Agalliu Brunilda, Tunprasert Thanaporn, Walton Tom, McManus Liam
{"title":"对为解决国民健康服务等待时间过长问题而实施的虚拟肌肉骨骼足科服务进行评估。","authors":"Agalliu Brunilda, Tunprasert Thanaporn, Walton Tom, McManus Liam","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.12039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on healthcare systems globally, particularly in the public sector. To address the challenges posed by the pandemic, musculoskeletal (MSK) healthcare providers had to rapidly adopt virtual platforms for delivering care, representing a major shift in how healthcare was delivered.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This manuscript aims to retrospectively evaluate a virtual MSK podiatry service offered by a private provider under a National Health Service commission, in terms of patient access, waiting times and patient-reported pain. This service was developed and implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the extended waiting times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective clinical service evaluation was conducted on MSK podiatry services delivered via telephone or virtual consultations. The evaluation covered a cohort of 574 referred patients over a 19-month period (July 2021 to January 2023). It analysed demographic data, initial and final visual analogue pain scores, pathology categories, orthoses prescriptions and exercise rehabilitation plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from a total of 492 patients (male = 152 and female = 340) were analysed, with 82 patients excluded for non-attendance. The average waiting time from referral-to-first appointment and referral-to-discharge was 35 and 91 days, respectively. Results showed statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) in the mean visual analogue scale when patients received orthoses with and without a rehabilitation plan (4.12 ± 2.55 and 3.33 ± 2.88, respectively). Most patients (61.5%) were aged 40-69, with \"foot pain\" being the main reported pathology category. Patients had an average of two appointments. 56.5% of patients remained virtual throughout their journey and were successfully discharged to self-management. 43.9% were discharged to other face-to face services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study provided evidence that the virtual MSK podiatry service achieved a statistically significant reduction in patient-reported pain for various pathologies with reasonable waiting times. The service delivered favourable outcomes and complemented traditional services at a time with limited access due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of a virtual musculoskeletal podiatry service implemented to address prolonged National Health Service waiting times.\",\"authors\":\"Agalliu Brunilda, Tunprasert Thanaporn, Walton Tom, McManus Liam\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jfa2.12039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on healthcare systems globally, particularly in the public sector. To address the challenges posed by the pandemic, musculoskeletal (MSK) healthcare providers had to rapidly adopt virtual platforms for delivering care, representing a major shift in how healthcare was delivered.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This manuscript aims to retrospectively evaluate a virtual MSK podiatry service offered by a private provider under a National Health Service commission, in terms of patient access, waiting times and patient-reported pain. This service was developed and implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the extended waiting times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective clinical service evaluation was conducted on MSK podiatry services delivered via telephone or virtual consultations. The evaluation covered a cohort of 574 referred patients over a 19-month period (July 2021 to January 2023). It analysed demographic data, initial and final visual analogue pain scores, pathology categories, orthoses prescriptions and exercise rehabilitation plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from a total of 492 patients (male = 152 and female = 340) were analysed, with 82 patients excluded for non-attendance. The average waiting time from referral-to-first appointment and referral-to-discharge was 35 and 91 days, respectively. Results showed statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) in the mean visual analogue scale when patients received orthoses with and without a rehabilitation plan (4.12 ± 2.55 and 3.33 ± 2.88, respectively). Most patients (61.5%) were aged 40-69, with \\\"foot pain\\\" being the main reported pathology category. Patients had an average of two appointments. 56.5% of patients remained virtual throughout their journey and were successfully discharged to self-management. 43.9% were discharged to other face-to face services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study provided evidence that the virtual MSK podiatry service achieved a statistically significant reduction in patient-reported pain for various pathologies with reasonable waiting times. The service delivered favourable outcomes and complemented traditional services at a time with limited access due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489304/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.12039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.12039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An evaluation of a virtual musculoskeletal podiatry service implemented to address prolonged National Health Service waiting times.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on healthcare systems globally, particularly in the public sector. To address the challenges posed by the pandemic, musculoskeletal (MSK) healthcare providers had to rapidly adopt virtual platforms for delivering care, representing a major shift in how healthcare was delivered.
Objective: This manuscript aims to retrospectively evaluate a virtual MSK podiatry service offered by a private provider under a National Health Service commission, in terms of patient access, waiting times and patient-reported pain. This service was developed and implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the extended waiting times.
Methods: A retrospective clinical service evaluation was conducted on MSK podiatry services delivered via telephone or virtual consultations. The evaluation covered a cohort of 574 referred patients over a 19-month period (July 2021 to January 2023). It analysed demographic data, initial and final visual analogue pain scores, pathology categories, orthoses prescriptions and exercise rehabilitation plans.
Results: Data from a total of 492 patients (male = 152 and female = 340) were analysed, with 82 patients excluded for non-attendance. The average waiting time from referral-to-first appointment and referral-to-discharge was 35 and 91 days, respectively. Results showed statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) in the mean visual analogue scale when patients received orthoses with and without a rehabilitation plan (4.12 ± 2.55 and 3.33 ± 2.88, respectively). Most patients (61.5%) were aged 40-69, with "foot pain" being the main reported pathology category. Patients had an average of two appointments. 56.5% of patients remained virtual throughout their journey and were successfully discharged to self-management. 43.9% were discharged to other face-to face services.
Conclusions: The study provided evidence that the virtual MSK podiatry service achieved a statistically significant reduction in patient-reported pain for various pathologies with reasonable waiting times. The service delivered favourable outcomes and complemented traditional services at a time with limited access due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care.
The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care.
The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.