Amit Bahl, Hanna Sodatonou, Robert Snjider, Andrew Chilelli, Alessandra Pranzo, Karla Martins, Axel Merseburger, Nigel Rozario, Danielle Crawley
{"title":"恩杂鲁胺与醋酸阿比特龙治疗转移性耐受性前列腺癌患者新发或恶化的2型糖尿病:EVADE研究。","authors":"Amit Bahl, Hanna Sodatonou, Robert Snjider, Andrew Chilelli, Alessandra Pranzo, Karla Martins, Axel Merseburger, Nigel Rozario, Danielle Crawley","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05280-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine new-onset or worsening T2DM risk in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving abiraterone acetate (AA) vs. enzalutamide (ENZA) in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of patients on AA and/or ENZA (2015-2021) were analysed retrospectively from UK- or England-wide databases and data sets. The primary endpoint was new-onset or worsening T2DM, analysed using a Cox model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1382 patients, 84 (6.1%) met the primary endpoint; 42 of 826 patients (5.1%) received ENZA and 42 of 556 patients (7.6%) received AA. Among patients without baseline T2DM (n = 1049), 50 developed new-onset T2DM: 24 (3.9%) on ENZA and 26 (5.9%) on AA. Among patients with baseline T2DM (n = 333), 34 (10.2%) had worsening T2DM: 18 (8.3%) on ENZA and 16 (13.8%) on AA. Patients on ENZA had longer median follow-up (445 vs. 408 days) and treatment duration (164 vs. 139 days) than those on AA, who were also more likely to have new-onset or worsening T2DM than those on ENZA (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4-2.7; P = 0.0101). The number needed to harm for an additional patient to experience new-onset or worsening T2DM when receiving AA instead of ENZA was 40 overall, 50 in patients without baseline T2DM, and 18 in patients with baseline T2DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with mCRPC receiving AA were more likely to experience new-onset or worsening T2DM than those on ENZA, despite having a shorter treatment duration. Further research is required to substantiate these findings in earlier disease settings with longer treatment duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enzalutamide versus abiraterone acetate in the development of new-onset or worsening type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: EVADE study.\",\"authors\":\"Amit Bahl, Hanna Sodatonou, Robert Snjider, Andrew Chilelli, Alessandra Pranzo, Karla Martins, Axel Merseburger, Nigel Rozario, Danielle Crawley\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-024-05280-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine new-onset or worsening T2DM risk in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving abiraterone acetate (AA) vs. enzalutamide (ENZA) in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of patients on AA and/or ENZA (2015-2021) were analysed retrospectively from UK- or England-wide databases and data sets. The primary endpoint was new-onset or worsening T2DM, analysed using a Cox model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1382 patients, 84 (6.1%) met the primary endpoint; 42 of 826 patients (5.1%) received ENZA and 42 of 556 patients (7.6%) received AA. Among patients without baseline T2DM (n = 1049), 50 developed new-onset T2DM: 24 (3.9%) on ENZA and 26 (5.9%) on AA. Among patients with baseline T2DM (n = 333), 34 (10.2%) had worsening T2DM: 18 (8.3%) on ENZA and 16 (13.8%) on AA. Patients on ENZA had longer median follow-up (445 vs. 408 days) and treatment duration (164 vs. 139 days) than those on AA, who were also more likely to have new-onset or worsening T2DM than those on ENZA (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4-2.7; P = 0.0101). The number needed to harm for an additional patient to experience new-onset or worsening T2DM when receiving AA instead of ENZA was 40 overall, 50 in patients without baseline T2DM, and 18 in patients with baseline T2DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with mCRPC receiving AA were more likely to experience new-onset or worsening T2DM than those on ENZA, despite having a shorter treatment duration. Further research is required to substantiate these findings in earlier disease settings with longer treatment duration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05280-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05280-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:确定英格兰接受醋酸阿比特龙(AA)与恩扎鲁胺(ENZA)治疗的转移性抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者新发或恶化T2DM的风险:从英国或英格兰范围内的数据库和数据集中回顾性分析了接受 AA 和/或 ENZA 治疗的患者记录(2015-2021 年)。主要终点是新发或恶化的 T2DM,采用 Cox 模型进行分析:在1382名患者中,84人(6.1%)达到了主要终点;826名患者中有42人(5.1%)接受了ENZA治疗,556名患者中有42人(7.6%)接受了AA治疗。在没有基线 T2DM 的患者(n = 1049)中,有 50 例新发 T2DM:24 例(3.9%)接受 ENZA 治疗,26 例(5.9%)接受 AA 治疗。在基线 T2DM 患者(n = 333)中,34 人(10.2%)的 T2DM 病情恶化:18 人(8.3%)服用 ENZA,16 人(13.8%)服用 AA。ENZA患者的中位随访时间(445天 vs. 408天)和治疗时间(164天 vs. 139天)均长于AA患者,而AA患者比ENZA患者更有可能出现新发或恶化的T2DM(HR:1.8;95% CI:1.4-2.7;P = 0.0101)。接受AA治疗而非ENZA治疗的患者中,发生T2DM新发或恶化的新增伤害所需人数总体为40人,无基线T2DM的患者为50人,有基线T2DM的患者为18人:结论:与接受ENZA治疗的患者相比,接受AA治疗的mCRPC患者更有可能出现新发或恶化的T2DM,尽管治疗时间更短。需要进一步研究,以便在治疗时间较长的早期疾病中证实这些发现。
Enzalutamide versus abiraterone acetate in the development of new-onset or worsening type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: EVADE study.
Purpose: To determine new-onset or worsening T2DM risk in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving abiraterone acetate (AA) vs. enzalutamide (ENZA) in England.
Methods: Records of patients on AA and/or ENZA (2015-2021) were analysed retrospectively from UK- or England-wide databases and data sets. The primary endpoint was new-onset or worsening T2DM, analysed using a Cox model.
Results: Of 1382 patients, 84 (6.1%) met the primary endpoint; 42 of 826 patients (5.1%) received ENZA and 42 of 556 patients (7.6%) received AA. Among patients without baseline T2DM (n = 1049), 50 developed new-onset T2DM: 24 (3.9%) on ENZA and 26 (5.9%) on AA. Among patients with baseline T2DM (n = 333), 34 (10.2%) had worsening T2DM: 18 (8.3%) on ENZA and 16 (13.8%) on AA. Patients on ENZA had longer median follow-up (445 vs. 408 days) and treatment duration (164 vs. 139 days) than those on AA, who were also more likely to have new-onset or worsening T2DM than those on ENZA (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4-2.7; P = 0.0101). The number needed to harm for an additional patient to experience new-onset or worsening T2DM when receiving AA instead of ENZA was 40 overall, 50 in patients without baseline T2DM, and 18 in patients with baseline T2DM.
Conclusion: Patients with mCRPC receiving AA were more likely to experience new-onset or worsening T2DM than those on ENZA, despite having a shorter treatment duration. Further research is required to substantiate these findings in earlier disease settings with longer treatment duration.
期刊介绍:
The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.