急诊科为老年人提供高剂量氯胺酮镇痛与低剂量氯胺酮镇痛的比较。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.015
Alexander D. Ginsburg M.D. , Heather A. Heaton M.D., M.S. , Aeryana Beaudrie-Nunn Pharm.D., R.Ph. , Lucas Oliveira J. e Silva M.D., Ph.D. , Elizabeth Canterbury Pharm.D., R.Ph. , Caitlin S. Brown Pharm.D., R.Ph. , Allyson K. Palmer M.D., Ph.D. , Kristin C. Cole M.S. , Erin D. Wieruszewski Pharm.D., R.Ph. , Fernanda Bellolio M.D., M.Sc.
{"title":"急诊科为老年人提供高剂量氯胺酮镇痛与低剂量氯胺酮镇痛的比较。","authors":"Alexander D. Ginsburg M.D. ,&nbsp;Heather A. Heaton M.D., M.S. ,&nbsp;Aeryana Beaudrie-Nunn Pharm.D., R.Ph. ,&nbsp;Lucas Oliveira J. e Silva M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Canterbury Pharm.D., R.Ph. ,&nbsp;Caitlin S. Brown Pharm.D., R.Ph. ,&nbsp;Allyson K. Palmer M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Kristin C. Cole M.S. ,&nbsp;Erin D. Wieruszewski Pharm.D., R.Ph. ,&nbsp;Fernanda Bellolio M.D., M.Sc.","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><div>Ketamine is increasingly being utilized in the management of acute pain in the emergency department (ED), including for older adults, a population at increased risk of adverse effects from medications. We aimed to compare the safety and analgesic effects of high-dose (≥0.3<!--> <!-->mg/kg) to low-dose (&lt;0.3<!--> <!-->mg/kg) intravenous (IV) ketamine among older ED patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multi-center, retrospective cohort study of adults ≥60<!--> <!-->years who received IV ketamine for pain between 2018 and 2021. The primary outcome was pain improvement as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score within 60<!--> <!-->min after administration. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects (early discontinuation, nausea, rescue benzodiazepines and intubation) and the need for rescue analgesia. Linear regression was used to assess the association between the change in NRS pain scores and dose after adjusting for baseline pain, requiring an additional dose of ketamine, and receiving an opioid.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 130 older adults received ketamine as an analgesic (37 high-dose, 93 low-dose). Median age was 69.2<!--> <!-->years, 52 % were women, 40 % had a history of substance use disorder. Prior to ketamine, 76 % received alternate analgesics and 23 % antiemetics. Baseline mean pain score was lower in the high-dose group (6.7 vs. 8.3, difference −1.7 [95 % CI −2.6 to −0.7], <em>p</em> = 0.013). Change in NRS pain scores were similar between the high-dose and low-dose groups (−2.4 [95 % CI −3.6 to −1.3] vs −1.6 [95 % CI −2.2 to −0.9], <em>p</em> = 0.27). After adjustment for baseline pain score, the high-dose group had a larger reduction in pain scores (−1.3 [95 % CI −2.6 to −0.1], <em>p</em> = 0.042) and percent change of pain (−23.8 % [95 % CI −42.1 % to −5.4 %], <em>p</em> = 0.012). There was no significant difference in rates of rescue analgesia (35.1 % vs. 44.1 %, <em>p</em> = 0.35) or early discontinuation (29.7 % vs. 32.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.78). Rates of adverse effects were similar.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>High-dose and low-dose ketamine reduced pain scores in older adults. High-dose ketamine led to a greater reduction in pain scores, and there was no observed difference in adverse effects or the need for rescue analgesia. One-third needed discontinuation of ketamine in both groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High- versus low-dose ketamine for analgesia in older adults in the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"Alexander D. Ginsburg M.D. ,&nbsp;Heather A. Heaton M.D., M.S. ,&nbsp;Aeryana Beaudrie-Nunn Pharm.D., R.Ph. ,&nbsp;Lucas Oliveira J. e Silva M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Canterbury Pharm.D., R.Ph. ,&nbsp;Caitlin S. Brown Pharm.D., R.Ph. ,&nbsp;Allyson K. Palmer M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Kristin C. Cole M.S. ,&nbsp;Erin D. Wieruszewski Pharm.D., R.Ph. ,&nbsp;Fernanda Bellolio M.D., M.Sc.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><div>Ketamine is increasingly being utilized in the management of acute pain in the emergency department (ED), including for older adults, a population at increased risk of adverse effects from medications. We aimed to compare the safety and analgesic effects of high-dose (≥0.3<!--> <!-->mg/kg) to low-dose (&lt;0.3<!--> <!-->mg/kg) intravenous (IV) ketamine among older ED patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multi-center, retrospective cohort study of adults ≥60<!--> <!-->years who received IV ketamine for pain between 2018 and 2021. The primary outcome was pain improvement as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score within 60<!--> <!-->min after administration. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects (early discontinuation, nausea, rescue benzodiazepines and intubation) and the need for rescue analgesia. Linear regression was used to assess the association between the change in NRS pain scores and dose after adjusting for baseline pain, requiring an additional dose of ketamine, and receiving an opioid.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 130 older adults received ketamine as an analgesic (37 high-dose, 93 low-dose). Median age was 69.2<!--> <!-->years, 52 % were women, 40 % had a history of substance use disorder. Prior to ketamine, 76 % received alternate analgesics and 23 % antiemetics. Baseline mean pain score was lower in the high-dose group (6.7 vs. 8.3, difference −1.7 [95 % CI −2.6 to −0.7], <em>p</em> = 0.013). Change in NRS pain scores were similar between the high-dose and low-dose groups (−2.4 [95 % CI −3.6 to −1.3] vs −1.6 [95 % CI −2.2 to −0.9], <em>p</em> = 0.27). After adjustment for baseline pain score, the high-dose group had a larger reduction in pain scores (−1.3 [95 % CI −2.6 to −0.1], <em>p</em> = 0.042) and percent change of pain (−23.8 % [95 % CI −42.1 % to −5.4 %], <em>p</em> = 0.012). There was no significant difference in rates of rescue analgesia (35.1 % vs. 44.1 %, <em>p</em> = 0.35) or early discontinuation (29.7 % vs. 32.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.78). Rates of adverse effects were similar.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>High-dose and low-dose ketamine reduced pain scores in older adults. High-dose ketamine led to a greater reduction in pain scores, and there was no observed difference in adverse effects or the need for rescue analgesia. One-third needed discontinuation of ketamine in both groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724005321\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724005321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:氯胺酮正越来越多地被用于急诊科(ED)急性疼痛的治疗,包括老年人,因为老年人因药物不良反应而增加的风险更大。我们的目的是比较大剂量(≥0.3 毫克/千克)和小剂量(方法:多中心回顾性研究)氯胺酮的安全性和镇痛效果:多中心、回顾性队列研究,对象为 2018 年至 2021 年间接受静脉注射氯胺酮治疗疼痛的≥60 岁成人。主要结果为用药后 60 分钟内通过数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分衡量的疼痛改善情况。次要结果包括不良反应(提前停药、恶心、苯二氮卓类药物抢救和插管)以及对抢救性镇痛的需求。在对基线疼痛、需要额外剂量氯胺酮和接受阿片类药物进行调整后,采用线性回归评估 NRS 疼痛评分变化与剂量之间的关系:共有 130 名老年人接受了氯胺酮镇痛(37 名高剂量,93 名低剂量)。中位年龄为 69.2 岁,52% 为女性,40% 有药物使用障碍史。在使用氯胺酮之前,76%的患者接受了替代镇痛药,23%的患者接受了止吐药。大剂量组的基线平均疼痛评分较低(6.7 对 8.3,差异-1.7 [95 % CI -2.6 to -0.7],P = 0.013)。高剂量组和低剂量组的 NRS 疼痛评分变化相似(-2.4 [95 % CI -3.6 to -1.3] vs -1.6 [95 % CI -2.2 to -0.9],p = 0.27)。对基线疼痛评分进行调整后,大剂量组的疼痛评分(-1.3 [95 % CI -2.6 to -0.1],p = 0.042)和疼痛变化百分比(-23.8 % [95 % CI -42.1 % to -5.4%],p = 0.012)降低幅度更大。抢救性镇痛率(35.1% 对 44.1%,p = 0.35)和提前停药率(29.7% 对 32.3%,p = 0.78)没有明显差异。不良反应发生率相似:结论:大剂量和小剂量氯胺酮都能降低老年人的疼痛评分。大剂量氯胺酮能更大程度地降低疼痛评分,而在不良反应或镇痛抢救需求方面没有观察到差异。两组中都有三分之一的人需要停用氯胺酮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High- versus low-dose ketamine for analgesia in older adults in the emergency department

Background and objectives

Ketamine is increasingly being utilized in the management of acute pain in the emergency department (ED), including for older adults, a population at increased risk of adverse effects from medications. We aimed to compare the safety and analgesic effects of high-dose (≥0.3 mg/kg) to low-dose (<0.3 mg/kg) intravenous (IV) ketamine among older ED patients.

Methods

Multi-center, retrospective cohort study of adults ≥60 years who received IV ketamine for pain between 2018 and 2021. The primary outcome was pain improvement as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score within 60 min after administration. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects (early discontinuation, nausea, rescue benzodiazepines and intubation) and the need for rescue analgesia. Linear regression was used to assess the association between the change in NRS pain scores and dose after adjusting for baseline pain, requiring an additional dose of ketamine, and receiving an opioid.

Results

A total of 130 older adults received ketamine as an analgesic (37 high-dose, 93 low-dose). Median age was 69.2 years, 52 % were women, 40 % had a history of substance use disorder. Prior to ketamine, 76 % received alternate analgesics and 23 % antiemetics. Baseline mean pain score was lower in the high-dose group (6.7 vs. 8.3, difference −1.7 [95 % CI −2.6 to −0.7], p = 0.013). Change in NRS pain scores were similar between the high-dose and low-dose groups (−2.4 [95 % CI −3.6 to −1.3] vs −1.6 [95 % CI −2.2 to −0.9], p = 0.27). After adjustment for baseline pain score, the high-dose group had a larger reduction in pain scores (−1.3 [95 % CI −2.6 to −0.1], p = 0.042) and percent change of pain (−23.8 % [95 % CI −42.1 % to −5.4 %], p = 0.012). There was no significant difference in rates of rescue analgesia (35.1 % vs. 44.1 %, p = 0.35) or early discontinuation (29.7 % vs. 32.3 %, p = 0.78). Rates of adverse effects were similar.

Conclusion

High-dose and low-dose ketamine reduced pain scores in older adults. High-dose ketamine led to a greater reduction in pain scores, and there was no observed difference in adverse effects or the need for rescue analgesia. One-third needed discontinuation of ketamine in both groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Hybrid warfare tactics and novel injury patterns in the Beirut pager explosions. Successful recovery of vision following intravenous thrombolysis using low-dose alteplase in central retinal artery occlusion. Crush syndrome and nitric oxide. Adenosine dose for supraventricular tachycardia. Comparative safety and efficacy of a hybrid intravenous and oral diltiazem protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1