对怀疑小肠出血的血液透析患者和非血液透析患者进行胶囊内镜检查:一项前瞻性横断面研究。

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Hippokratia Pub Date : 2024-01-01
A Smyrlis, D Kogias, A Chalkidou, S Panagoutsos, K Kantartzi, V Papadopoulos, K Mimidis
{"title":"对怀疑小肠出血的血液透析患者和非血液透析患者进行胶囊内镜检查:一项前瞻性横断面研究。","authors":"A Smyrlis, D Kogias, A Chalkidou, S Panagoutsos, K Kantartzi, V Papadopoulos, K Mimidis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is common among hemodialysis (HD) patients. Endoscopic examination of the upper and lower GI tract often fails to identify hemorrhagic lesions in anemic HD patients. The study aims to evaluate lesions of the small bowel mucosa in HD vs non-HD patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding (SSBB) using capsule endoscopy (CE) after negative upper and lower GI endoscopies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cross-sectional study included all consecutive patients presenting with occult GI bleeding at the Dialysis Unit (HD patients) and the Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic (non-HD patients) of the University Hospital of Alexandroupolis. Within a pre-specified period of 13 months (01/07/2022 to 31/07/2023), we collected all relevant demographic data, laboratory parameters, comorbidity records, treatment profiles, and endoscopic findings. We used univariate and optimal scaling multivariate analyses to evaluate all parameters correlating with CE findings and Rhemitt score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 100 patients (25 HD and 75 non-HD). Considering any lesion (oozing blood, red spots, angiodysplasias, and erosive/ulcerative lesions) at any site (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) as separate binary variables, the prevalence per patient was superior in HD patients (3.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.3 ± 1.4; p <0.001). More specifically, endoscopic capsule findings in HD vs non-HD patients identified oozing blood (28 % vs 15 %; p =0.133), red spots (96 % vs 44 %; p <0.001), angiodysplasias (32 % vs 9 %; p =0.006), and erosive/ulcerative lesions (64 % vs 24 %; p <0.001). In 25 non-HD patients, no findings were observed (p =0.001). The number of total endoscopic findings was independently correlated with dialysis (p <0.001), male sex (p =0.048), dyslipidemia (p =0.004), liver disease (p =0.001), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (p =0.015). Lastly, we found that HD patients rebleed more often (Rhemitt score 6.5 ± 1.4 vs 2.9 ± 2.1; p <0.001). The Rhemitt score was independently correlated with dialysis (p <0.001), body mass index (p =0.024), MCV (p <0.001), smoking (p <0.001), dyslipidemia (p =0.007), GI bleeding (p <0.001), Calcium channel blockers (p =0.023), and preparation (p =0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with non-HD patients, HD patients who were investigated for potential GI bleeding demonstrated more severe and frequent small intestinal lesions with a higher probability of rebleeding. HIPPOKRATIA 2024, 28 (1):22-28.</p>","PeriodicalId":50405,"journal":{"name":"Hippokratia","volume":"28 1","pages":"22-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capsule endoscopy in hemodialysis versus non-hemodialysis patients with suspected small bowel bleeding: a prospective cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"A Smyrlis, D Kogias, A Chalkidou, S Panagoutsos, K Kantartzi, V Papadopoulos, K Mimidis\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is common among hemodialysis (HD) patients. Endoscopic examination of the upper and lower GI tract often fails to identify hemorrhagic lesions in anemic HD patients. The study aims to evaluate lesions of the small bowel mucosa in HD vs non-HD patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding (SSBB) using capsule endoscopy (CE) after negative upper and lower GI endoscopies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cross-sectional study included all consecutive patients presenting with occult GI bleeding at the Dialysis Unit (HD patients) and the Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic (non-HD patients) of the University Hospital of Alexandroupolis. Within a pre-specified period of 13 months (01/07/2022 to 31/07/2023), we collected all relevant demographic data, laboratory parameters, comorbidity records, treatment profiles, and endoscopic findings. We used univariate and optimal scaling multivariate analyses to evaluate all parameters correlating with CE findings and Rhemitt score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 100 patients (25 HD and 75 non-HD). Considering any lesion (oozing blood, red spots, angiodysplasias, and erosive/ulcerative lesions) at any site (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) as separate binary variables, the prevalence per patient was superior in HD patients (3.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.3 ± 1.4; p <0.001). More specifically, endoscopic capsule findings in HD vs non-HD patients identified oozing blood (28 % vs 15 %; p =0.133), red spots (96 % vs 44 %; p <0.001), angiodysplasias (32 % vs 9 %; p =0.006), and erosive/ulcerative lesions (64 % vs 24 %; p <0.001). In 25 non-HD patients, no findings were observed (p =0.001). The number of total endoscopic findings was independently correlated with dialysis (p <0.001), male sex (p =0.048), dyslipidemia (p =0.004), liver disease (p =0.001), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (p =0.015). Lastly, we found that HD patients rebleed more often (Rhemitt score 6.5 ± 1.4 vs 2.9 ± 2.1; p <0.001). The Rhemitt score was independently correlated with dialysis (p <0.001), body mass index (p =0.024), MCV (p <0.001), smoking (p <0.001), dyslipidemia (p =0.007), GI bleeding (p <0.001), Calcium channel blockers (p =0.023), and preparation (p =0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with non-HD patients, HD patients who were investigated for potential GI bleeding demonstrated more severe and frequent small intestinal lesions with a higher probability of rebleeding. HIPPOKRATIA 2024, 28 (1):22-28.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hippokratia\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"22-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hippokratia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hippokratia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:消化道出血在血液透析(HD)患者中很常见。在贫血的血液透析患者中,上消化道和下消化道的内窥镜检查往往不能发现出血病变。本研究旨在评估上、下消化道内镜检查阴性后,使用胶囊内镜(CE)检查疑似小肠出血(SSBB)的血液透析患者与非血液透析患者的小肠粘膜病变情况:这项前瞻性横断面研究包括亚历山德鲁波利斯大学医院透析室(HD 患者)和消化内科门诊(非 HD 患者)所有连续出现的隐匿性消化道出血患者。在预先规定的 13 个月内(2022 年 7 月 1 日至 2023 年 7 月 31 日),我们收集了所有相关人口统计学数据、实验室参数、合并症记录、治疗概况和内窥镜检查结果。我们采用单变量和最佳比例多变量分析来评估与 CE 结果和 Rhemitt 评分相关的所有参数:研究共纳入 100 名患者(25 名 HD 患者和 75 名非 HD 患者)。将任何部位(十二指肠、空肠和回肠)的任何病变(渗血、红斑、血管增生和侵蚀性/溃疡性病变)作为单独的二元变量考虑,HD 患者的人均患病率更高(3.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.3 ± 1.4;P 结论:与非 HD 患者相比,HD 患者的人均患病率更高(3.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.3 ± 1.4;P 结论:与非 HD 患者相比,HD 患者的人均患病率更高(3.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.3 ± 1.4;P 结论):与非 HD 患者相比,接受潜在消化道出血检查的 HD 患者的小肠病变更严重、更频繁,再出血的概率更高。Hippokratia 2024, 28 (1):22-28.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Capsule endoscopy in hemodialysis versus non-hemodialysis patients with suspected small bowel bleeding: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is common among hemodialysis (HD) patients. Endoscopic examination of the upper and lower GI tract often fails to identify hemorrhagic lesions in anemic HD patients. The study aims to evaluate lesions of the small bowel mucosa in HD vs non-HD patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding (SSBB) using capsule endoscopy (CE) after negative upper and lower GI endoscopies.

Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included all consecutive patients presenting with occult GI bleeding at the Dialysis Unit (HD patients) and the Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic (non-HD patients) of the University Hospital of Alexandroupolis. Within a pre-specified period of 13 months (01/07/2022 to 31/07/2023), we collected all relevant demographic data, laboratory parameters, comorbidity records, treatment profiles, and endoscopic findings. We used univariate and optimal scaling multivariate analyses to evaluate all parameters correlating with CE findings and Rhemitt score.

Results: The study included 100 patients (25 HD and 75 non-HD). Considering any lesion (oozing blood, red spots, angiodysplasias, and erosive/ulcerative lesions) at any site (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) as separate binary variables, the prevalence per patient was superior in HD patients (3.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.3 ± 1.4; p <0.001). More specifically, endoscopic capsule findings in HD vs non-HD patients identified oozing blood (28 % vs 15 %; p =0.133), red spots (96 % vs 44 %; p <0.001), angiodysplasias (32 % vs 9 %; p =0.006), and erosive/ulcerative lesions (64 % vs 24 %; p <0.001). In 25 non-HD patients, no findings were observed (p =0.001). The number of total endoscopic findings was independently correlated with dialysis (p <0.001), male sex (p =0.048), dyslipidemia (p =0.004), liver disease (p =0.001), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (p =0.015). Lastly, we found that HD patients rebleed more often (Rhemitt score 6.5 ± 1.4 vs 2.9 ± 2.1; p <0.001). The Rhemitt score was independently correlated with dialysis (p <0.001), body mass index (p =0.024), MCV (p <0.001), smoking (p <0.001), dyslipidemia (p =0.007), GI bleeding (p <0.001), Calcium channel blockers (p =0.023), and preparation (p =0.001).

Conclusion: Compared with non-HD patients, HD patients who were investigated for potential GI bleeding demonstrated more severe and frequent small intestinal lesions with a higher probability of rebleeding. HIPPOKRATIA 2024, 28 (1):22-28.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hippokratia
Hippokratia MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hippokratia journal is a quarterly issued, open access, peer reviewed, general medical journal, published in Thessaloniki, Greece. It is a forum for all medical specialties. The journal is published continuously since 1997, its official language is English and all submitted manuscripts undergo peer review by two independent reviewers, assigned by the Editor (double blinded review process). Hippokratia journal is managed by its Editorial Board and has an International Advisory Committee and over 500 expert Reviewers covering all medical specialties and additionally Technical Reviewers, Statisticians, Image processing Experts and a journal Secretary. The Society “Friends of Hippokratia Journal” has the financial management of both the printed and electronic edition of the journal.
期刊最新文献
A rare case of trisomy 13 mosaicism with only findings on first-trimester ultrasound single umbilical artery and increased nuchal translucency. Adolescent pregnancy and anemia. Ten years of referrals in Northern Greece. An artificial neural network approach to diagnose and predict liver dysfunction and failure in the critical care setting. Capsule endoscopy in hemodialysis versus non-hemodialysis patients with suspected small bowel bleeding: a prospective cross-sectional study. Horner's syndrome as an unusual complication of retropharyngeal schwannoma excision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1