{"title":"腰椎病患者的生活质量和功能状态","authors":"Elvis Mahmutović, Teodora Safiye, Emir Biševac, Aldina Ajdinović, Zerina Salihagić, Slaviša Minić, Zana Dolićanin","doi":"10.18502/ijph.v53i8.16289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of life (QL) of patients with lumbar radiculopathy (LR) stands for personal experience of the functional effect of the ailment and therapy applied to the patient. We aimed to evaluate the QL in patients with LR before the start of treatment, as well as three and six months following the start of medical rehabilitation, that was prescribed and implemented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted at the Special Hospital for Progressive Muscular and Neuromuscular Diseases in Novi Pazar, Serbia, from 2014 to 2016. A stratified, randomized sample included fifty patients with LR. All patients had an educational training program in ergonomics, physical therapy procedures, and kinetic and ergonomic therapeutic procedures as part of the conservative treatment. We employed two standardized questionnaires, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the SF-36, to evaluate the patients' condition, their QL, and the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of SF-36 - PCS, SF-36 - MCS, and ODI, the lowest values were noted at the start of rehabilitation (PCS:35.5; MCS:37.8; ODI:51.5%). Three months later, there was a significant improvement in the scores (PCS:42.8; MCS:45.2; ODI:38.9%), and six months later, the scores were somewhat higher (PCS:49.2; MCS:40.6; ODI:23.7%) (<i>P</i><0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When comparing the conditions, the QL and functional status of patients with LR are significantly improved. They were better at three and six months compared to the start of rehabilitation and at six months compared to the condition at three months.</p>","PeriodicalId":49173,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life and Functional Status of Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Elvis Mahmutović, Teodora Safiye, Emir Biševac, Aldina Ajdinović, Zerina Salihagić, Slaviša Minić, Zana Dolićanin\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijph.v53i8.16289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of life (QL) of patients with lumbar radiculopathy (LR) stands for personal experience of the functional effect of the ailment and therapy applied to the patient. We aimed to evaluate the QL in patients with LR before the start of treatment, as well as three and six months following the start of medical rehabilitation, that was prescribed and implemented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted at the Special Hospital for Progressive Muscular and Neuromuscular Diseases in Novi Pazar, Serbia, from 2014 to 2016. A stratified, randomized sample included fifty patients with LR. All patients had an educational training program in ergonomics, physical therapy procedures, and kinetic and ergonomic therapeutic procedures as part of the conservative treatment. We employed two standardized questionnaires, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the SF-36, to evaluate the patients' condition, their QL, and the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of SF-36 - PCS, SF-36 - MCS, and ODI, the lowest values were noted at the start of rehabilitation (PCS:35.5; MCS:37.8; ODI:51.5%). Three months later, there was a significant improvement in the scores (PCS:42.8; MCS:45.2; ODI:38.9%), and six months later, the scores were somewhat higher (PCS:49.2; MCS:40.6; ODI:23.7%) (<i>P</i><0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When comparing the conditions, the QL and functional status of patients with LR are significantly improved. They were better at three and six months compared to the start of rehabilitation and at six months compared to the condition at three months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475174/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i8.16289\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i8.16289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:腰椎病(LR)患者的生活质量(QL)代表了患者对疾病和治疗对其功能影响的个人体验。我们的目的是评估腰椎间盘突出症患者在开始治疗前、开始医疗康复后三个月和六个月的生活质量:研究于 2014 年至 2016 年在塞尔维亚诺维帕扎尔的进行性肌肉和神经肌肉疾病专科医院进行。分层随机抽样包括 50 名 LR 患者。作为保守治疗的一部分,所有患者都接受了人体工程学、物理治疗程序、运动学和人体工程学治疗程序方面的教育培训。我们采用了两种标准化问卷:Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和SF-36,来评估患者的病情、生活质量和康复治疗的效果:就 SF-36 - PCS、SF-36 - MCS 和 ODI 而言,康复初期的数值最低(PCS:35.5;MCS:37.8;ODI:51.5%)。三个月后,得分有了明显改善(PCS:42.8;MCS:45.2;ODI:38.9%),六个月后,得分略有提高(PCS:49.2;MCS:40.6;ODI:23.7%):比较两种情况,LR 患者的 QL 和功能状态有明显改善。与康复开始时相比,三个月和六个月时的情况更好;与三个月时的情况相比,六个月时的情况更好。
Quality of Life and Functional Status of Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy.
Background: Quality of life (QL) of patients with lumbar radiculopathy (LR) stands for personal experience of the functional effect of the ailment and therapy applied to the patient. We aimed to evaluate the QL in patients with LR before the start of treatment, as well as three and six months following the start of medical rehabilitation, that was prescribed and implemented.
Methods: The research was conducted at the Special Hospital for Progressive Muscular and Neuromuscular Diseases in Novi Pazar, Serbia, from 2014 to 2016. A stratified, randomized sample included fifty patients with LR. All patients had an educational training program in ergonomics, physical therapy procedures, and kinetic and ergonomic therapeutic procedures as part of the conservative treatment. We employed two standardized questionnaires, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the SF-36, to evaluate the patients' condition, their QL, and the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment.
Results: In terms of SF-36 - PCS, SF-36 - MCS, and ODI, the lowest values were noted at the start of rehabilitation (PCS:35.5; MCS:37.8; ODI:51.5%). Three months later, there was a significant improvement in the scores (PCS:42.8; MCS:45.2; ODI:38.9%), and six months later, the scores were somewhat higher (PCS:49.2; MCS:40.6; ODI:23.7%) (P<0.01).
Conclusion: When comparing the conditions, the QL and functional status of patients with LR are significantly improved. They were better at three and six months compared to the start of rehabilitation and at six months compared to the condition at three months.
期刊介绍:
Iranian Journal of Public Health has been continuously published since 1971, as the only Journal in all health domains, with wide distribution (including WHO in Geneva and Cairo) in two languages (English and Persian). From 2001 issue, the Journal is published only in English language. During the last 41 years more than 2000 scientific research papers, results of health activities, surveys and services, have been published in this Journal. To meet the increasing demand of respected researchers, as of January 2012, the Journal is published monthly. I wish this will assist to promote the level of global knowledge. The main topics that the Journal would welcome are: Bioethics, Disaster and Health, Entomology, Epidemiology, Health and Environment, Health Economics, Health Services, Immunology, Medical Genetics, Mental Health, Microbiology, Nutrition and Food Safety, Occupational Health, Oral Health. We would be very delighted to receive your Original papers, Review Articles, Short communications, Case reports and Scientific Letters to the Editor on the above mentioned research areas.