针对新毕业护士的护理实践准备量表(NPRS)波斯语版本的翻译和验证。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02434-6
Amir Jalali, Amirhossein Naghibzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Mojgan Rostami, Parnia Kalhory, Nazanin Mardani Taghvostani, Khalil Moradi
{"title":"针对新毕业护士的护理实践准备量表(NPRS)波斯语版本的翻译和验证。","authors":"Amir Jalali, Amirhossein Naghibzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Mojgan Rostami, Parnia Kalhory, Nazanin Mardani Taghvostani, Khalil Moradi","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02434-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical readiness of newly graduated nurses is crucial in meeting the growing demand for health services. Consequently, it is essential to develop a scale that accurately evaluates the clinical readiness of these novice nurses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to translate and psychometrically evaluate the Persian version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS) for new graduate nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This methodological and cross-sectional study was conducted on new graduate nurses from June to November 2023 in Kermanshah City, Iran. The translation of the scale was performed using the forward-backward translation method. Construct validity was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with a sample of 180 participants and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with a sample of 318 participants, both employing the convenience sampling method. The internal consistency of the tool was measured using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Additionally, the tool's reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The analyses were conducted using SPSS version 27 and LISREL version 8 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of EFA and CFA confirmed the tool's structure, comprising five factors and 35 items. The CFA results showed a well-fitting model (CFI = 0.96, NNFI = 0.96, GFI = 0.893, RMSEA = 0.062, SRMR = 0.049). Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a significant relationship between the items, subscales, and the main scale. Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the tool was 0.932, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.891(0.724-0.957).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Persian version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS) is a valid and reliable tool, comprising 35 items and five factors. This scale can be effectively used to evaluate the clinical readiness of newly graduated nurses within the Iranian community.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"23 1","pages":"760"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation and validation of the Persian version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS) for new graduate nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Jalali, Amirhossein Naghibzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Mojgan Rostami, Parnia Kalhory, Nazanin Mardani Taghvostani, Khalil Moradi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12912-024-02434-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical readiness of newly graduated nurses is crucial in meeting the growing demand for health services. Consequently, it is essential to develop a scale that accurately evaluates the clinical readiness of these novice nurses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to translate and psychometrically evaluate the Persian version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS) for new graduate nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This methodological and cross-sectional study was conducted on new graduate nurses from June to November 2023 in Kermanshah City, Iran. The translation of the scale was performed using the forward-backward translation method. Construct validity was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with a sample of 180 participants and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with a sample of 318 participants, both employing the convenience sampling method. The internal consistency of the tool was measured using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Additionally, the tool's reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The analyses were conducted using SPSS version 27 and LISREL version 8 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of EFA and CFA confirmed the tool's structure, comprising five factors and 35 items. The CFA results showed a well-fitting model (CFI = 0.96, NNFI = 0.96, GFI = 0.893, RMSEA = 0.062, SRMR = 0.049). Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a significant relationship between the items, subscales, and the main scale. Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the tool was 0.932, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.891(0.724-0.957).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Persian version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS) is a valid and reliable tool, comprising 35 items and five factors. This scale can be effectively used to evaluate the clinical readiness of newly graduated nurses within the Iranian community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"760\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484381/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02434-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02434-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新毕业护士的临床准备程度对于满足日益增长的医疗服务需求至关重要。目的:本研究旨在翻译波斯语版护理实践准备量表(NPRS)并对其进行心理测量学评估:这项方法学横断面研究的对象是 2023 年 6 月至 11 月在伊朗克尔曼沙阿市新毕业的护士。量表的翻译采用了前向-后向翻译法。结构效度的评估采用了探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA),前者抽取了 180 名样本,后者抽取了 318 名样本,均采用了便利抽样法。工具的内部一致性采用 Cronbach's alpha 系数进行测量。此外,还使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估了工具的可靠性。分析使用 SPSS 27 版和 LISREL 8 版软件进行:EFA 和 CFA 的结果证实了该工具的结构,包括五个因子和 35 个项目。CFA 结果显示模型拟合良好(CFI = 0.96,NNFI = 0.96,GFI = 0.893,RMSEA = 0.062,SRMR = 0.049)。皮尔逊相关系数表明,各项目、分量表和主量表之间存在显著的相关关系。此外,该工具的 Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.932,类内相关系数(ICC)为 0.891(0.724-0.957):波斯语版护理实践准备量表(NPRS)由 35 个项目和 5 个因子组成,是一个有效且可靠的工具。该量表可有效用于评估伊朗社区新毕业护士的临床准备情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Translation and validation of the Persian version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS) for new graduate nurses.

Background: The clinical readiness of newly graduated nurses is crucial in meeting the growing demand for health services. Consequently, it is essential to develop a scale that accurately evaluates the clinical readiness of these novice nurses.

Aim: This study aimed to translate and psychometrically evaluate the Persian version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS) for new graduate nurses.

Methods: This methodological and cross-sectional study was conducted on new graduate nurses from June to November 2023 in Kermanshah City, Iran. The translation of the scale was performed using the forward-backward translation method. Construct validity was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with a sample of 180 participants and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with a sample of 318 participants, both employing the convenience sampling method. The internal consistency of the tool was measured using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Additionally, the tool's reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The analyses were conducted using SPSS version 27 and LISREL version 8 software.

Results: The results of EFA and CFA confirmed the tool's structure, comprising five factors and 35 items. The CFA results showed a well-fitting model (CFI = 0.96, NNFI = 0.96, GFI = 0.893, RMSEA = 0.062, SRMR = 0.049). Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a significant relationship between the items, subscales, and the main scale. Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the tool was 0.932, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.891(0.724-0.957).

Conclusion: The Persian version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS) is a valid and reliable tool, comprising 35 items and five factors. This scale can be effectively used to evaluate the clinical readiness of newly graduated nurses within the Iranian community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Gender-related differences in the scope of nursing practice: evidence from a cross-sectional study in geriatric healthcare settings. Relationship between job burnout and presenteeism in anesthesia nurses: mediating effect of psychological capital. Using signal detection test to assess the correlation between daily sleep duration, mental workload, and attention sensitivity in nurses. Knowledge and practice of pediatric pain management and associated factors among nurses in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lived experiences of older adults within an integrated hospital-at-home service: an interpretive phenomenological analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1