在原发性开角型青光眼中比较 STREAMLINE 光道成形术和小梁微型旁路支架植入术的随机对照试验。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S481945
Damien F Goldberg, Claudio Orlich, Brian E Flowers, Inder P Singh, Sydney Tyson, Leonard K Seibold, Mohammed K ElMallah, Elysia M Ison, Med Harbin, Heather Reynolds, Malik Y Kahook
{"title":"在原发性开角型青光眼中比较 STREAMLINE 光道成形术和小梁微型旁路支架植入术的随机对照试验。","authors":"Damien F Goldberg, Claudio Orlich, Brian E Flowers, Inder P Singh, Sydney Tyson, Leonard K Seibold, Mohammed K ElMallah, Elysia M Ison, Med Harbin, Heather Reynolds, Malik Y Kahook","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S481945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report interim results of the VENICE study, a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) comparing STREAMLINE Surgical System (STREAMLINE) canaloplasty with iStent inject W (iStent W) implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) undergoing phacoemulsification.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Safety and efficacy analyses involving the first 72 randomized eyes are included in this report. Following pre- (Screening) and post-medication washout (Eligibility) visits, one eye per subject was randomized 1:1 to STREAMLINE or iStent W after undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Subjects were evaluated postoperatively at Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, 3, and 6. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, number of IOP-lowering medications, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two eyes were randomized; 35 underwent STREAMLINE canaloplasty and 37 were implanted with the iStent W. Seventy eyes completed their 6-month follow-up. Both the mean morning post-washout Baseline IOP between STREAMLINE 24.86±3.05 mmHg and iStent W 25.16±3.41 mmHg and the mean IOP at 6 months between STREAMLINE eyes 16.52±3.63 mmHg and iStent W eyes 16.08±3.19 mmHg were not statistically significantly different (p=0.691 and 0.596, respectively). At 6 months, more eyes were on zero glaucoma medications in the STREAMLINE group (81.8%) compared to the iStent W group (78.4%). In medication-free eyes, the mean IOP was reduced from 24.80±2.79 mmHg to 16.00±3.40 mmHg and 24.60±3.18 mmHg to 15.80±2.21 mmHg in the STREAMLINE and iStent W groups, respectively (p=0.752). Both groups showed reduction in IOP-lowering medications at every visit, compared to pre-washout (Screening), with STREAMLINE resulting in numerically fewer medications 0.20±0.48 compared to iStent W 0.40±0.79 at 6 months (P=0.384). AEs were mild and self-limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, the VENICE trial is the first RCT involving canaloplasty. These interim findings demonstrated comparable IOP and medication reduction between STREAMLINE canaloplasty and iStent W implantation, when combined with phacoemulsification.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing STREAMLINE Canaloplasty to Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent Implantation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.\",\"authors\":\"Damien F Goldberg, Claudio Orlich, Brian E Flowers, Inder P Singh, Sydney Tyson, Leonard K Seibold, Mohammed K ElMallah, Elysia M Ison, Med Harbin, Heather Reynolds, Malik Y Kahook\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S481945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report interim results of the VENICE study, a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) comparing STREAMLINE Surgical System (STREAMLINE) canaloplasty with iStent inject W (iStent W) implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) undergoing phacoemulsification.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Safety and efficacy analyses involving the first 72 randomized eyes are included in this report. Following pre- (Screening) and post-medication washout (Eligibility) visits, one eye per subject was randomized 1:1 to STREAMLINE or iStent W after undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Subjects were evaluated postoperatively at Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, 3, and 6. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, number of IOP-lowering medications, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two eyes were randomized; 35 underwent STREAMLINE canaloplasty and 37 were implanted with the iStent W. Seventy eyes completed their 6-month follow-up. Both the mean morning post-washout Baseline IOP between STREAMLINE 24.86±3.05 mmHg and iStent W 25.16±3.41 mmHg and the mean IOP at 6 months between STREAMLINE eyes 16.52±3.63 mmHg and iStent W eyes 16.08±3.19 mmHg were not statistically significantly different (p=0.691 and 0.596, respectively). At 6 months, more eyes were on zero glaucoma medications in the STREAMLINE group (81.8%) compared to the iStent W group (78.4%). In medication-free eyes, the mean IOP was reduced from 24.80±2.79 mmHg to 16.00±3.40 mmHg and 24.60±3.18 mmHg to 15.80±2.21 mmHg in the STREAMLINE and iStent W groups, respectively (p=0.752). Both groups showed reduction in IOP-lowering medications at every visit, compared to pre-washout (Screening), with STREAMLINE resulting in numerically fewer medications 0.20±0.48 compared to iStent W 0.40±0.79 at 6 months (P=0.384). AEs were mild and self-limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, the VENICE trial is the first RCT involving canaloplasty. These interim findings demonstrated comparable IOP and medication reduction between STREAMLINE canaloplasty and iStent W implantation, when combined with phacoemulsification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491083/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S481945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S481945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:报告 VENICE 研究的中期结果,该研究是一项多中心随机对照试验 (RCT),在接受超声乳化术的轻度至中度原发性开角型青光眼 (POAG) 患者中比较了 STREAMLINE 手术系统 (STREAMLINE) 导管成形术和 iStent inject W (iStent W) 植入术:本报告包括对首批 72 只随机眼进行的安全性和有效性分析。在进行术前(筛查)和术后药物冲洗(资格)检查后,每名受试者的一只眼在接受无并发症的超声乳化术后按 1:1 随机分配到 STREAMLINE 或 iStent W。受试者在术后第 1 天、第 1 周、第 1 个月、第 3 个月和第 6 个月接受评估。在每次随访时对眼压(IOP)测量值、降眼压药物的使用次数以及不良事件(AEs)进行评估:72只眼睛被随机选中,其中35只接受了STREAMLINE晶体管成形术,37只植入了iStent W。STREAMLINE 24.86±3.05 mmHg 和 iStent W 25.16±3.41 mmHg 之间的早晨冲洗后平均基线眼压以及 STREAMLINE 16.52±3.63 mmHg 和 iStent W 16.08±3.19 mmHg 之间的 6 个月平均眼压在统计学上没有显著差异(分别为 p=0.691 和 0.596)。6 个月时,STREAMLINE 组(81.8%)与 iStent W 组(78.4%)相比,有更多的眼睛没有使用青光眼药物。在无药物治疗的眼睛中,STREAMLINE 组和 iStent W 组的平均眼压分别从 24.80±2.79 mmHg 降至 16.00±3.40 mmHg 和 24.60±3.18 mmHg 降至 15.80±2.21 mmHg(P=0.752)。与冲洗前(筛查)相比,两组患者每次就诊时的降眼压药物用量都有所减少,6个月时,STREAMLINE组的药物用量为0.20±0.48,而iStent W组为0.40±0.79(P=0.384)。AEs轻微且有自限性:据我们所知,VENICE 试验是首个涉及管成形术的 RCT。这些中期研究结果表明,在结合超声乳化术的情况下,STREAMLINE 管成形术和 iStent W 植入术在降低眼压和减少用药量方面具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing STREAMLINE Canaloplasty to Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent Implantation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Purpose: To report interim results of the VENICE study, a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) comparing STREAMLINE Surgical System (STREAMLINE) canaloplasty with iStent inject W (iStent W) implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) undergoing phacoemulsification.

Patients and methods: Safety and efficacy analyses involving the first 72 randomized eyes are included in this report. Following pre- (Screening) and post-medication washout (Eligibility) visits, one eye per subject was randomized 1:1 to STREAMLINE or iStent W after undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Subjects were evaluated postoperatively at Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, 3, and 6. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, number of IOP-lowering medications, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up visit.

Results: Seventy-two eyes were randomized; 35 underwent STREAMLINE canaloplasty and 37 were implanted with the iStent W. Seventy eyes completed their 6-month follow-up. Both the mean morning post-washout Baseline IOP between STREAMLINE 24.86±3.05 mmHg and iStent W 25.16±3.41 mmHg and the mean IOP at 6 months between STREAMLINE eyes 16.52±3.63 mmHg and iStent W eyes 16.08±3.19 mmHg were not statistically significantly different (p=0.691 and 0.596, respectively). At 6 months, more eyes were on zero glaucoma medications in the STREAMLINE group (81.8%) compared to the iStent W group (78.4%). In medication-free eyes, the mean IOP was reduced from 24.80±2.79 mmHg to 16.00±3.40 mmHg and 24.60±3.18 mmHg to 15.80±2.21 mmHg in the STREAMLINE and iStent W groups, respectively (p=0.752). Both groups showed reduction in IOP-lowering medications at every visit, compared to pre-washout (Screening), with STREAMLINE resulting in numerically fewer medications 0.20±0.48 compared to iStent W 0.40±0.79 at 6 months (P=0.384). AEs were mild and self-limited.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, the VENICE trial is the first RCT involving canaloplasty. These interim findings demonstrated comparable IOP and medication reduction between STREAMLINE canaloplasty and iStent W implantation, when combined with phacoemulsification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Particulate Matter Pollutants and Ophthalmology Visits for Ocular Surface Irritation and Allergy. The Cutting Efficiency of a Hybrid Phacoemulsification Tip Using High and Low Intraocular Pressure Settings in Different Grades of Cataract. Comparison of Large Language Models in Diagnosis and Management of Challenging Clinical Cases. Enhancing OCT Reliability: The Role of Eye-Tracking in Achieving Consistent Retinal Measurements [Letter]. Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Seen Through the Free Diabetes Screening (FDS) Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1