作为外周动脉疾病患者预后生物标志物的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1177/1358863X241281699
Roy B Kurniawan, Paulus P Siahaan, Pandit Bt Saputra, Jannatin N Arnindita, Cornelia G Savitri, Novia N Faizah, Luqman H Andira, Mario D'Oria, J Nugroho Eko Putranto, Firas F Alkaff
{"title":"作为外周动脉疾病患者预后生物标志物的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Roy B Kurniawan, Paulus P Siahaan, Pandit Bt Saputra, Jannatin N Arnindita, Cornelia G Savitri, Novia N Faizah, Luqman H Andira, Mario D'Oria, J Nugroho Eko Putranto, Firas F Alkaff","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241281699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and routinely obtained parameter reflecting systemic inflammation, including in peripheral artery disease (PAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review aimed to assess the role of NLR as a prognostic biomarker in patients with PAD. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, EBSCO, and Cochrane. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool risk ratios, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A bivariate model was used to generate summary receiver operating characteristics with the corresponding area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 5243 patients with PAD from nine eligible studies. High NLR corresponded to at least a twofold increased risk of all-cause mortality (ACM), major adverse limb events (MALE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). NLR's performance was good for predicting 1-year ACM (AUC 0.71 [95% CI: 0.59-0.79], sensitivity 58.2% [95% CI: 45.3-71.0], specificity 72.6% [95% CI: 65.6-79.62], PPV 41.0% [95% CI: 31.2-50.7], NPV 82.7% [95% CI: 74.1-91.3]) and 1-year MALE (AUC 0.78 [95% CI: 0.75-0.80], sensitivity 65.4% [95% CI: 41.6-89.2], specificity 77.7% [95% CI: 71.0-84.3], PPV 53.7% [95% CI: 47.3-60.1], NPV 83.91% [95% CI: 73.2-94.6]). However, these values tended to decrease as the follow-up duration extended, except for the pooled specificities, which exhibited the opposite pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLR emerges as a simple and cost-effective prognostic biomarker with decent performance for poor outcomes in patients with PAD <b>(PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42023486607)</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X241281699"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in patients with peripheral artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Roy B Kurniawan, Paulus P Siahaan, Pandit Bt Saputra, Jannatin N Arnindita, Cornelia G Savitri, Novia N Faizah, Luqman H Andira, Mario D'Oria, J Nugroho Eko Putranto, Firas F Alkaff\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1358863X241281699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and routinely obtained parameter reflecting systemic inflammation, including in peripheral artery disease (PAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review aimed to assess the role of NLR as a prognostic biomarker in patients with PAD. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, EBSCO, and Cochrane. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool risk ratios, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A bivariate model was used to generate summary receiver operating characteristics with the corresponding area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 5243 patients with PAD from nine eligible studies. High NLR corresponded to at least a twofold increased risk of all-cause mortality (ACM), major adverse limb events (MALE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). NLR's performance was good for predicting 1-year ACM (AUC 0.71 [95% CI: 0.59-0.79], sensitivity 58.2% [95% CI: 45.3-71.0], specificity 72.6% [95% CI: 65.6-79.62], PPV 41.0% [95% CI: 31.2-50.7], NPV 82.7% [95% CI: 74.1-91.3]) and 1-year MALE (AUC 0.78 [95% CI: 0.75-0.80], sensitivity 65.4% [95% CI: 41.6-89.2], specificity 77.7% [95% CI: 71.0-84.3], PPV 53.7% [95% CI: 47.3-60.1], NPV 83.91% [95% CI: 73.2-94.6]). However, these values tended to decrease as the follow-up duration extended, except for the pooled specificities, which exhibited the opposite pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLR emerges as a simple and cost-effective prognostic biomarker with decent performance for poor outcomes in patients with PAD <b>(PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42023486607)</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1358863X241281699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241281699\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241281699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)是反映全身炎症(包括外周动脉疾病(PAD))的一个简单而常规的参数:本系统综述旨在评估 NLR 作为 PAD 患者预后生物标志物的作用。我们在 PubMed、ScienceDirect、Web of Science、Scopus、ProQuest、EBSCO 和 Cochrane 上进行了系统检索。采用随机效应荟萃分析法汇集风险比、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。使用双变量模型生成接收者操作特征概要及相应的曲线下面积(AUC):该研究纳入了九项合格研究中的 5243 名 PAD 患者。高 NLR 意味着全因死亡率(ACM)、主要不良肢体事件(MALE)和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的风险至少增加两倍。NLR 在预测 1 年 ACM 方面表现良好(AUC 0.71 [95% CI: 0.59-0.79],灵敏度 58.2% [95% CI: 45.3-71.0],特异性 72.6% [95% CI: 65.6-79.62],PPV 41.0% [95% CI: 31.2-50.7],NPV 82.7%[95%CI:74.1-91.3])和 1 年 MALE(AUC 0.78 [95% CI:0.75-0.80],灵敏度 65.4% [95% CI:41.6-89.2],特异性 77.7% [95% CI:71.0-84.3],PPV 53.7% [95% CI:47.3-60.1],NPV 83.91% [95% CI:73.2-94.6])。然而,随着随访时间的延长,这些数值呈下降趋势,但汇总特异性除外,其表现出相反的模式:结论:NLR是一种简单且经济有效的预后生物标志物,对于PAD患者的不良预后具有良好的表现(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023486607)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in patients with peripheral artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and routinely obtained parameter reflecting systemic inflammation, including in peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Methods: This systematic review aimed to assess the role of NLR as a prognostic biomarker in patients with PAD. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, EBSCO, and Cochrane. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool risk ratios, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A bivariate model was used to generate summary receiver operating characteristics with the corresponding area under the curve (AUC).

Results: This review included 5243 patients with PAD from nine eligible studies. High NLR corresponded to at least a twofold increased risk of all-cause mortality (ACM), major adverse limb events (MALE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). NLR's performance was good for predicting 1-year ACM (AUC 0.71 [95% CI: 0.59-0.79], sensitivity 58.2% [95% CI: 45.3-71.0], specificity 72.6% [95% CI: 65.6-79.62], PPV 41.0% [95% CI: 31.2-50.7], NPV 82.7% [95% CI: 74.1-91.3]) and 1-year MALE (AUC 0.78 [95% CI: 0.75-0.80], sensitivity 65.4% [95% CI: 41.6-89.2], specificity 77.7% [95% CI: 71.0-84.3], PPV 53.7% [95% CI: 47.3-60.1], NPV 83.91% [95% CI: 73.2-94.6]). However, these values tended to decrease as the follow-up duration extended, except for the pooled specificities, which exhibited the opposite pattern.

Conclusion: NLR emerges as a simple and cost-effective prognostic biomarker with decent performance for poor outcomes in patients with PAD (PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42023486607).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular Medicine
Vascular Medicine 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The premier, ISI-ranked journal of vascular medicine. Integrates the latest research in vascular biology with advancements for the practice of vascular medicine and vascular surgery. It features original research and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for vascular disease. A member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Mid-term effect of customized graduated elastic compression stockings for managing occupational edema: A randomized controlled trial. Lack of diversity in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting: Implications for the Distressed Community Index. Defining patient goals for therapy in peripheral artery disease: A need for collaborative science. Highlights from the 2024 SVM Vascular Scientific Sessions. Benefits of prophylactic carotid revascularization in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: A narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1