recently, the longstanding paradigm has changed with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates, such as pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin (EV). This longitudinal descriptive study aimed to identify real-world treatment patterns and assess the outcomes of patients with mUC between 2010 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with mUC who received first-line systemic therapy were identified from a Japanese electronic medical records database. A Sankey diagram was used to present the proportion of patients who transitioned to second- and third-line therapies. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 794 patients were included in this study. The median age of the patients was 73.0 years, and 72.9% were male. The most common primary tumor site was the bladder (59.7%). First-line therapy comprised cisplatin-based regimens in 52.0% of the patients (11.8% at standard doses, 32.4% at reduced doses, and 7.8% at unknown doses), carboplatin-based regimens in 32.1%, and other regimens in 15.9%. Among the patients enrolled after 2017, following the approval of pembrolizumab for mUC progressing after chemotherapy in Japan, 58.2% received pembrolizumab as second-line therapy, and 19.1% received EV monotherapy as third-line therapy. The median OS for the total population was 24.1 months, with patients enrolled between 2010 and 2016 having a shorter OS (21.1 months) than those enrolled between 2017 and 2022 (24.9 months). For patients with eGFRs of ≥60 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, the median OS was 24.1 and 23.8 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Platinum-based regimens, including reduced-dose cisplatin and carboplatin, remain the predominant first-line systemic therapies. Since 2017, pembrolizumab and EV have become widespread choices for second-line and subsequent treatments, gradually surpassing the previously prevalent platinum-based regimens. The introduction of these novel therapies might have prolonged the OS of patients with mUC. A plain language summary is available in this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving systemic therapy in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Shotaro Yasuoka, Toshihiko Minegishi, Shingo Kojima, Kotoba Okuyama, Toshiki Fukasawa, Mizuho Akahane, Hidetoshi Uenaka, Yuichiro Ito, Makito Miyake\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has traditionally been the standard treatment for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Recently, the longstanding paradigm has changed with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates, such as pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin (EV). This longitudinal descriptive study aimed to identify real-world treatment patterns and assess the outcomes of patients with mUC between 2010 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with mUC who received first-line systemic therapy were identified from a Japanese electronic medical records database. A Sankey diagram was used to present the proportion of patients who transitioned to second- and third-line therapies. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 794 patients were included in this study. The median age of the patients was 73.0 years, and 72.9% were male. The most common primary tumor site was the bladder (59.7%). First-line therapy comprised cisplatin-based regimens in 52.0% of the patients (11.8% at standard doses, 32.4% at reduced doses, and 7.8% at unknown doses), carboplatin-based regimens in 32.1%, and other regimens in 15.9%. Among the patients enrolled after 2017, following the approval of pembrolizumab for mUC progressing after chemotherapy in Japan, 58.2% received pembrolizumab as second-line therapy, and 19.1% received EV monotherapy as third-line therapy. The median OS for the total population was 24.1 months, with patients enrolled between 2010 and 2016 having a shorter OS (21.1 months) than those enrolled between 2017 and 2022 (24.9 months). For patients with eGFRs of ≥60 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, the median OS was 24.1 and 23.8 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Platinum-based regimens, including reduced-dose cisplatin and carboplatin, remain the predominant first-line systemic therapies. Since 2017, pembrolizumab and EV have become widespread choices for second-line and subsequent treatments, gradually surpassing the previously prevalent platinum-based regimens. The introduction of these novel therapies might have prolonged the OS of patients with mUC. A plain language summary is available in this article.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以顺铂为基础的化疗历来是治疗不可切除或转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)的标准疗法。最近,随着免疫检查点抑制剂和抗体药物共轭物(如 pembrolizumab 和 enfortumab vedotin (EV))的出现,这一长期存在的模式发生了改变。这项纵向描述性研究旨在确定真实世界的治疗模式,并评估2010年至2023年间mUC患者的治疗效果:方法:从日本电子病历数据库中识别出接受一线系统治疗的mUC患者。方法:从日本电子病历数据库中确定了接受一线系统治疗的mUC患者,并用桑基图显示了转为二线和三线治疗的患者比例。卡普兰-梅耶生存分析用于估算下一次治疗时间(TTNT)和总生存期(OS):本研究共纳入了 794 名患者。患者的中位年龄为 73.0 岁,72.9% 为男性。最常见的原发肿瘤部位是膀胱(59.7%)。52.0%的患者接受了顺铂为基础的一线治疗(11.8%为标准剂量,32.4%为减量剂量,7.8%为未知剂量),32.1%的患者接受了卡铂为基础的治疗,15.9%的患者接受了其他治疗。在日本批准pembrolizumab用于化疗后进展的mUC治疗后,2017年后入组的患者中,58.2%接受了pembrolizumab作为二线疗法,19.1%接受了EV单药作为三线疗法。总人群的中位OS为24.1个月,2010年至2016年间入组的患者OS(21.1个月)短于2017年至2022年间入组的患者(24.9个月)。对于eGFR≥60和2的患者,中位OS分别为24.1个月和23.8个月:以铂类为基础的治疗方案,包括减量顺铂和卡铂,仍然是最主要的一线系统疗法。自2017年以来,pembrolizumab和EV已成为二线及后续治疗的广泛选择,逐渐超越了之前流行的铂类方案。这些新型疗法的引入可能会延长mUC患者的OS。本文提供了一份通俗易懂的摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving systemic therapy in Japan.

Background: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has traditionally been the standard treatment for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Recently, the longstanding paradigm has changed with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates, such as pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin (EV). This longitudinal descriptive study aimed to identify real-world treatment patterns and assess the outcomes of patients with mUC between 2010 and 2023.

Methods: Patients with mUC who received first-line systemic therapy were identified from a Japanese electronic medical records database. A Sankey diagram was used to present the proportion of patients who transitioned to second- and third-line therapies. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS).

Results: A total of 794 patients were included in this study. The median age of the patients was 73.0 years, and 72.9% were male. The most common primary tumor site was the bladder (59.7%). First-line therapy comprised cisplatin-based regimens in 52.0% of the patients (11.8% at standard doses, 32.4% at reduced doses, and 7.8% at unknown doses), carboplatin-based regimens in 32.1%, and other regimens in 15.9%. Among the patients enrolled after 2017, following the approval of pembrolizumab for mUC progressing after chemotherapy in Japan, 58.2% received pembrolizumab as second-line therapy, and 19.1% received EV monotherapy as third-line therapy. The median OS for the total population was 24.1 months, with patients enrolled between 2010 and 2016 having a shorter OS (21.1 months) than those enrolled between 2017 and 2022 (24.9 months). For patients with eGFRs of ≥60 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the median OS was 24.1 and 23.8 months, respectively.

Conclusion: Platinum-based regimens, including reduced-dose cisplatin and carboplatin, remain the predominant first-line systemic therapies. Since 2017, pembrolizumab and EV have become widespread choices for second-line and subsequent treatments, gradually surpassing the previously prevalent platinum-based regimens. The introduction of these novel therapies might have prolonged the OS of patients with mUC. A plain language summary is available in this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
State of the Art: The Microbiome in Bladder Cancer. Corrigendum to "A 2-center review of histopathology of variants of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and their impact on clinical outcomes" [Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations Volume 42 (2024) 333.e15-333.e20]. Laparoscopic suture-free partial nephrectomy using argon-beam-coagulator: Surgical technique and outcomes of a single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1