{"title":"如何利用实施研究促进全球卫生公平。","authors":"Olakunle Alonge","doi":"10.1186/s41256-024-00388-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implementation research (IR) is important for addressing equity in global health. However, there is limited knowledge on how to operationalize IR for health equity, and pathways for improving health equity through IR in global health settings. This paper provides an overview of guidance and frameworks for thinking about health equity as part of IR while noting the gaps in how this guidance and frameworks apply to global health. It proposes an approach to guide implementation teams in the application of IR for achieving equity in global health considering these gaps. It describes key equity considerations for different aspects of IR (i.e., implementation contexts, strategies, outcomes, and research designs). These considerations can be applied prospectively and retrospectively, and at different stages of IR. The paper further describes causal pathways, intervention levers, and strategies for achieving health equity in global health settings through IR. Central to these pathways is the power asymmetries among different actors involved in IR in global health and how these contribute to health inequities. The paper suggests recommendations and strategies for shifting the balance of power among these actors while addressing the structural and systemic determinants of health inequities as part of IR. Explicit considerations for health equity as part of implementation research and practice are needed for the achievement of global health goals. Such explicit considerations should look back as much as possible, and entail defining and analyzing health inequities and intervening on the underlying causes and mechanisms of health inequities as part of IR on a routine basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to leverage implementation research for equity in global health.\",\"authors\":\"Olakunle Alonge\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41256-024-00388-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Implementation research (IR) is important for addressing equity in global health. However, there is limited knowledge on how to operationalize IR for health equity, and pathways for improving health equity through IR in global health settings. This paper provides an overview of guidance and frameworks for thinking about health equity as part of IR while noting the gaps in how this guidance and frameworks apply to global health. It proposes an approach to guide implementation teams in the application of IR for achieving equity in global health considering these gaps. It describes key equity considerations for different aspects of IR (i.e., implementation contexts, strategies, outcomes, and research designs). These considerations can be applied prospectively and retrospectively, and at different stages of IR. The paper further describes causal pathways, intervention levers, and strategies for achieving health equity in global health settings through IR. Central to these pathways is the power asymmetries among different actors involved in IR in global health and how these contribute to health inequities. The paper suggests recommendations and strategies for shifting the balance of power among these actors while addressing the structural and systemic determinants of health inequities as part of IR. Explicit considerations for health equity as part of implementation research and practice are needed for the achievement of global health goals. Such explicit considerations should look back as much as possible, and entail defining and analyzing health inequities and intervening on the underlying causes and mechanisms of health inequities as part of IR on a routine basis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00388-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00388-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
实施研究(IR)对于解决全球卫生领域的公平问题非常重要。然而,对于如何操作实施研究以促进健康公平,以及在全球卫生环境中通过实施研究改善健康公平的途径,人们的了解还很有限。本文概述了将健康公平作为 IR 的一部分进行思考的指南和框架,同时指出了这些指南和框架在如何应用于全球卫生方面存在的差距。考虑到这些差距,本文提出了一种方法来指导实施团队应用 IR 实现全球卫生领域的公平。它描述了针对 IR 不同方面(即实施背景、策略、结果和研究设计)的关键公平考虑因素。这些考虑因素可以前瞻性地、回顾性地应用于 IR 的不同阶段。本文进一步阐述了在全球卫生环境中通过IR实现卫生公平的因果途径、干预杠杆和策略。这些途径的核心是参与全球卫生领域 IR 的不同参与者之间的权力不对称,以及这些不对称是如何导致卫生不公平的。本文提出了一些建议和策略,以改变这些参与者之间的权力平衡,同时解决作为投资者关系一部分的健康不平等的结构性和系统性决定因素。要实现全球卫生目标,就需要在实施研究和实践中明确考虑卫生公平问题。这种明确的考虑应尽可能往后看,需要界定和分析卫生不公平现象,并对卫生不公平现象的根本原因和机制进行干预,将其作为常规性 IR 的一部分。
How to leverage implementation research for equity in global health.
Implementation research (IR) is important for addressing equity in global health. However, there is limited knowledge on how to operationalize IR for health equity, and pathways for improving health equity through IR in global health settings. This paper provides an overview of guidance and frameworks for thinking about health equity as part of IR while noting the gaps in how this guidance and frameworks apply to global health. It proposes an approach to guide implementation teams in the application of IR for achieving equity in global health considering these gaps. It describes key equity considerations for different aspects of IR (i.e., implementation contexts, strategies, outcomes, and research designs). These considerations can be applied prospectively and retrospectively, and at different stages of IR. The paper further describes causal pathways, intervention levers, and strategies for achieving health equity in global health settings through IR. Central to these pathways is the power asymmetries among different actors involved in IR in global health and how these contribute to health inequities. The paper suggests recommendations and strategies for shifting the balance of power among these actors while addressing the structural and systemic determinants of health inequities as part of IR. Explicit considerations for health equity as part of implementation research and practice are needed for the achievement of global health goals. Such explicit considerations should look back as much as possible, and entail defining and analyzing health inequities and intervening on the underlying causes and mechanisms of health inequities as part of IR on a routine basis.
期刊介绍:
Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.