Musculoskeletal imaging fellowship program directors: A study of educational paths, and scholarly engagement in the United States.

Purpose: The overall aim of the study is to analyze and provide a comprehensive understanding of the demographics, educational backgrounds, and scholarly activities of musculoskeletal imaging fellowship program directors across the United States.

Methods: A list of all members of the Society of Skeletal Radiology was obtained and musculoskeletal imaging fellowship program directors across the US were included. Publicly available online sources were used to gather demographic and educational information about each musculoskeletal imaging fellowship program director, which included the online curriculum vitae from the program websites, Health Grades, Doximity, and Elsevier's Scopus database. Demographic and educational data including age, gender, educational background (medical school, residency, fellowship), additional degrees, academic rank, prior leadership positions, and metrics of scholarly activity were recorded. Fellowships in diagnostic musculoskeletal radiology along with additional degrees were recorded. A two-tailed unpaired t-test was used to calculate the difference between means of scholarly activity between male and female PDs.

Results: In this study encompassing 92 programs across the United States, the majority (88) were dedicated to pure Musculoskeletal (MSK) Imaging Fellowship, while one each offered combined training in MSK and Body Imaging, MSK, and Emergency Imaging, MSK Sports, and Interventional Spine, and Pediatric MSK Imaging. Program directors were identified for 90 out of 92 programs, revealing a regional distribution of 29 in the South (31.5 %), 24 in the North East (26.1 %), 20 in the Midwest (21.74 %) and 19 in the West (20.65 %). Gender analysis unveiled a predominantly male representation, with 71 male directors compared to 17 female directors, while age ranged from 30 to 70 years, with a mean age of 47.17 ± 7.4 years. Medical school backgrounds predominantly featured MD degrees (80), followed by IMG (7) and DO (4) degrees, with the most common IMG source being India. Faculty positions were mainly distributed among Assistant Professors (35), Associate Professors (32), and Professors (11). Research output metrics showcased a mean of 41.943 publications and an h-index of 10.625. Extra degrees were obtained by 31 directors, with common additions being other fellowships, MBAs, MS degrees, and PhDs. Notably, some directors held previous or current leadership positions, while a few had completed residencies outside of Radiology or pursued fellowships beyond MSK Imaging.

Conclusion: Musculoskeletal imaging fellowship program directors across the United States are predominantly male, with approximately 8 % having graduated from international medical schools. The most common training pathway for these directors is completing a diagnostic radiology residency followed by a musculoskeletal radiology fellowship. This study highlighted the gender disparity within this leadership group and emphasized the diverse educational backgrounds that contribute to the field of musculoskeletal imaging.