药物审查经济激励计划对老年痴呆症住院患者多药治疗的影响:一项前后回顾性研究。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001294
Takahito Morita, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hayato Yamana, Tatsuya Hosoi, Sumito Ogawa, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"药物审查经济激励计划对老年痴呆症住院患者多药治疗的影响:一项前后回顾性研究。","authors":"Takahito Morita, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hayato Yamana, Tatsuya Hosoi, Sumito Ogawa, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Polypharmacy is an important healthcare issue, especially in elderly patients with dementia. As an incentive to reduce polypharmacy, a health insurance reimbursement scheme was introduced in 2016 for medication review and the reduction of medications for inpatients in Japan. However, the effects of these incentive schemes were not evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 1,465,881 inpatients aged ≥65 years with dementia. An interrupted time-series analysis was conducted by fitting a Prais-Winsten linear regression model. The outcome measure was the number of classes of medications prescribed during discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant changes were observed in the average number of medication classes at discharge immediately after the introduction of the scheme (coefficient: -0.022, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.17 to 0.13). The slope change, representing the effect of the intervention over time, was also not significant (coefficient: -0.00053, 95% confidence interval: -0.0012 to 0.00018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incentive scheme was not associated with a reduction in the number of medication classes at discharge among older inpatients with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":"30-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a Financial Incentive Scheme for Medication Review on Polypharmacy in Elderly Inpatients With Dementia: A Retrospective Before-and-After Study.\",\"authors\":\"Takahito Morita, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hayato Yamana, Tatsuya Hosoi, Sumito Ogawa, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Polypharmacy is an important healthcare issue, especially in elderly patients with dementia. As an incentive to reduce polypharmacy, a health insurance reimbursement scheme was introduced in 2016 for medication review and the reduction of medications for inpatients in Japan. However, the effects of these incentive schemes were not evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 1,465,881 inpatients aged ≥65 years with dementia. An interrupted time-series analysis was conducted by fitting a Prais-Winsten linear regression model. The outcome measure was the number of classes of medications prescribed during discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant changes were observed in the average number of medication classes at discharge immediately after the introduction of the scheme (coefficient: -0.022, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.17 to 0.13). The slope change, representing the effect of the intervention over time, was also not significant (coefficient: -0.00053, 95% confidence interval: -0.0012 to 0.00018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incentive scheme was not associated with a reduction in the number of medication classes at discharge among older inpatients with dementia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"30-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001294\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多药治疗是一个重要的医疗保健问题,尤其是老年痴呆症患者。作为减少多药治疗的激励措施,日本于 2016 年推出了一项医疗保险报销计划,用于住院患者的用药检查和减药。然而,这些激励计划的效果并未得到评估:我们确定了 1,465,881 名年龄≥65 岁的痴呆症住院患者。通过拟合 Prais-Winsten 线性回归模型进行了间断时间序列分析。结果以出院时开具的药物种类数量为衡量标准:结果:在引入该计划后,出院时平均用药种类数量没有发生明显变化(系数:-0.022,95% 置信区间 [CI]:-0.17 至 0.13)。代表干预效果随时间变化的斜率变化也不显著(系数:-0.00053,95% 置信区间:-0.0012 至 0.00018):激励计划与老年痴呆症住院患者出院时用药次数的减少无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of a Financial Incentive Scheme for Medication Review on Polypharmacy in Elderly Inpatients With Dementia: A Retrospective Before-and-After Study.

Objectives: Polypharmacy is an important healthcare issue, especially in elderly patients with dementia. As an incentive to reduce polypharmacy, a health insurance reimbursement scheme was introduced in 2016 for medication review and the reduction of medications for inpatients in Japan. However, the effects of these incentive schemes were not evaluated.

Methods: We identified 1,465,881 inpatients aged ≥65 years with dementia. An interrupted time-series analysis was conducted by fitting a Prais-Winsten linear regression model. The outcome measure was the number of classes of medications prescribed during discharge.

Results: No significant changes were observed in the average number of medication classes at discharge immediately after the introduction of the scheme (coefficient: -0.022, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.17 to 0.13). The slope change, representing the effect of the intervention over time, was also not significant (coefficient: -0.00053, 95% confidence interval: -0.0012 to 0.00018).

Conclusions: The incentive scheme was not associated with a reduction in the number of medication classes at discharge among older inpatients with dementia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
期刊最新文献
Patient Falls in the Operating Room: The Danger of an Obese Patient on an Unlocked Operating Room Table. Decreasing Hospital-acquired Pressure Injuries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A 5-step Quality Improvement Approach. Situational Analysis of the Medication Practices in Brazilian Hospitals: A Multicenter Study. The Relationship Between Medical Error Attitudes of Surgical Nurses and Evidence-Based Work Environment. It's Called "Informed Consent," But How "Informed" Are Patients? A Patient Perspective on Informed Consent in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1