Sara A Morgan, Steph Scott, Joht Chandan, Rachel Armitage, David Culliford, Kate Jolly, Ruth McGovern, William McGovern, Jessica Roy, Rasiah Thayakaran, Tracey A Young, Julie Parkes
{"title":"针对家庭暴力和虐待行为初犯的 \"警戒和关系虐待项目\"('CARA')提高认识讲习班的全国性评估:混合方法并行评估设计规程。","authors":"Sara A Morgan, Steph Scott, Joht Chandan, Rachel Armitage, David Culliford, Kate Jolly, Ruth McGovern, William McGovern, Jessica Roy, Rasiah Thayakaran, Tracey A Young, Julie Parkes","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13609.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interventions related to the perpetration of Domestic Violence and Abuse (DVA) have gained traction over the past several years, in response to dissatisfaction by victims, an inadequate response from the criminal justice system, increased demand on police time and a lack of rehabilitative responses to the perpetration of domestic abuse. The CARA model is a conditional diversionary caution, offered by police for first time offenders of 'standard' or 'medium risk' domestic abuse, that engages perpetrators in awareness raising workshops and signposts them onto further services. Although quasi-experimental studies have indicated that CARA showed promise at reducing reoffending, the CARA model has yet to be evaluated nationally and there is no qualitative evidence related to understanding or learning about the lived experience of perpetrators and victims as they engage with the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a concurrent pragmatic mixed methods design model we will undertake a national evaluation of CARA by triangulating quantitative data from up to nine police forces, and routine data from service providers, with qualitative data from workshop participants, victims and professional stakeholders to: (1) understand the long-term impact of CARA implementation on DVA reoffending and engagement with services and (2) explore perceptions and experiences of both delivery and receipt of CARA. We will use qualitative methodologies that draw on interpretivist and phenomenological perspectives, as well as quantitative methodologies using interrupted time series models, Poisson regression models, Geo mapping and a cost benefits analysis.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Where currently the CARA model is being introduced as a national option for standard risk first-time offending, we will engage with policymakers and academics nationally in the live debate on its effectiveness and suitability during its roll-out. Ethical approval was approved by the University of Southampton on the 1 <sup>st</sup> June 2022 (Ref: ERGO ID: 71818.A1).</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"4 ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A national evaluation of Project Cautioning And Relationship Abuse ('CARA') awareness raising workshops for first time offenders of domestic violence and abuse: protocol for a concurrent mixed-methods evaluation design.\",\"authors\":\"Sara A Morgan, Steph Scott, Joht Chandan, Rachel Armitage, David Culliford, Kate Jolly, Ruth McGovern, William McGovern, Jessica Roy, Rasiah Thayakaran, Tracey A Young, Julie Parkes\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/nihropenres.13609.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interventions related to the perpetration of Domestic Violence and Abuse (DVA) have gained traction over the past several years, in response to dissatisfaction by victims, an inadequate response from the criminal justice system, increased demand on police time and a lack of rehabilitative responses to the perpetration of domestic abuse. The CARA model is a conditional diversionary caution, offered by police for first time offenders of 'standard' or 'medium risk' domestic abuse, that engages perpetrators in awareness raising workshops and signposts them onto further services. Although quasi-experimental studies have indicated that CARA showed promise at reducing reoffending, the CARA model has yet to be evaluated nationally and there is no qualitative evidence related to understanding or learning about the lived experience of perpetrators and victims as they engage with the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a concurrent pragmatic mixed methods design model we will undertake a national evaluation of CARA by triangulating quantitative data from up to nine police forces, and routine data from service providers, with qualitative data from workshop participants, victims and professional stakeholders to: (1) understand the long-term impact of CARA implementation on DVA reoffending and engagement with services and (2) explore perceptions and experiences of both delivery and receipt of CARA. We will use qualitative methodologies that draw on interpretivist and phenomenological perspectives, as well as quantitative methodologies using interrupted time series models, Poisson regression models, Geo mapping and a cost benefits analysis.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Where currently the CARA model is being introduced as a national option for standard risk first-time offending, we will engage with policymakers and academics nationally in the live debate on its effectiveness and suitability during its roll-out. Ethical approval was approved by the University of Southampton on the 1 <sup>st</sup> June 2022 (Ref: ERGO ID: 71818.A1).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIHR open research\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474160/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIHR open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13609.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13609.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:在过去的几年里,由于受害者的不满、刑事司法系统的应对措施不力、对警察时间的需求增加以及缺乏针对家庭暴力行为的改造措施,与家庭暴力和虐待行为(DVA)相关的干预措施越来越受到重视。CARA 模式是警方为 "标准 "或 "中等风险 "家庭虐待初犯提供的一种有条件的分流警告,让施暴者参加提高认识讲习班,并为他们提供进一步服务的路标。虽然准实验研究表明 CARA 有望减少重新犯罪,但 CARA 模式尚未在全国范围内进行评估,也没有定性证据表明施暴者和受害者在参与干预时了解或学习了他们的生活经历:我们将采用一种并行的务实混合方法设计模式,对 CARA 进行全国性评估,将来自多达九个警队的定量数据、来自服务提供者的常规数据以及来自研讨会参与者、受害者和专业利益相关者的定性数据进行三角对比,以便:(1)了解 CARA 的实施对家庭暴力再犯罪和参与服务的长期影响;(2)探索对 CARA 的实施和接受的看法和体验。我们将采用解释学和现象学视角的定性方法,以及使用间断时间序列模型、泊松回归模型、Geo 地图和成本效益分析的定量方法:目前,CARA 模式正在全国范围内作为标准风险首次犯罪的一种选择方案进行推广,我们将与全国的政策制定者和学者一起,在推广过程中就其有效性和适用性进行现场辩论。南安普顿大学于 2022 年 6 月 1 日批准了伦理审批(编号:ERGO ID:71818.A1)。
A national evaluation of Project Cautioning And Relationship Abuse ('CARA') awareness raising workshops for first time offenders of domestic violence and abuse: protocol for a concurrent mixed-methods evaluation design.
Introduction: Interventions related to the perpetration of Domestic Violence and Abuse (DVA) have gained traction over the past several years, in response to dissatisfaction by victims, an inadequate response from the criminal justice system, increased demand on police time and a lack of rehabilitative responses to the perpetration of domestic abuse. The CARA model is a conditional diversionary caution, offered by police for first time offenders of 'standard' or 'medium risk' domestic abuse, that engages perpetrators in awareness raising workshops and signposts them onto further services. Although quasi-experimental studies have indicated that CARA showed promise at reducing reoffending, the CARA model has yet to be evaluated nationally and there is no qualitative evidence related to understanding or learning about the lived experience of perpetrators and victims as they engage with the intervention.
Methods: Using a concurrent pragmatic mixed methods design model we will undertake a national evaluation of CARA by triangulating quantitative data from up to nine police forces, and routine data from service providers, with qualitative data from workshop participants, victims and professional stakeholders to: (1) understand the long-term impact of CARA implementation on DVA reoffending and engagement with services and (2) explore perceptions and experiences of both delivery and receipt of CARA. We will use qualitative methodologies that draw on interpretivist and phenomenological perspectives, as well as quantitative methodologies using interrupted time series models, Poisson regression models, Geo mapping and a cost benefits analysis.
Ethics and dissemination: Where currently the CARA model is being introduced as a national option for standard risk first-time offending, we will engage with policymakers and academics nationally in the live debate on its effectiveness and suitability during its roll-out. Ethical approval was approved by the University of Southampton on the 1 st June 2022 (Ref: ERGO ID: 71818.A1).