为下肢假肢设计情感 - 用关西工程学方法了解下肢假肢的外观。

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20556683241289938
Nerrolyn Ramstrand, Maria Riveiro, Lars Eriksson, Michael Ceder
{"title":"为下肢假肢设计情感 - 用关西工程学方法了解下肢假肢的外观。","authors":"Nerrolyn Ramstrand, Maria Riveiro, Lars Eriksson, Michael Ceder","doi":"10.1177/20556683241289938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study aimed to quantify the relationship between prosthetic users' emotional response to prosthesis aesthetics and specific product properties. <b>Methods:</b> Words representing prosthesis users' emotional response (Kansei) to different aesthetic designs of prostheses were identified via interviews and mood boards. A group of experts consolidated the words into thematic groups, each represented by a single, high-level 'Kansei' word. 53 lower limb prosthesis users completed a questionnaire, rating their perception of 13 aesthetic designs using the 'Kansei' words. Quantification Theory Type 1 was applied to explore the relationship between words and product properties. Sub-analyses assessed for differences based on sex, age and level of extroversion. <b>Results:</b> 5 high-level Kansei words were identified ('Natural', 'Technological', 'Cool', 'Unique' and 'Functional'). The Kansei word 'Natural' had a strong association with realistic looking prostheses while the words 'Technological', 'Cool' and 'Unique' were strongly associated with expressive designs which incorporate hard, colourful covers. The word 'Functional' was not a reliable predictor of product properties. No major differences were observed within sub-grouped categories. <b>Conclusion:</b> Kansei words identified in this study can be used to help guide clients in their aesthetic design choices and to assist designers in achieving the desired response from their products.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing feelings into lower-limb prostheses - A kansei engineering approach to understand lower-limb prosthetic cosmeses.\",\"authors\":\"Nerrolyn Ramstrand, Maria Riveiro, Lars Eriksson, Michael Ceder\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20556683241289938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study aimed to quantify the relationship between prosthetic users' emotional response to prosthesis aesthetics and specific product properties. <b>Methods:</b> Words representing prosthesis users' emotional response (Kansei) to different aesthetic designs of prostheses were identified via interviews and mood boards. A group of experts consolidated the words into thematic groups, each represented by a single, high-level 'Kansei' word. 53 lower limb prosthesis users completed a questionnaire, rating their perception of 13 aesthetic designs using the 'Kansei' words. Quantification Theory Type 1 was applied to explore the relationship between words and product properties. Sub-analyses assessed for differences based on sex, age and level of extroversion. <b>Results:</b> 5 high-level Kansei words were identified ('Natural', 'Technological', 'Cool', 'Unique' and 'Functional'). The Kansei word 'Natural' had a strong association with realistic looking prostheses while the words 'Technological', 'Cool' and 'Unique' were strongly associated with expressive designs which incorporate hard, colourful covers. The word 'Functional' was not a reliable predictor of product properties. No major differences were observed within sub-grouped categories. <b>Conclusion:</b> Kansei words identified in this study can be used to help guide clients in their aesthetic design choices and to assist designers in achieving the desired response from their products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489910/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683241289938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683241289938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言本研究旨在量化假肢使用者对假肢美学的情感反应与特定产品特性之间的关系。研究方法:通过访谈和心情板确定了代表假肢使用者对不同假肢美学设计的情感反应(Kansei)的词语。一组专家将这些词语合并成主题组,每个主题组由一个高级 "Kansei "词代表。53 位下肢假肢使用者填写了一份调查问卷,使用 "Kansei "一词对 13 种美学设计的感知进行评分。量化理论类型 1 用于探索词语与产品特性之间的关系。子分析评估了基于性别、年龄和外向程度的差异。结果确定了 5 个高级 Kansei 词("自然"、"技术"、"酷"、"独特 "和 "功能")。自然 "这个 Kansei 词与外观逼真的假肢有很强的关联,而 "技术"、"酷 "和 "独特 "则与结合了坚硬、多彩外壳的表现性设计有很强的关联。功能性 "一词对产品特性的预测并不可靠。在细分类别中没有发现重大差异。结论本研究中发现的关西词可以用来帮助指导客户选择美学设计,并帮助设计师从产品中获得理想的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing feelings into lower-limb prostheses - A kansei engineering approach to understand lower-limb prosthetic cosmeses.

Introduction: This study aimed to quantify the relationship between prosthetic users' emotional response to prosthesis aesthetics and specific product properties. Methods: Words representing prosthesis users' emotional response (Kansei) to different aesthetic designs of prostheses were identified via interviews and mood boards. A group of experts consolidated the words into thematic groups, each represented by a single, high-level 'Kansei' word. 53 lower limb prosthesis users completed a questionnaire, rating their perception of 13 aesthetic designs using the 'Kansei' words. Quantification Theory Type 1 was applied to explore the relationship between words and product properties. Sub-analyses assessed for differences based on sex, age and level of extroversion. Results: 5 high-level Kansei words were identified ('Natural', 'Technological', 'Cool', 'Unique' and 'Functional'). The Kansei word 'Natural' had a strong association with realistic looking prostheses while the words 'Technological', 'Cool' and 'Unique' were strongly associated with expressive designs which incorporate hard, colourful covers. The word 'Functional' was not a reliable predictor of product properties. No major differences were observed within sub-grouped categories. Conclusion: Kansei words identified in this study can be used to help guide clients in their aesthetic design choices and to assist designers in achieving the desired response from their products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence approach for detecting and classifying abnormal behaviour in older adults using wearable sensors. Designing feelings into lower-limb prostheses - A kansei engineering approach to understand lower-limb prosthetic cosmeses. Public opinion on types of voice systems for older adults. Initial feasibility evaluation of the RISES system: An innovative and activity-based closed-loop framework for spinal cord injury rehabilitation and recovery. Inclusive rehabilitation and assistive technologies development: An exploration of considerations, principles, and stakeholder engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1