左乙拉西坦与苯巴比妥作为治疗新生儿癫痫发作的一线疗法的疗效对比。

Q2 Medicine Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-14 DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-29.5.482
Destini Long, Courtney Sutton, Jennifer Hale
{"title":"左乙拉西坦与苯巴比妥作为治疗新生儿癫痫发作的一线疗法的疗效对比。","authors":"Destini Long, Courtney Sutton, Jennifer Hale","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.5.482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Seizures are one of the most common neurologic complications seen in a neonate. Historically, phenobarbital has been the agent of choice, but can lead to adverse neurologic outcomes, which has contributed to the use of other agents. Levetiracetam has proven great efficacy with an excellent safety profile in older patients, causing interest of its use in neonates. The objective of this study was to determine if levetiracetam would provide similar neonatal seizure resolution rates as phenobarbital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study from August 1, 2020 to August 31, 2022 investigating the efficacy and safety of using levetiracetam compared with phenobarbital as a first line treatment for neonatal seizures. The primary outcome was to assess overall seizure resolution after administration of levetiracetam or phenobarbital, without addition of a second antiseizure medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 87 patients included in the study. Fifteen neonates (27.78%) achieved seizure resolution with phenobarbital compared with 9 neonates (27.27%) who received levetiracetam first line (p = 0.959). Neonates who received phenobarbital had higher rates of adverse effects. Neonates who received a benzodiazepine prior to administration of levetiracetam had lower seizure resolution rates (p = 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest there is no difference in using phenobarbital over levetiracetam to achieve complete seizure resolution in a neonate. Higher rates of adverse events were seen in the phenobarbital group. The use of a benzodiazepine prior to administration of levetiracetam may reduce the efficacy of levetiracetam.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 5","pages":"482-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Levetiracetam vs Phenobarbital as First Line Therapy for the Treatment of Neonatal Seizures.\",\"authors\":\"Destini Long, Courtney Sutton, Jennifer Hale\",\"doi\":\"10.5863/1551-6776-29.5.482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Seizures are one of the most common neurologic complications seen in a neonate. Historically, phenobarbital has been the agent of choice, but can lead to adverse neurologic outcomes, which has contributed to the use of other agents. Levetiracetam has proven great efficacy with an excellent safety profile in older patients, causing interest of its use in neonates. The objective of this study was to determine if levetiracetam would provide similar neonatal seizure resolution rates as phenobarbital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study from August 1, 2020 to August 31, 2022 investigating the efficacy and safety of using levetiracetam compared with phenobarbital as a first line treatment for neonatal seizures. The primary outcome was to assess overall seizure resolution after administration of levetiracetam or phenobarbital, without addition of a second antiseizure medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 87 patients included in the study. Fifteen neonates (27.78%) achieved seizure resolution with phenobarbital compared with 9 neonates (27.27%) who received levetiracetam first line (p = 0.959). Neonates who received phenobarbital had higher rates of adverse effects. Neonates who received a benzodiazepine prior to administration of levetiracetam had lower seizure resolution rates (p = 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest there is no difference in using phenobarbital over levetiracetam to achieve complete seizure resolution in a neonate. Higher rates of adverse events were seen in the phenobarbital group. The use of a benzodiazepine prior to administration of levetiracetam may reduce the efficacy of levetiracetam.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"482-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472408/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.5.482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.5.482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:癫痫发作是新生儿最常见的神经系统并发症之一。苯巴比妥一直是首选药物,但可能会导致不良的神经系统后果,这促使人们开始使用其他药物。事实证明,左乙拉西坦在老年患者中具有良好的疗效和安全性,这引起了人们对其在新生儿中应用的兴趣。本研究的目的是确定左乙拉西坦是否能提供与苯巴比妥相似的新生儿癫痫发作缓解率:该研究是一项单中心、回顾性、队列研究,研究时间为 2020 年 8 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 31 日,研究对象为将左乙拉西坦与苯巴比妥作为新生儿癫痫发作一线治疗药物进行比较的有效性和安全性。主要结果是评估在服用左乙拉西坦或苯巴比妥后癫痫发作的总体缓解情况,而不需要添加第二种抗癫痫药物:共有 87 名患者参与了研究。15名新生儿(27.78%)服用苯巴比妥后癫痫发作得到缓解,而9名新生儿(27.27%)服用左乙拉西坦后癫痫发作得到缓解(P = 0.959)。接受苯巴比妥治疗的新生儿不良反应发生率较高。在服用左乙拉西坦之前服用苯二氮卓的新生儿癫痫发作缓解率较低(p = 0.021):这些研究结果表明,使用苯巴比妥和左乙拉西坦对新生儿癫痫发作的完全缓解没有区别。苯巴比妥组的不良反应发生率更高。在服用左乙拉西坦之前使用苯二氮卓可能会降低左乙拉西坦的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Levetiracetam vs Phenobarbital as First Line Therapy for the Treatment of Neonatal Seizures.

Objective: Seizures are one of the most common neurologic complications seen in a neonate. Historically, phenobarbital has been the agent of choice, but can lead to adverse neurologic outcomes, which has contributed to the use of other agents. Levetiracetam has proven great efficacy with an excellent safety profile in older patients, causing interest of its use in neonates. The objective of this study was to determine if levetiracetam would provide similar neonatal seizure resolution rates as phenobarbital.

Methods: The study was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study from August 1, 2020 to August 31, 2022 investigating the efficacy and safety of using levetiracetam compared with phenobarbital as a first line treatment for neonatal seizures. The primary outcome was to assess overall seizure resolution after administration of levetiracetam or phenobarbital, without addition of a second antiseizure medication.

Results: There were 87 patients included in the study. Fifteen neonates (27.78%) achieved seizure resolution with phenobarbital compared with 9 neonates (27.27%) who received levetiracetam first line (p = 0.959). Neonates who received phenobarbital had higher rates of adverse effects. Neonates who received a benzodiazepine prior to administration of levetiracetam had lower seizure resolution rates (p = 0.021).

Conclusions: These findings suggest there is no difference in using phenobarbital over levetiracetam to achieve complete seizure resolution in a neonate. Higher rates of adverse events were seen in the phenobarbital group. The use of a benzodiazepine prior to administration of levetiracetam may reduce the efficacy of levetiracetam.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the official journal of the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. JPPT is a peer-reviewed multi disciplinary journal that is devoted to promoting the safe and effective use of medications in infants and children. To this end, the journal publishes practical information for all practitioners who provide care to pediatric patients. Each issue includes review articles, original clinical investigations, case reports, editorials, and other information relevant to pediatric medication therapy. The Journal focuses all work on issues related to the practice of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics. The scope of content includes pharmacotherapy, extemporaneous compounding, dosing, methods of medication administration, medication error prevention, and legislative issues. The Journal will contain original research, review articles, short subjects, case reports, clinical investigations, editorials, and news from such organizations as the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group, the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and so on.
期刊最新文献
Ketorolac Dose Ceiling Effect for Pediatric Headache in the Emergency Department. Management of Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome in Pediatric Patients: A Clinical Review. Pediatric Lead Chelation Managed During Critical Medication Shortages: Case Report and Literature Review. Pharmacogenomics in Pediatric Oncology Research and Treatment. Propranolol As a Treatment Option for Chylous Effusions and Chylous Ascites in Fetuses and Neonates: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1