[不同年龄组出口梗阻性便秘患儿高分辨率肛门直肠测压特征对比分析]。

Q H Li, R F Wang, F M Xue, X Q Li
{"title":"[不同年龄组出口梗阻性便秘患儿高分辨率肛门直肠测压特征对比分析]。","authors":"Q H Li, R F Wang, F M Xue, X Q Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240516-01129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the characteristics of high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) in children with outlet obstructive constipation (OOC) in different age groups. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective inclusion of clinical data of functional constipation (FC) patients who underwent HR-ARM examination in the Department of Gastroenterology of Children's Hospital Affiliated of Zhengzhou University from January 2019 to September 2023 was conducted. The patients were divided into low age group (4 years old≤age<6 years) and high age group (6 years old≤age≤15 years old) according to age. They were divided into OOC group (the pediatric patients with uncoordinated pelvic floor muscle contractions, insufficient rectal thrust during defecation, or insufficient relaxation of anal sphincter muscles during contraction) and non-OOC group based on HR-ARM results. The rectal motility [rectal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure (MSP), rectal pressure during force delivery, residual anal pressure, rectal anal pressure gradient], rectal sensory function (initial rectal sensory capacity threshold, initial fecal sensory capacity threshold, defecation distress capacity threshold, and maximum tolerance capacity threshold) and other indicators were compared between OOC group and non-OOC group in 2 age groups, respectively. <b>Results:</b> A total of 228 children with FC were included, including 146 males and 82 females, with an age [<i>M</i> (<i>Q</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>Q</i><sub>3</sub>)] of 7.5 (6.0, 9.7) years, including 54 in the low age group and 174 in the high age group. There were 131 cases in the OOC group and 97 cases in the non-OOC group. Compared with non OOC children (24 cases), there were no statistically significant differences in rectal resting pressure, anal sphincter resting pressure, MSP, rectal pressure during force delivery, initial rectal sensory capacity threshold, initial fecal sensory capacity threshold, defecation distress capacity threshold, and maximum tolerance capacity threshold among OOC children (30 cases) in the low age group (all <i>P</i>>0.05). In the high age group, the residual anal pressure of the OOC children (101 cases) was higher than that of the non-OOC children (73 cases) [102 (70, 113) vs 41 (24, 58) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), <i>P</i><0.001], and the rectal anal pressure gradient was lower than that of the non-OOC children [-43 (-55, -23) vs 16 (9, 29) mmHg, <i>P</i><0.001];The initial fecal sensory capacity threshold of the OOC children was higher than that of the non-OOC children [90 (54, 110) vs 60 (50, 91) ml, <i>P</i>=0.024]. <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared with non-OOC children in the same age group, OOC children aged 6 years and above have higher residual anal pressure and initial fecal sensory capacity threshold, and lower rectal anal pressure gradient. There is no statistically significant differences in the rectal sensory function in children under 6 years old with OOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"104 39","pages":"3676-3680"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparative analysis of the characteristics of high-resolution anorectal manometry in children with outlet obstructive constipation of different age groups].\",\"authors\":\"Q H Li, R F Wang, F M Xue, X Q Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240516-01129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the characteristics of high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) in children with outlet obstructive constipation (OOC) in different age groups. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective inclusion of clinical data of functional constipation (FC) patients who underwent HR-ARM examination in the Department of Gastroenterology of Children's Hospital Affiliated of Zhengzhou University from January 2019 to September 2023 was conducted. The patients were divided into low age group (4 years old≤age<6 years) and high age group (6 years old≤age≤15 years old) according to age. They were divided into OOC group (the pediatric patients with uncoordinated pelvic floor muscle contractions, insufficient rectal thrust during defecation, or insufficient relaxation of anal sphincter muscles during contraction) and non-OOC group based on HR-ARM results. The rectal motility [rectal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure (MSP), rectal pressure during force delivery, residual anal pressure, rectal anal pressure gradient], rectal sensory function (initial rectal sensory capacity threshold, initial fecal sensory capacity threshold, defecation distress capacity threshold, and maximum tolerance capacity threshold) and other indicators were compared between OOC group and non-OOC group in 2 age groups, respectively. <b>Results:</b> A total of 228 children with FC were included, including 146 males and 82 females, with an age [<i>M</i> (<i>Q</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>Q</i><sub>3</sub>)] of 7.5 (6.0, 9.7) years, including 54 in the low age group and 174 in the high age group. There were 131 cases in the OOC group and 97 cases in the non-OOC group. Compared with non OOC children (24 cases), there were no statistically significant differences in rectal resting pressure, anal sphincter resting pressure, MSP, rectal pressure during force delivery, initial rectal sensory capacity threshold, initial fecal sensory capacity threshold, defecation distress capacity threshold, and maximum tolerance capacity threshold among OOC children (30 cases) in the low age group (all <i>P</i>>0.05). In the high age group, the residual anal pressure of the OOC children (101 cases) was higher than that of the non-OOC children (73 cases) [102 (70, 113) vs 41 (24, 58) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), <i>P</i><0.001], and the rectal anal pressure gradient was lower than that of the non-OOC children [-43 (-55, -23) vs 16 (9, 29) mmHg, <i>P</i><0.001];The initial fecal sensory capacity threshold of the OOC children was higher than that of the non-OOC children [90 (54, 110) vs 60 (50, 91) ml, <i>P</i>=0.024]. <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared with non-OOC children in the same age group, OOC children aged 6 years and above have higher residual anal pressure and initial fecal sensory capacity threshold, and lower rectal anal pressure gradient. There is no statistically significant differences in the rectal sensory function in children under 6 years old with OOC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi\",\"volume\":\"104 39\",\"pages\":\"3676-3680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240516-01129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240516-01129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较不同年龄组出口梗阻性便秘(OOC)患儿的高分辨率肛门直肠测压(HR-ARM)特征。方法:回顾性纳入2019年1月至2023年9月在郑州大学附属儿童医院消化内科接受HR-ARM检查的功能性便秘(FC)患者的临床资料。将患者分为低年龄组(4岁≤年龄组):共纳入228例FC患儿,其中男146例,女82例,年龄[M(Q1,Q3)]为7.5(6.0,9.7)岁,其中低年龄组54例,高年龄组174例。OOC 组有 131 例,非 OOC 组有 97 例。与非 OOC 儿童(24 例)相比,低年龄组 OOC 儿童(30 例)的直肠静止压、肛门括约肌静止压、MSP、用力时的直肠压、初始直肠感觉能力阈值、初始粪便感觉能力阈值、排便困扰能力阈值和最大耐受能力阈值均无统计学差异(均 P>0.05)。在高年龄组中,OOC 患儿(101 例)的肛门残压高于非 OOC 患儿(73 例)[102(70,113) vs 41(24,58)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),PPP=0.024]。结论:与同龄非 OOC 儿童相比,6 岁及以上 OOC 儿童的肛门残压和初始粪便感觉能力阈值较高,直肠肛门压力梯度较低。6 岁以下 OOC 儿童的直肠感觉功能差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Comparative analysis of the characteristics of high-resolution anorectal manometry in children with outlet obstructive constipation of different age groups].

Objective: To compare the characteristics of high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) in children with outlet obstructive constipation (OOC) in different age groups. Methods: Retrospective inclusion of clinical data of functional constipation (FC) patients who underwent HR-ARM examination in the Department of Gastroenterology of Children's Hospital Affiliated of Zhengzhou University from January 2019 to September 2023 was conducted. The patients were divided into low age group (4 years old≤age<6 years) and high age group (6 years old≤age≤15 years old) according to age. They were divided into OOC group (the pediatric patients with uncoordinated pelvic floor muscle contractions, insufficient rectal thrust during defecation, or insufficient relaxation of anal sphincter muscles during contraction) and non-OOC group based on HR-ARM results. The rectal motility [rectal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure (MSP), rectal pressure during force delivery, residual anal pressure, rectal anal pressure gradient], rectal sensory function (initial rectal sensory capacity threshold, initial fecal sensory capacity threshold, defecation distress capacity threshold, and maximum tolerance capacity threshold) and other indicators were compared between OOC group and non-OOC group in 2 age groups, respectively. Results: A total of 228 children with FC were included, including 146 males and 82 females, with an age [M (Q1, Q3)] of 7.5 (6.0, 9.7) years, including 54 in the low age group and 174 in the high age group. There were 131 cases in the OOC group and 97 cases in the non-OOC group. Compared with non OOC children (24 cases), there were no statistically significant differences in rectal resting pressure, anal sphincter resting pressure, MSP, rectal pressure during force delivery, initial rectal sensory capacity threshold, initial fecal sensory capacity threshold, defecation distress capacity threshold, and maximum tolerance capacity threshold among OOC children (30 cases) in the low age group (all P>0.05). In the high age group, the residual anal pressure of the OOC children (101 cases) was higher than that of the non-OOC children (73 cases) [102 (70, 113) vs 41 (24, 58) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), P<0.001], and the rectal anal pressure gradient was lower than that of the non-OOC children [-43 (-55, -23) vs 16 (9, 29) mmHg, P<0.001];The initial fecal sensory capacity threshold of the OOC children was higher than that of the non-OOC children [90 (54, 110) vs 60 (50, 91) ml, P=0.024]. Conclusions: Compared with non-OOC children in the same age group, OOC children aged 6 years and above have higher residual anal pressure and initial fecal sensory capacity threshold, and lower rectal anal pressure gradient. There is no statistically significant differences in the rectal sensory function in children under 6 years old with OOC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
期刊最新文献
[A prospective phase Ⅱ clinical trial of toripalimab combined with platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer]. [Analysis and reflections on the current status of diagnosis and treatment of marginal zone lymphoma]. [Application of robot-assisted laparoscopic isthmectomy for the treatment of symptomatic horseshoe kidney]. [Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with TP53 mutation]. [Comparison of microdrill versus diode laser in endoscopic stapedotomy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1