Procalcitonin-Guided Management and Duration of Antibiotic Therapy in Critically Illous Cancer Patients with Sepsis (Pro-Can Study):随机对照试验

Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2024-10-21 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001173
Lama H Nazer, Wedad Awad, Hadeel Thawabieh, Aseel Abusara, Deema Abdelrahman, Awad Addassi, Osama Abuatta, Maher Sughayer, Yahya Shehabi
{"title":"Procalcitonin-Guided Management and Duration of Antibiotic Therapy in Critically Illous Cancer Patients with Sepsis (Pro-Can Study):随机对照试验","authors":"Lama H Nazer, Wedad Awad, Hadeel Thawabieh, Aseel Abusara, Deema Abdelrahman, Awad Addassi, Osama Abuatta, Maher Sughayer, Yahya Shehabi","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of procalcitonin-guided management on the duration of antibiotic therapy in critically ill cancer patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A comprehensive multidisciplinary cancer hospital in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with cancer treated in the ICU who were started on antibiotics for suspected infection, met the SEPSIS-3 criteria, and were expected to stay in the ICU greater than or equal to 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to the procalcitonin-guided or standard care (SC) arms. All patients had procalcitonin measured daily, up to 5 days or until ICU discharge or death. For the procalcitonin arm, a procalcitonin-guided algorithm was provided to guide antibiotic management, but clinicians were allowed to override the algorithm, if clinically indicated. In the SC arm, ICU clinicians were blinded to the procalcitonin levels.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Primary outcome was time to antibiotic cessation. We also evaluated the number of antibiotic-free days at 28 days, hospital discharge, or death, whichever came first, and antibiotic defined daily doses (DDDs). We enrolled 77 patients in the procalcitonin arm and 76 in the SC arm. Mean age was 58 ± 14 (sd) years, 67% were males, 74% had solid tumors, and 13% were neutropenic. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were 7 (6-10) and 7 (5-9) and procalcitonin concentrations (ng/mL) at baseline were 3.4 (0.8-16) and 3.4 (0.5-26), in the procalcitonin and SC arms, respectively. There was no difference in the median (IQR) time to antibiotic cessation in the procalcitonin and SC arms, 8 (4-11) and 8 (5-13), respectively (p = 0.463). Median (IQR) number of antibiotic-free days were 20 (17-24) and 20 (16-23), (p = 0.484) and total DDDs were 1541.4 and 2050.4 in the procalcitonin and SC arms, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In critically ill cancer patients with sepsis, procalcitonin-guided management did not reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"6 10","pages":"e1173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procalcitonin-Guided Management and Duration of Antibiotic Therapy in Critically Ill Cancer Patients With Sepsis (Pro-Can Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lama H Nazer, Wedad Awad, Hadeel Thawabieh, Aseel Abusara, Deema Abdelrahman, Awad Addassi, Osama Abuatta, Maher Sughayer, Yahya Shehabi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of procalcitonin-guided management on the duration of antibiotic therapy in critically ill cancer patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A comprehensive multidisciplinary cancer hospital in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with cancer treated in the ICU who were started on antibiotics for suspected infection, met the SEPSIS-3 criteria, and were expected to stay in the ICU greater than or equal to 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to the procalcitonin-guided or standard care (SC) arms. All patients had procalcitonin measured daily, up to 5 days or until ICU discharge or death. For the procalcitonin arm, a procalcitonin-guided algorithm was provided to guide antibiotic management, but clinicians were allowed to override the algorithm, if clinically indicated. In the SC arm, ICU clinicians were blinded to the procalcitonin levels.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Primary outcome was time to antibiotic cessation. We also evaluated the number of antibiotic-free days at 28 days, hospital discharge, or death, whichever came first, and antibiotic defined daily doses (DDDs). We enrolled 77 patients in the procalcitonin arm and 76 in the SC arm. Mean age was 58 ± 14 (sd) years, 67% were males, 74% had solid tumors, and 13% were neutropenic. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were 7 (6-10) and 7 (5-9) and procalcitonin concentrations (ng/mL) at baseline were 3.4 (0.8-16) and 3.4 (0.5-26), in the procalcitonin and SC arms, respectively. There was no difference in the median (IQR) time to antibiotic cessation in the procalcitonin and SC arms, 8 (4-11) and 8 (5-13), respectively (p = 0.463). Median (IQR) number of antibiotic-free days were 20 (17-24) and 20 (16-23), (p = 0.484) and total DDDs were 1541.4 and 2050.4 in the procalcitonin and SC arms, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In critically ill cancer patients with sepsis, procalcitonin-guided management did not reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"6 10\",\"pages\":\"e1173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估降钙素原指导疗法对脓毒症重症癌症患者抗生素治疗时间的影响:随机对照单盲试验:约旦一家综合性多学科癌症医院:患者:在重症监护室接受治疗的成人癌症患者,因疑似感染而开始使用抗生素,符合 SEPSIS-3 标准,预计在重症监护室的住院时间超过或等于 48 小时:患者被随机分配到降钙素原指导组或标准护理组(SC)。所有患者每天都要测量降钙素原,最长测量时间为 5 天或直到 ICU 出院或死亡。在丙种球蛋白治疗组中,提供了一种丙种球蛋白指导算法来指导抗生素治疗,但临床医生可根据临床需要更改算法。在SC组中,ICU临床医生对降钙素原水平保持盲法:主要结果是停止使用抗生素的时间。我们还评估了28天、出院或死亡(以先到者为准)时的无抗生素天数以及抗生素定义日剂量(DDDs)。我们在降钙素治疗组招募了 77 名患者,在 SC 治疗组招募了 76 名患者。平均年龄为 58 ± 14(sd)岁,67% 为男性,74% 患有实体瘤,13% 患有中性粒细胞减少症。序贯器官衰竭评估评分的中位数(四分位间距 [IQR] )分别为 7(6-10)和 7(5-9),基线时的降钙素原浓度(纳克/毫升)分别为 3.4(0.8-16)和 3.4(0.5-26)。在停用抗生素的中位(IQR)时间上,丙种球蛋白组和SC组没有差异,分别为8(4-11)和8(5-13)(p = 0.463)。无抗生素治疗天数的中位数(IQR)分别为20(17-24)天和20(16-23)天(p = 0.484),而降钙素治疗组和SC治疗组的总DDD分别为1541.4和2050.4:对于患有败血症的重症癌症患者,降钙素原指导下的治疗并不会缩短抗生素治疗时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Procalcitonin-Guided Management and Duration of Antibiotic Therapy in Critically Ill Cancer Patients With Sepsis (Pro-Can Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of procalcitonin-guided management on the duration of antibiotic therapy in critically ill cancer patients with sepsis.

Design: Randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial.

Setting: A comprehensive multidisciplinary cancer hospital in Jordan.

Patients: Adults with cancer treated in the ICU who were started on antibiotics for suspected infection, met the SEPSIS-3 criteria, and were expected to stay in the ICU greater than or equal to 48 hours.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to the procalcitonin-guided or standard care (SC) arms. All patients had procalcitonin measured daily, up to 5 days or until ICU discharge or death. For the procalcitonin arm, a procalcitonin-guided algorithm was provided to guide antibiotic management, but clinicians were allowed to override the algorithm, if clinically indicated. In the SC arm, ICU clinicians were blinded to the procalcitonin levels.

Measurements and main results: Primary outcome was time to antibiotic cessation. We also evaluated the number of antibiotic-free days at 28 days, hospital discharge, or death, whichever came first, and antibiotic defined daily doses (DDDs). We enrolled 77 patients in the procalcitonin arm and 76 in the SC arm. Mean age was 58 ± 14 (sd) years, 67% were males, 74% had solid tumors, and 13% were neutropenic. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were 7 (6-10) and 7 (5-9) and procalcitonin concentrations (ng/mL) at baseline were 3.4 (0.8-16) and 3.4 (0.5-26), in the procalcitonin and SC arms, respectively. There was no difference in the median (IQR) time to antibiotic cessation in the procalcitonin and SC arms, 8 (4-11) and 8 (5-13), respectively (p = 0.463). Median (IQR) number of antibiotic-free days were 20 (17-24) and 20 (16-23), (p = 0.484) and total DDDs were 1541.4 and 2050.4 in the procalcitonin and SC arms, respectively.

Conclusions: In critically ill cancer patients with sepsis, procalcitonin-guided management did not reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Awake" Cannulation of Patients for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygen: An Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Current Emergency Medical Service Vasoactive Use for the Management of Shock. Critical Data for Critical Care: A Primer on Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data for Research From Society of Critical Care Medicine's Panel on Data Sharing and Harmonization. Clinical Subtype Trajectories in Sepsis Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Secondary Analysis of an Observational Study. Septic Shock Requiring Three Vasopressors: Patient Demographics and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1