联合使用甲氨蝶呤和米非司酮对剖宫产瘢痕妊娠进行保守治疗:系统综述。

Guglielmo Stabile, Laura Vona, Stefania Carlucci, Francesco Zullo, Antonio Simone Laganà, Andrea Etrusco, Stefano Restaino, Luigi Nappi
{"title":"联合使用甲氨蝶呤和米非司酮对剖宫产瘢痕妊娠进行保守治疗:系统综述。","authors":"Guglielmo Stabile, Laura Vona, Stefania Carlucci, Francesco Zullo, Antonio Simone Laganà, Andrea Etrusco, Stefano Restaino, Luigi Nappi","doi":"10.1177/17455057241290424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) has become more frequent as a direct consequence of the increased number of cesarean deliveries and the advances in imaging. Although some cases are characterized by spontaneous resolution, unrecognized or mishandled CSP has the potential to cause both fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. However, due to its infrequency, there is no agreement on the best management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, the risks and effectiveness of medical therapy with methotrexate and mifepristone to better understand its role in CSP therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>The electronic databases PubMed, Medline, and Scopus were comprehensively searched until December 2023. Medical Subject Headings terms (Cesarean scar pregnancy) AND (Methotrexate) AND (Mifepristone) AND (Medical Therapy) were used to identify the relevant records. Due to the rarity of this pathology, the studies included are all case reports or case series. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for case reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included in our review a total of seven cases reported in five manuscripts at the end of the screening process. Our review suggests that this type of combination treatment can be considered. The success rate is 71.4%. Treatment seems to be most effective when beta human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) is below 5,000 mUi/ml and when the gestational sac is less than 20 mm. The absence of fetal heartbeat seems to be a positive prognostic factor for a positive outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methotrexate and mifepristone administration can be considered as an alternative first-line effective treatment, especially in case of pregnancy with B-hCG <5,000 mUi/ml and when the gestational sac is less than 20 mm. It is important to individualize the management and treatment according to the clinical condition, the patient's age, number of previous cesarean deliveries, willingness to have other children, and the physicians' experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"20 ","pages":"17455057241290424"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with the combination of methotrexate and mifepristone: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Guglielmo Stabile, Laura Vona, Stefania Carlucci, Francesco Zullo, Antonio Simone Laganà, Andrea Etrusco, Stefano Restaino, Luigi Nappi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17455057241290424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) has become more frequent as a direct consequence of the increased number of cesarean deliveries and the advances in imaging. Although some cases are characterized by spontaneous resolution, unrecognized or mishandled CSP has the potential to cause both fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. However, due to its infrequency, there is no agreement on the best management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, the risks and effectiveness of medical therapy with methotrexate and mifepristone to better understand its role in CSP therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>The electronic databases PubMed, Medline, and Scopus were comprehensively searched until December 2023. Medical Subject Headings terms (Cesarean scar pregnancy) AND (Methotrexate) AND (Mifepristone) AND (Medical Therapy) were used to identify the relevant records. Due to the rarity of this pathology, the studies included are all case reports or case series. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for case reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included in our review a total of seven cases reported in five manuscripts at the end of the screening process. Our review suggests that this type of combination treatment can be considered. The success rate is 71.4%. Treatment seems to be most effective when beta human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) is below 5,000 mUi/ml and when the gestational sac is less than 20 mm. The absence of fetal heartbeat seems to be a positive prognostic factor for a positive outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methotrexate and mifepristone administration can be considered as an alternative first-line effective treatment, especially in case of pregnancy with B-hCG <5,000 mUi/ml and when the gestational sac is less than 20 mm. It is important to individualize the management and treatment according to the clinical condition, the patient's age, number of previous cesarean deliveries, willingness to have other children, and the physicians' experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"17455057241290424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481064/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241290424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241290424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)越来越常见,这是剖宫产数量增加和影像学进步的直接结果。虽然有些病例可自然痊愈,但未被发现或处理不当的 CSP 有可能导致胎儿和产妇发病和死亡。然而,由于 CSP 并不常见,目前对其最佳处理方法尚无一致意见:本研究旨在评估使用甲氨蝶呤和米非司酮进行药物治疗的安全性、风险和有效性,以更好地了解其在 CSP 治疗中的作用:本研究是一项系统性综述:对PubMed、Medline和Scopus等电子数据库进行了全面检索,直至2023年12月。使用医学主题词(剖宫产瘢痕妊娠)和(甲氨蝶呤)和(米非司酮)和(医学治疗)来确定相关记录。由于这种病症非常罕见,因此纳入的研究均为病例报告或系列病例。纳入研究的方法学质量采用 JBI 病例报告批判性评估核对表进行评估:在筛选过程结束时,我们共纳入了五篇手稿中报告的七个病例。我们的综述表明,可以考虑采用这种联合治疗方法。成功率为 71.4%。当β 绒毛膜促性腺激素(B-hCG)低于 5 000 mUi/ml、孕囊小于 20 mm 时,治疗似乎最为有效。没有胎心似乎是预后良好的一个积极因素:结论:使用甲氨蝶呤和米非司酮可被视为替代性的一线有效治疗方法,尤其是在妊娠合并 B-hCG 阳性时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with the combination of methotrexate and mifepristone: A systematic review.

Background: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) has become more frequent as a direct consequence of the increased number of cesarean deliveries and the advances in imaging. Although some cases are characterized by spontaneous resolution, unrecognized or mishandled CSP has the potential to cause both fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. However, due to its infrequency, there is no agreement on the best management.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, the risks and effectiveness of medical therapy with methotrexate and mifepristone to better understand its role in CSP therapy.

Design: This study is a systematic review.

Data sources and methods: The electronic databases PubMed, Medline, and Scopus were comprehensively searched until December 2023. Medical Subject Headings terms (Cesarean scar pregnancy) AND (Methotrexate) AND (Mifepristone) AND (Medical Therapy) were used to identify the relevant records. Due to the rarity of this pathology, the studies included are all case reports or case series. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for case reports.

Results: We included in our review a total of seven cases reported in five manuscripts at the end of the screening process. Our review suggests that this type of combination treatment can be considered. The success rate is 71.4%. Treatment seems to be most effective when beta human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) is below 5,000 mUi/ml and when the gestational sac is less than 20 mm. The absence of fetal heartbeat seems to be a positive prognostic factor for a positive outcome.

Conclusion: Methotrexate and mifepristone administration can be considered as an alternative first-line effective treatment, especially in case of pregnancy with B-hCG <5,000 mUi/ml and when the gestational sac is less than 20 mm. It is important to individualize the management and treatment according to the clinical condition, the patient's age, number of previous cesarean deliveries, willingness to have other children, and the physicians' experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical violence and its associations: Insights from nationally representative data in India. Unlocking breast cancer in Brazilian public health system: Using tissue microarray for accurate immunohistochemical evaluation with limitations in subtyping. Adapting and validating the satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and duration-breast cancer (SATED-BC) scale for measuring sleep health in Spanish women treated for breast cancer. "Listening to understand," exploring postpartum women's perceptions of their social networks and social support in relation to their health behaviors and weight: A qualitative exploratory study. Evaluation of mental disorder related to colposcopy procedure during the COVID period: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1