{"title":"在感知种族主义、病人与医护人员沟通和医疗保健利用方面的种族差异:亚裔美国人。","authors":"Zhiwen Xiao, Allen Wu","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2024.2412853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Race is a consequential sociocultural cue in healthcare contexts. Racism is associated with health disparities by influencing patient-provider communication and utilization of healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate how Asian American subgroups differ in their perception of everyday racism, internalized racism, and perceived racism in healthcare settings and whether these perceptions predict their interactions with their health care providers and their utilization of healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey study was conducted. ANOVA tests were employed to compare the differences in perceptions of everyday racism, internalized racism, and perceived racism in the healthcare system among Filipino (<i>N</i> = 310), Japanese (<i>N</i> = 242), Chinese (<i>N</i> = 287), Asian Indian (<i>N</i> = 304), Korean (<i>N</i> = 199) and Vietnamese (<i>N</i> = 151) participants. Multiple regression analyses assessed whether perceptions of everyday racism, internalized racism, and perceived racism in the healthcare system predicted healthcare service utilization and patient-provider communication among the Asian subgroups sampled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant group differences in perceived everyday racism (<i>F</i> = 8.56, <i>p</i> < .001), internalized racism (<i>F</i> = 3.46, <i>p</i> < .01), perceived racism in healthcare (<i>F</i> = 4.57, <i>p</i> < .001). Perceptions of racism and socioeconomic variables were found to predict patient-provider communication and utilization of healthcare services disparately across various Asian subgroups. For instance, the perception of everyday racism was a significant predictor of patient-provider communication for each of the subgroups, excluding the Vietnamese participants. Internalized racism was a significant predictor only for Filipino and Chinese participants. Surprisingly, perceived racism in healthcare was not a predictor for any of the subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight the complex interplay of sociodemographic factors and perceived racism in shaping patient-provider communication and healthcare service utilization within the Asian American community. Implications are suggested for addressing the unique challenges faced by different Asian American subgroups and for promoting equitable healthcare access and fostering positive patient-provider relationships among the Asian American subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnic disparities in perceived racism, patient-provider communication and healthcare utilization: Asian Americans.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiwen Xiao, Allen Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13557858.2024.2412853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Race is a consequential sociocultural cue in healthcare contexts. Racism is associated with health disparities by influencing patient-provider communication and utilization of healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate how Asian American subgroups differ in their perception of everyday racism, internalized racism, and perceived racism in healthcare settings and whether these perceptions predict their interactions with their health care providers and their utilization of healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey study was conducted. ANOVA tests were employed to compare the differences in perceptions of everyday racism, internalized racism, and perceived racism in the healthcare system among Filipino (<i>N</i> = 310), Japanese (<i>N</i> = 242), Chinese (<i>N</i> = 287), Asian Indian (<i>N</i> = 304), Korean (<i>N</i> = 199) and Vietnamese (<i>N</i> = 151) participants. Multiple regression analyses assessed whether perceptions of everyday racism, internalized racism, and perceived racism in the healthcare system predicted healthcare service utilization and patient-provider communication among the Asian subgroups sampled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant group differences in perceived everyday racism (<i>F</i> = 8.56, <i>p</i> < .001), internalized racism (<i>F</i> = 3.46, <i>p</i> < .01), perceived racism in healthcare (<i>F</i> = 4.57, <i>p</i> < .001). Perceptions of racism and socioeconomic variables were found to predict patient-provider communication and utilization of healthcare services disparately across various Asian subgroups. For instance, the perception of everyday racism was a significant predictor of patient-provider communication for each of the subgroups, excluding the Vietnamese participants. Internalized racism was a significant predictor only for Filipino and Chinese participants. Surprisingly, perceived racism in healthcare was not a predictor for any of the subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight the complex interplay of sociodemographic factors and perceived racism in shaping patient-provider communication and healthcare service utilization within the Asian American community. Implications are suggested for addressing the unique challenges faced by different Asian American subgroups and for promoting equitable healthcare access and fostering positive patient-provider relationships among the Asian American subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnicity & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnicity & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2412853\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2412853","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:种族是医疗保健环境中一个重要的社会文化线索。种族主义会影响患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通以及医疗服务的使用,从而与健康差异相关联:本研究旨在调查亚裔美国人亚群体对医疗环境中的日常种族主义、内化种族主义和感知种族主义的感知有何不同,以及这些感知是否会影响他们与医疗服务提供者的互动和对医疗服务的利用:方法: 我们进行了一项在线调查研究。采用方差分析检验比较了菲律宾人(310人)、日本人(242人)、中国人(287人)、亚洲印第安人(304人)、韩国人(199人)和越南人(151人)对日常种族主义、内化种族主义和医疗系统中的种族主义认知的差异。多元回归分析评估了日常种族主义感知、内化种族主义感知和医疗系统中的种族主义感知是否能预测所抽样调查的亚裔亚群的医疗服务利用率和医患沟通情况:结果:亚裔亚群在感知到的日常种族主义方面存在明显的群体差异(F = 8.56,p F = 3.46,p F = 4.57,p 结论:亚裔亚群在感知到的日常种族主义方面存在明显的群体差异:研究结果凸显了在亚裔美国人社区中,社会人口因素和感知到的种族主义在影响患者与医护人员沟通和医疗服务利用方面的复杂相互作用。研究结果对解决不同亚裔美国人亚群体所面临的独特挑战、促进亚裔美国人亚群体公平地获得医疗保健服务以及培养积极的患者-医疗服务提供者关系具有重要意义。
Ethnic disparities in perceived racism, patient-provider communication and healthcare utilization: Asian Americans.
Background: Race is a consequential sociocultural cue in healthcare contexts. Racism is associated with health disparities by influencing patient-provider communication and utilization of healthcare services.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate how Asian American subgroups differ in their perception of everyday racism, internalized racism, and perceived racism in healthcare settings and whether these perceptions predict their interactions with their health care providers and their utilization of healthcare services.
Methods: An online survey study was conducted. ANOVA tests were employed to compare the differences in perceptions of everyday racism, internalized racism, and perceived racism in the healthcare system among Filipino (N = 310), Japanese (N = 242), Chinese (N = 287), Asian Indian (N = 304), Korean (N = 199) and Vietnamese (N = 151) participants. Multiple regression analyses assessed whether perceptions of everyday racism, internalized racism, and perceived racism in the healthcare system predicted healthcare service utilization and patient-provider communication among the Asian subgroups sampled.
Results: There were significant group differences in perceived everyday racism (F = 8.56, p < .001), internalized racism (F = 3.46, p < .01), perceived racism in healthcare (F = 4.57, p < .001). Perceptions of racism and socioeconomic variables were found to predict patient-provider communication and utilization of healthcare services disparately across various Asian subgroups. For instance, the perception of everyday racism was a significant predictor of patient-provider communication for each of the subgroups, excluding the Vietnamese participants. Internalized racism was a significant predictor only for Filipino and Chinese participants. Surprisingly, perceived racism in healthcare was not a predictor for any of the subgroups.
Conclusion: Findings highlight the complex interplay of sociodemographic factors and perceived racism in shaping patient-provider communication and healthcare service utilization within the Asian American community. Implications are suggested for addressing the unique challenges faced by different Asian American subgroups and for promoting equitable healthcare access and fostering positive patient-provider relationships among the Asian American subgroups.
期刊介绍:
Ethnicity & Health
is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.