全科医生与其他私人门诊专科医生开具的可替代药物的非专利配药率比较:基于法国国家报销数据库的研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2024.2407600
Hugo Figoni, Sarah Robert, Kim Bonello, Gladys Ibanez, Julie Chastang, Candice Estellat
{"title":"全科医生与其他私人门诊专科医生开具的可替代药物的非专利配药率比较:基于法国国家报销数据库的研究。","authors":"Hugo Figoni, Sarah Robert, Kim Bonello, Gladys Ibanez, Julie Chastang, Candice Estellat","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2024.2407600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of generic drugs is a way for healthcare systems to reduce costs, particularly in ambulatory care. Several studies suggest that the prescriber's speciality is associated with the use of generic drugs, and that substitutable drugs prescribed by General Practitioners (GPs) are more often generic, but this association has never been studied in France. In the French legislative context, except in rare situations, all substitutable drugs prescribed should be dispensed in generic form.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare the generic drugs dispensing rate among substitutable drugs dispensed in community pharmacies prescribed by French private GPs with that of other private specialists, all other specialities combined (first objective) or each other speciality taken individually (second objective).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a sample of an open available semi-aggregated database from the 2019 French health insurance system database. We compared with logistic regression models GPs to all other specialities combined, then GPs to the 19 other specialties taken individually, only on the substitutable drugs they prescribe in common.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2019, 53.4% of the drugs prescribed by French private ambulatory physicians were substitutable drugs, and 81.5% of them were dispensed in generic form. After adjustment, the generic dispensing rate for substitutable drugs was significantly higher for GPs than for other specialties (ORa 0.74 [IC95% 0.72-0.76]). Thirteen of the nineteen other specialities taken individually, such as endocrinologists (ORa 0.64 [IC95% 0.57-0.72]) and cardiologists (ORa 0.60 [0.56-0.63]) had significantly lower generic dispensing rates than GPs. No other speciality had a rate significantly higher than GPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substitutable drugs prescribed by French private GPs are more often dispensed in generic form than those from other private ambulatory specialties. To understand this result and optimise the use of generic drugs in outpatient settings, we need to study the different stages of drug use, from prescription by the physician to dispensing by the pharmacist and acceptance by the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generic dispensing rates for substitutable drugs prescribed by general practitioners compared with other private ambulatory specialists: A study based on a French national reimbursement database.\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Figoni, Sarah Robert, Kim Bonello, Gladys Ibanez, Julie Chastang, Candice Estellat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13814788.2024.2407600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of generic drugs is a way for healthcare systems to reduce costs, particularly in ambulatory care. Several studies suggest that the prescriber's speciality is associated with the use of generic drugs, and that substitutable drugs prescribed by General Practitioners (GPs) are more often generic, but this association has never been studied in France. In the French legislative context, except in rare situations, all substitutable drugs prescribed should be dispensed in generic form.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare the generic drugs dispensing rate among substitutable drugs dispensed in community pharmacies prescribed by French private GPs with that of other private specialists, all other specialities combined (first objective) or each other speciality taken individually (second objective).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a sample of an open available semi-aggregated database from the 2019 French health insurance system database. We compared with logistic regression models GPs to all other specialities combined, then GPs to the 19 other specialties taken individually, only on the substitutable drugs they prescribe in common.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2019, 53.4% of the drugs prescribed by French private ambulatory physicians were substitutable drugs, and 81.5% of them were dispensed in generic form. After adjustment, the generic dispensing rate for substitutable drugs was significantly higher for GPs than for other specialties (ORa 0.74 [IC95% 0.72-0.76]). Thirteen of the nineteen other specialities taken individually, such as endocrinologists (ORa 0.64 [IC95% 0.57-0.72]) and cardiologists (ORa 0.60 [0.56-0.63]) had significantly lower generic dispensing rates than GPs. No other speciality had a rate significantly higher than GPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substitutable drugs prescribed by French private GPs are more often dispensed in generic form than those from other private ambulatory specialties. To understand this result and optimise the use of generic drugs in outpatient settings, we need to study the different stages of drug use, from prescription by the physician to dispensing by the pharmacist and acceptance by the patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486039/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2024.2407600\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2024.2407600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用非专利药是医疗系统降低成本的一种方式,尤其是在非住院医疗中。多项研究表明,处方者的专业与非专利药的使用有关,而全科医生(GP)开具的可替代药物处方更多使用非专利药,但法国从未对这种关联进行过研究。在法国的立法背景下,除极少数情况外,所有可替代药物处方均应以非专利形式配发:比较法国私人全科医生与其他私人专科医生、所有其他专科医生(第一目标)或其他各专科医生(第二目标)在社区药房开具的可替代药物中的非专利药配药率:我们使用了 2019 年法国医疗保险系统数据库中一个公开的半汇总数据库样本。我们用逻辑回归模型比较了全科医生与所有其他专科的总和,然后比较了全科医生与其他19个专科的单独情况,仅比较了他们共同开具的可替代药物:2019年,法国私人门诊医生处方的药物中有53.4%为可替代药物,其中81.5%以仿制药形式配发。经调整后,全科医生的可替代药物仿制药配药率明显高于其他专科医生(ORa 0.74 [IC95% 0.72-0.76])。在 19 个其他专科中,有 13 个专科(如内分泌科医生(ORa 0.64 [IC95% 0.57-0.72])和心脏病医生(ORa 0.60 [0.56-0.63])的非专利药配药率明显低于全科医生。其他专科医生的配药率均明显低于全科医生:法国私人全科医生开具的可替代药物的非专利配药率高于其他私人门诊专科医生。要理解这一结果并优化非专利药在门诊环境中的使用,我们需要研究药物使用的不同阶段,从医生开处方到药剂师配药再到患者接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generic dispensing rates for substitutable drugs prescribed by general practitioners compared with other private ambulatory specialists: A study based on a French national reimbursement database.

Background: The use of generic drugs is a way for healthcare systems to reduce costs, particularly in ambulatory care. Several studies suggest that the prescriber's speciality is associated with the use of generic drugs, and that substitutable drugs prescribed by General Practitioners (GPs) are more often generic, but this association has never been studied in France. In the French legislative context, except in rare situations, all substitutable drugs prescribed should be dispensed in generic form.

Objectives: Compare the generic drugs dispensing rate among substitutable drugs dispensed in community pharmacies prescribed by French private GPs with that of other private specialists, all other specialities combined (first objective) or each other speciality taken individually (second objective).

Methods: We used a sample of an open available semi-aggregated database from the 2019 French health insurance system database. We compared with logistic regression models GPs to all other specialities combined, then GPs to the 19 other specialties taken individually, only on the substitutable drugs they prescribe in common.

Results: In 2019, 53.4% of the drugs prescribed by French private ambulatory physicians were substitutable drugs, and 81.5% of them were dispensed in generic form. After adjustment, the generic dispensing rate for substitutable drugs was significantly higher for GPs than for other specialties (ORa 0.74 [IC95% 0.72-0.76]). Thirteen of the nineteen other specialities taken individually, such as endocrinologists (ORa 0.64 [IC95% 0.57-0.72]) and cardiologists (ORa 0.60 [0.56-0.63]) had significantly lower generic dispensing rates than GPs. No other speciality had a rate significantly higher than GPs.

Conclusions: Substitutable drugs prescribed by French private GPs are more often dispensed in generic form than those from other private ambulatory specialties. To understand this result and optimise the use of generic drugs in outpatient settings, we need to study the different stages of drug use, from prescription by the physician to dispensing by the pharmacist and acceptance by the patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
期刊最新文献
Democratising the design and delivery of large-scale randomised, controlled clinical trials in primary care: A personal view. Diagnostic flow for all patients referred with non-specific symptoms of cancer to a diagnostic centre in Denmark: A descriptive study. Monitoring COVID-19 in Belgian general practice: A tool for syndromic surveillance based on electronic health records. Evaluation of the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the patient reported experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC)-Compact questionnaire. The experiences of transgender and nonbinary adults in primary care: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1