职业棒球投手颈部活动范围与肩部和肘部损伤相关的预后因素。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.026
Garrett S Bullock, Charles A Thigpen, Hannah Zhao, Laurie Devaney, Daniel Kline, Thomas J Noonan, Michael J Kissenberth, Ellen Shanley
{"title":"职业棒球投手颈部活动范围与肩部和肘部损伤相关的预后因素。","authors":"Garrett S Bullock, Charles A Thigpen, Hannah Zhao, Laurie Devaney, Daniel Kline, Thomas J Noonan, Michael J Kissenberth, Ellen Shanley","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Authors have observed an association between cervical spine mobility and arm injury risk in baseball player; however, there is a need to assess the generalizability of cervical measurement data. Assessing the downstream of associations of cervical dysfunction on shoulder and elbow injuries can inform clinical interventions to help reduce future arm injuries. The purpose of this study was to assess the generalizability of neck range of motion measures as arm injury prognostic factors in professional baseball pitchers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of professional baseball pitchers in one Major League Baseball Organization was performed. Pitchers underwent pre-season neck range of motion including cervical flexion, extension, rotation, lateral flexion, and the flexion-rotation test (CFRT) and were followed for the season. The outcome was the occurrence of shoulder or elbow injury. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed and reported as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 pitchers were included (Age: 24.2 (2.4); Left-Handed: 21 (23%); Fastball Velocity: 92.3 (1.8)), with 15,942 athlete exposure days collected over the season. Pitcher neck range of motion was assessed (Flexion: 64 (10); Extension: 69 (11); Difference in Lateral Flexion: -1 (7); Difference in Neck Rotation: -2 (9); Difference in CFRT: -1 (7)). A total of 20 arm injuries (Shoulder: 9 (10%); Elbow: 11 (13%); Combined Rate: 1.3 (95% CI: 0.7, 1.7) per 1000 exposure days) were suffered by pitchers during the season. For every degree increase in the difference in dominant (rotating to dominant shoulder) versus non-dominant (rotating to non-dominant shoulder) neck rotation, there was a four-fold increase in arm injury hazard (HR: 4.0 (95% CI: 1.1, 13.9), p = 0.031). No other neck measurements demonstrated prognostic value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A deficit in dominant versus non-dominant neck rotation was prognostic for pitching arm injury. However, the cervical rotation test did not have prognostic value in this sample. Further research is required to assess the generalizability and scalability of neck range of motion assessment in relation to baseball shoulder and elbow injuries across different competition levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neck Range of Motion Prognostic Factors in Association to Shoulder and Elbow Injuries in Professional Baseball Pitchers.\",\"authors\":\"Garrett S Bullock, Charles A Thigpen, Hannah Zhao, Laurie Devaney, Daniel Kline, Thomas J Noonan, Michael J Kissenberth, Ellen Shanley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Authors have observed an association between cervical spine mobility and arm injury risk in baseball player; however, there is a need to assess the generalizability of cervical measurement data. Assessing the downstream of associations of cervical dysfunction on shoulder and elbow injuries can inform clinical interventions to help reduce future arm injuries. The purpose of this study was to assess the generalizability of neck range of motion measures as arm injury prognostic factors in professional baseball pitchers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of professional baseball pitchers in one Major League Baseball Organization was performed. Pitchers underwent pre-season neck range of motion including cervical flexion, extension, rotation, lateral flexion, and the flexion-rotation test (CFRT) and were followed for the season. The outcome was the occurrence of shoulder or elbow injury. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed and reported as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 pitchers were included (Age: 24.2 (2.4); Left-Handed: 21 (23%); Fastball Velocity: 92.3 (1.8)), with 15,942 athlete exposure days collected over the season. Pitcher neck range of motion was assessed (Flexion: 64 (10); Extension: 69 (11); Difference in Lateral Flexion: -1 (7); Difference in Neck Rotation: -2 (9); Difference in CFRT: -1 (7)). A total of 20 arm injuries (Shoulder: 9 (10%); Elbow: 11 (13%); Combined Rate: 1.3 (95% CI: 0.7, 1.7) per 1000 exposure days) were suffered by pitchers during the season. For every degree increase in the difference in dominant (rotating to dominant shoulder) versus non-dominant (rotating to non-dominant shoulder) neck rotation, there was a four-fold increase in arm injury hazard (HR: 4.0 (95% CI: 1.1, 13.9), p = 0.031). No other neck measurements demonstrated prognostic value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A deficit in dominant versus non-dominant neck rotation was prognostic for pitching arm injury. However, the cervical rotation test did not have prognostic value in this sample. Further research is required to assess the generalizability and scalability of neck range of motion assessment in relation to baseball shoulder and elbow injuries across different competition levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:作者观察到,棒球运动员的颈椎活动度与手臂受伤风险之间存在关联;但是,有必要评估颈椎测量数据的普遍性。评估颈椎功能障碍对肩部和肘部损伤的下游关联可以为临床干预提供信息,帮助减少未来的手臂损伤。本研究旨在评估颈部运动范围测量作为职业棒球投手手臂损伤预后因素的普遍性:方法:对一个美国职业棒球大联盟组织的职业棒球投手进行了前瞻性队列研究。投手们在赛季前进行了颈部活动范围测试,包括颈椎屈曲、伸展、旋转、侧屈和屈旋测试(CFRT),并在整个赛季中接受跟踪调查。结果是发生肩部或肘部损伤。进行了 Cox 比例危险分析,并以危险比(HR)和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)进行报告:共纳入 88 名投手(年龄:24.2 (2.4);左撇子:21 (23%);快球速度:92.3 (1.8)),整个赛季共收集到 15,942 个运动员接触日。对投手颈部的活动范围进行了评估(屈伸:64(10);伸展:68(10)):64 (10);伸展:69 (11);侧屈差异:-1 (7);颈部差异:-1 (7):-1(7);颈部旋转差异:-2(9);CFRT差异:-1(7))。共有 20 例手臂损伤(肩部9(10%);肘部11 (13%);综合受伤率:1.3 (95% CI)投手在赛季中每 1000 个接触日中有 1.3 次(95% CI:0.7,1.7)手臂受伤。优势肩(向优势肩旋转)与非优势肩(向非优势肩旋转)颈部旋转的差异每增加一度,手臂受伤的风险就增加四倍(HR:4.0 (95% CI: 1.1, 13.9),p = 0.031)。其他颈部测量结果均不具有预后价值:结论:优势颈部旋转相对于非优势颈部旋转的缺陷是投球手臂受伤的预后因素。然而,在该样本中,颈椎旋转测试并不具有预后价值。还需要进一步的研究来评估颈部运动范围评估在不同比赛级别中对棒球肩部和肘部损伤的普遍性和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neck Range of Motion Prognostic Factors in Association to Shoulder and Elbow Injuries in Professional Baseball Pitchers.

Background: Authors have observed an association between cervical spine mobility and arm injury risk in baseball player; however, there is a need to assess the generalizability of cervical measurement data. Assessing the downstream of associations of cervical dysfunction on shoulder and elbow injuries can inform clinical interventions to help reduce future arm injuries. The purpose of this study was to assess the generalizability of neck range of motion measures as arm injury prognostic factors in professional baseball pitchers.

Methods: A prospective cohort of professional baseball pitchers in one Major League Baseball Organization was performed. Pitchers underwent pre-season neck range of motion including cervical flexion, extension, rotation, lateral flexion, and the flexion-rotation test (CFRT) and were followed for the season. The outcome was the occurrence of shoulder or elbow injury. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed and reported as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results: A total of 88 pitchers were included (Age: 24.2 (2.4); Left-Handed: 21 (23%); Fastball Velocity: 92.3 (1.8)), with 15,942 athlete exposure days collected over the season. Pitcher neck range of motion was assessed (Flexion: 64 (10); Extension: 69 (11); Difference in Lateral Flexion: -1 (7); Difference in Neck Rotation: -2 (9); Difference in CFRT: -1 (7)). A total of 20 arm injuries (Shoulder: 9 (10%); Elbow: 11 (13%); Combined Rate: 1.3 (95% CI: 0.7, 1.7) per 1000 exposure days) were suffered by pitchers during the season. For every degree increase in the difference in dominant (rotating to dominant shoulder) versus non-dominant (rotating to non-dominant shoulder) neck rotation, there was a four-fold increase in arm injury hazard (HR: 4.0 (95% CI: 1.1, 13.9), p = 0.031). No other neck measurements demonstrated prognostic value.

Conclusions: A deficit in dominant versus non-dominant neck rotation was prognostic for pitching arm injury. However, the cervical rotation test did not have prognostic value in this sample. Further research is required to assess the generalizability and scalability of neck range of motion assessment in relation to baseball shoulder and elbow injuries across different competition levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
After primary shoulder arthroplasty appropriate vancomycin antibiotic prophylaxis does not lead to increased infectious complications when compared to cefazolin. Lateralization of the humerus in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: can preoperative planning software predict postoperative lateralization and does lateralization influence outcomes? Pathological formation of subcoracoid bursa effusion on magnetic resonance imaging studies. Pain Relief Survivorship: A Comparison of Exactech Equinoxe Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis. Tyrolean Iceman's arrow injury to the shoulder: New insights into extent and survival time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1