{"title":"高剂量维生素 D 补充剂与索利那新或标准泌尿疗法治疗儿童干性膀胱过度活动症的疗效对比:随机临床试验的二次分析。","authors":"Hongsong Chen, Zhicheng Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Chong Wang, Zhenmin Liu, Zihan Ye, Xiao Wang, Yanxi Wang, Xing Liu, Guanghui Wei","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05296-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of high-dose vitamin D supplementation (VDS) plus standard urotherapy (SU) in managing pediatric overactive bladder dry (OAB-dry), specifically in children with (1) vitamin D levels between 20 and 35 ng/mL and (2) heightened baseline symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, eligible children (n = 303) were assigned to 8 weeks of VDS + SU group, solifenacin (SOL) + SU group, or SU alone group. The primary outcome was voiding frequency; secondary outcomes included urgency, nocturia, quality of life (QoL), pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms scores, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 303 participants, 197 (65%) had vitamin D levels between 20 and 35 ng/mL, and 119 (39%) exhibited heightened baseline symptom severity. In both subgroups, VDS + SU resulted in significantly greater improvements in voiding frequency compared to SOL + SU and SU alone. In the vitamin D subgroup (20-35 ng/mL), the median difference in voids/day between VDS + SU and SOL + SU was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.0; P = 0.003) and 3.2 compared to SU alone (P < 0.001). In the heightened symptom subgroup, the median difference was 3.0 (95% CI, 2.0 to 4.0; P < 0.001) vs. SOL + SU and 5.0 (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.0; P < 0.001) vs. SU alone. The VDS + SU group generally outperformed the other groups in various secondary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-dose VDS plus SU has significant therapeutic benefit in children with OAB-dry in those with vitamin D levels between 20 and 35 ng/mL and with more severe symptoms, compared to SOL + SU or SU alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of high-dose vitamin D supplementation vs. solifenacin or standard urotherapy for overactive bladder dry in children: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hongsong Chen, Zhicheng Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Chong Wang, Zhenmin Liu, Zihan Ye, Xiao Wang, Yanxi Wang, Xing Liu, Guanghui Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-024-05296-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of high-dose vitamin D supplementation (VDS) plus standard urotherapy (SU) in managing pediatric overactive bladder dry (OAB-dry), specifically in children with (1) vitamin D levels between 20 and 35 ng/mL and (2) heightened baseline symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, eligible children (n = 303) were assigned to 8 weeks of VDS + SU group, solifenacin (SOL) + SU group, or SU alone group. The primary outcome was voiding frequency; secondary outcomes included urgency, nocturia, quality of life (QoL), pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms scores, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 303 participants, 197 (65%) had vitamin D levels between 20 and 35 ng/mL, and 119 (39%) exhibited heightened baseline symptom severity. In both subgroups, VDS + SU resulted in significantly greater improvements in voiding frequency compared to SOL + SU and SU alone. In the vitamin D subgroup (20-35 ng/mL), the median difference in voids/day between VDS + SU and SOL + SU was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.0; P = 0.003) and 3.2 compared to SU alone (P < 0.001). In the heightened symptom subgroup, the median difference was 3.0 (95% CI, 2.0 to 4.0; P < 0.001) vs. SOL + SU and 5.0 (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.0; P < 0.001) vs. SU alone. The VDS + SU group generally outperformed the other groups in various secondary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-dose VDS plus SU has significant therapeutic benefit in children with OAB-dry in those with vitamin D levels between 20 and 35 ng/mL and with more severe symptoms, compared to SOL + SU or SU alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05296-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05296-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究高剂量维生素D补充剂(VDS)加标准尿路治疗(SU)在治疗小儿干性膀胱过度活动症(OAB-dry)方面的疗效,尤其是针对(1)维生素D水平介于20至35纳克/毫升之间和(2)基线症状严重程度升高的儿童:在这项随机对照试验的二次分析中,符合条件的儿童(n = 303)被分配到为期 8 周的 VDS + SU 组、索利非那新 (SOL) + SU 组或单用 SU 组。主要结果是排尿次数;次要结果包括尿急、夜尿、生活质量(QoL)、小儿下尿路症状评分和患者满意度:在303名参与者中,197人(65%)的维生素D水平介于20至35纳克/毫升之间,119人(39%)的基线症状严重程度较高。在这两个亚组中,VDS + SU 与 SOL + SU 和单独使用 SU 相比,排尿频率的改善幅度更大。在维生素 D 亚组(20-35 纳克/毫升)中,VDS + SU 与 SOL + SU 相比,排尿次数/天的中位数差异为 2.0(95% CI,1.0 至 3.0;P = 0.003),与单独使用 SU 相比,差异为 3.2(P 结论:在维生素 D 亚组中,VDS + SU 与 SOL + SU 相比,排尿次数/天的中位数差异为 2.0(95% CI,1.0 至 3.0;P = 0.003):与 SOL + SU 或单用 SU 相比,大剂量 VDS + SU 对维生素 D 水平在 20 至 35 纳克/毫升之间且症状较严重的干性 OAB 患儿有显著的治疗效果。
Efficacy of high-dose vitamin D supplementation vs. solifenacin or standard urotherapy for overactive bladder dry in children: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of high-dose vitamin D supplementation (VDS) plus standard urotherapy (SU) in managing pediatric overactive bladder dry (OAB-dry), specifically in children with (1) vitamin D levels between 20 and 35 ng/mL and (2) heightened baseline symptom severity.
Methods: In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, eligible children (n = 303) were assigned to 8 weeks of VDS + SU group, solifenacin (SOL) + SU group, or SU alone group. The primary outcome was voiding frequency; secondary outcomes included urgency, nocturia, quality of life (QoL), pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms scores, and patient satisfaction.
Results: Among 303 participants, 197 (65%) had vitamin D levels between 20 and 35 ng/mL, and 119 (39%) exhibited heightened baseline symptom severity. In both subgroups, VDS + SU resulted in significantly greater improvements in voiding frequency compared to SOL + SU and SU alone. In the vitamin D subgroup (20-35 ng/mL), the median difference in voids/day between VDS + SU and SOL + SU was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.0; P = 0.003) and 3.2 compared to SU alone (P < 0.001). In the heightened symptom subgroup, the median difference was 3.0 (95% CI, 2.0 to 4.0; P < 0.001) vs. SOL + SU and 5.0 (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.0; P < 0.001) vs. SU alone. The VDS + SU group generally outperformed the other groups in various secondary outcome measures.
Conclusion: High-dose VDS plus SU has significant therapeutic benefit in children with OAB-dry in those with vitamin D levels between 20 and 35 ng/mL and with more severe symptoms, compared to SOL + SU or SU alone.
期刊介绍:
The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.