Kristen Westenfield MD, Steven M. Bradley MD, MPH, Larissa Stanberry PhD, Kevin M. Harris MD
{"title":"大型超声心动图队列中的升主动脉扩大率:相关风险因素和不良主动脉事件。","authors":"Kristen Westenfield MD, Steven M. Bradley MD, MPH, Larissa Stanberry PhD, Kevin M. Harris MD","doi":"10.1016/j.echo.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Understanding ascending aortic aneurysm growth and associated risk factors is critical to advising appropriate echocardiographic follow-up intervals for patients. The aim of this study was to identify aortic aneurysm growth rate on serial echocardiography as well as the clinical and demographic variables that contribute to baseline aortic size and subsequent aortic growth.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients identified with ascending aortic aneurysms and undergoing serial echocardiograms within 5 years were evaluated. Ascending aortic size was measured as part of routine echocardiographic examinations. Clinical and demographic variables including aortic valve type (trileaflet, bicuspid, or prosthetic) were evaluated for association with baseline aortic size as well as with aortic progression rate. Clinical events including aortic dissection and elective or emergent surgical repair were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 3,639 patients were identified (78% men; median age, 69 years), 175 (4.8%) with bicuspid valves and 206 (5.6%) with prior aortic valve replacement. Patients with larger aortas at baseline were older, with higher tobacco use and prior prosthetic valves. Over a mean of 2.4 years, aortic growth was observed and differed by valve type (trileaflet valve, 0.08 mm/y; bicuspid valve, 0.4 mm/y; <em>P</em> < .001). In six patients who developed aortic dissection, the estimated average annual growth rate was 0.98 mm/y.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a large echocardiographic cohort, aortic aneurysm growth rate was 0.08 mm/y, though it was higher in patients with bicuspid valves (0.4 mm/y), but initial aortic size did not correlate with change in the aortic progression rate. These data may help inform recommended echocardiographic surveillance intervals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","volume":"38 2","pages":"Pages 92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rate of Ascending Aortic Enlargement in a Large Echocardiographic Cohort: Associated Risk Factors and Adverse Aortic Events\",\"authors\":\"Kristen Westenfield MD, Steven M. Bradley MD, MPH, Larissa Stanberry PhD, Kevin M. Harris MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.echo.2024.09.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Understanding ascending aortic aneurysm growth and associated risk factors is critical to advising appropriate echocardiographic follow-up intervals for patients. The aim of this study was to identify aortic aneurysm growth rate on serial echocardiography as well as the clinical and demographic variables that contribute to baseline aortic size and subsequent aortic growth.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients identified with ascending aortic aneurysms and undergoing serial echocardiograms within 5 years were evaluated. Ascending aortic size was measured as part of routine echocardiographic examinations. Clinical and demographic variables including aortic valve type (trileaflet, bicuspid, or prosthetic) were evaluated for association with baseline aortic size as well as with aortic progression rate. Clinical events including aortic dissection and elective or emergent surgical repair were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 3,639 patients were identified (78% men; median age, 69 years), 175 (4.8%) with bicuspid valves and 206 (5.6%) with prior aortic valve replacement. Patients with larger aortas at baseline were older, with higher tobacco use and prior prosthetic valves. Over a mean of 2.4 years, aortic growth was observed and differed by valve type (trileaflet valve, 0.08 mm/y; bicuspid valve, 0.4 mm/y; <em>P</em> < .001). In six patients who developed aortic dissection, the estimated average annual growth rate was 0.98 mm/y.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a large echocardiographic cohort, aortic aneurysm growth rate was 0.08 mm/y, though it was higher in patients with bicuspid valves (0.4 mm/y), but initial aortic size did not correlate with change in the aortic progression rate. These data may help inform recommended echocardiographic surveillance intervals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 92-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894731724005066\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894731724005066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rate of Ascending Aortic Enlargement in a Large Echocardiographic Cohort: Associated Risk Factors and Adverse Aortic Events
Background
Understanding ascending aortic aneurysm growth and associated risk factors is critical to advising appropriate echocardiographic follow-up intervals for patients. The aim of this study was to identify aortic aneurysm growth rate on serial echocardiography as well as the clinical and demographic variables that contribute to baseline aortic size and subsequent aortic growth.
Methods
Patients identified with ascending aortic aneurysms and undergoing serial echocardiograms within 5 years were evaluated. Ascending aortic size was measured as part of routine echocardiographic examinations. Clinical and demographic variables including aortic valve type (trileaflet, bicuspid, or prosthetic) were evaluated for association with baseline aortic size as well as with aortic progression rate. Clinical events including aortic dissection and elective or emergent surgical repair were recorded.
Results
A total of 3,639 patients were identified (78% men; median age, 69 years), 175 (4.8%) with bicuspid valves and 206 (5.6%) with prior aortic valve replacement. Patients with larger aortas at baseline were older, with higher tobacco use and prior prosthetic valves. Over a mean of 2.4 years, aortic growth was observed and differed by valve type (trileaflet valve, 0.08 mm/y; bicuspid valve, 0.4 mm/y; P < .001). In six patients who developed aortic dissection, the estimated average annual growth rate was 0.98 mm/y.
Conclusions
In a large echocardiographic cohort, aortic aneurysm growth rate was 0.08 mm/y, though it was higher in patients with bicuspid valves (0.4 mm/y), but initial aortic size did not correlate with change in the aortic progression rate. These data may help inform recommended echocardiographic surveillance intervals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography(JASE) brings physicians and sonographers peer-reviewed original investigations and state-of-the-art review articles that cover conventional clinical applications of cardiovascular ultrasound, as well as newer techniques with emerging clinical applications. These include three-dimensional echocardiography, strain and strain rate methods for evaluating cardiac mechanics and interventional applications.