影响接受内窥镜治疗泌尿系结石患者辐射量的因素。

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urolithiasis Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2
D D Sugrue, F Ryan, M Courtney, M Horan, M B Codd, L C McLoughlin, P E Lonergan, R P Manecksha
{"title":"影响接受内窥镜治疗泌尿系结石患者辐射量的因素。","authors":"D D Sugrue, F Ryan, M Courtney, M Horan, M B Codd, L C McLoughlin, P E Lonergan, R P Manecksha","doi":"10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopy, are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis. There is increasing concern regarding the cumulative radiation dose associated with medical imaging and its adverse effects. This study aimed to assess radiation exposure in patients undergoing endoscopic management of urolithiasis and to identify factors associated with increased exposure.A retrospective analysis of all consecutive symptomatic urolithiasis cases who underwent endoscopic surgery over a two-year period at a tertiary referral center was performed. The cumulative radiation dose was recorded per stone episode, and the effective dose (ED) then calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine the association between ED and patient, stone, and procedural characteristics.Between January 2020 and December 2021, 250 patients underwent endoscopic intervention for urolithiasis; 71% (n = 178) were male with a median age of 48 years (IQR 35-59). The median stone size was 6 mm (IQR, 5-8 mm) and the median stone volume was 110 mm<sup>3</sup> (IQR, 60-206 mm<sup>3</sup>). Most stones were located in the distal ureter (46%, n = 114). The median ED received per stone episode was 3.99 mSv (IQR 2.9-7 mSv). On multivariable analysis, BMI, number of CT scans performed, CT protocol used, and repeat procedures strongly predicted increased radiation dose (p < 0.01).It is important for urologists to consider the cumulative radiation dosage in patients with urolithiasis. Strategies to minimize exposure, such as avoiding re-imaging, low-dose CTs, and collimation of the region of interest with judicious magnification, should be considered during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"52 1","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting radiation exposure in patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis.\",\"authors\":\"D D Sugrue, F Ryan, M Courtney, M Horan, M B Codd, L C McLoughlin, P E Lonergan, R P Manecksha\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopy, are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis. There is increasing concern regarding the cumulative radiation dose associated with medical imaging and its adverse effects. This study aimed to assess radiation exposure in patients undergoing endoscopic management of urolithiasis and to identify factors associated with increased exposure.A retrospective analysis of all consecutive symptomatic urolithiasis cases who underwent endoscopic surgery over a two-year period at a tertiary referral center was performed. The cumulative radiation dose was recorded per stone episode, and the effective dose (ED) then calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine the association between ED and patient, stone, and procedural characteristics.Between January 2020 and December 2021, 250 patients underwent endoscopic intervention for urolithiasis; 71% (n = 178) were male with a median age of 48 years (IQR 35-59). The median stone size was 6 mm (IQR, 5-8 mm) and the median stone volume was 110 mm<sup>3</sup> (IQR, 60-206 mm<sup>3</sup>). Most stones were located in the distal ureter (46%, n = 114). The median ED received per stone episode was 3.99 mSv (IQR 2.9-7 mSv). On multivariable analysis, BMI, number of CT scans performed, CT protocol used, and repeat procedures strongly predicted increased radiation dose (p < 0.01).It is important for urologists to consider the cumulative radiation dosage in patients with urolithiasis. Strategies to minimize exposure, such as avoiding re-imaging, low-dose CTs, and collimation of the region of interest with judicious magnification, should be considered during treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算机断层扫描(CT)和透视等成像技术对于诊断和治疗尿路结石至关重要。人们越来越关注医学成像的累积辐射剂量及其不良影响。这项研究旨在评估接受内镜治疗的尿路结石患者的辐射量,并找出与辐射量增加相关的因素。研究人员对一家三级转诊中心两年内接受内镜手术的所有连续性无症状尿路结石病例进行了回顾性分析。记录了每次结石发作的累积辐射剂量,然后计算出有效剂量(ED)。2020年1月至2021年12月期间,250名患者接受了内镜手术治疗尿路结石;71%(n = 178)为男性,中位年龄为48岁(IQR 35-59)。结石大小中位数为 6 毫米(IQR,5-8 毫米),结石体积中位数为 110 立方毫米(IQR,60-206 立方毫米)。大多数结石位于输尿管远端(46%,n = 114)。每次结石发作的 ED 中位数为 3.99 mSv(IQR 2.9-7 mSv)。在多变量分析中,体重指数(BMI)、CT 扫描次数、使用的 CT 方案和重复手术强烈预示着辐射剂量的增加(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors affecting radiation exposure in patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis.

Imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopy, are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis. There is increasing concern regarding the cumulative radiation dose associated with medical imaging and its adverse effects. This study aimed to assess radiation exposure in patients undergoing endoscopic management of urolithiasis and to identify factors associated with increased exposure.A retrospective analysis of all consecutive symptomatic urolithiasis cases who underwent endoscopic surgery over a two-year period at a tertiary referral center was performed. The cumulative radiation dose was recorded per stone episode, and the effective dose (ED) then calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine the association between ED and patient, stone, and procedural characteristics.Between January 2020 and December 2021, 250 patients underwent endoscopic intervention for urolithiasis; 71% (n = 178) were male with a median age of 48 years (IQR 35-59). The median stone size was 6 mm (IQR, 5-8 mm) and the median stone volume was 110 mm3 (IQR, 60-206 mm3). Most stones were located in the distal ureter (46%, n = 114). The median ED received per stone episode was 3.99 mSv (IQR 2.9-7 mSv). On multivariable analysis, BMI, number of CT scans performed, CT protocol used, and repeat procedures strongly predicted increased radiation dose (p < 0.01).It is important for urologists to consider the cumulative radiation dosage in patients with urolithiasis. Strategies to minimize exposure, such as avoiding re-imaging, low-dose CTs, and collimation of the region of interest with judicious magnification, should be considered during treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
Identifying therapeutic targets for kidney stone disease through proteome-wide Mendelian randomization and colocalization analysis. Potential impacts to human health from climate change: A comparative life-cycle assessment of single-use versus reusable devices flexible ureteroscopes. Association between the systemic inflammation response index and kidney stones in US adults: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007-2018. Comprehensive analysis and validation of TP73 as a biomarker for calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis using machine learning and in vivo and in vitro experiments. Quadruple-D score in the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones in pediatric population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1