明尼苏达州南部和美国农村地区社区姑息关怀服务的最新回顾。

Ellen Vorbeck, Kristen Abbott-Anderson, Alicia Reed, Meritxell Mondejar-Pont
{"title":"明尼苏达州南部和美国农村地区社区姑息关怀服务的最新回顾。","authors":"Ellen Vorbeck, Kristen Abbott-Anderson, Alicia Reed, Meritxell Mondejar-Pont","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.10.524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This state-of-the-art (SOTA) review aimed to understand the historical, current and future of rural community palliative care services (PCS) with a primary focus in rural southern Minnesota communities and the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the six step SOTA systematic review process described by Barry et al (2022) and examined articles from 2010-2023 regarding rural PCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Historical and current research consistently supported the benefits of PCS and reported the top facilitators as a clear definition of palliative care and PCS. The top barriers included a lack service provision, funding/resources, national policies/regulation, and shortages of trained providers in rural communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers to the provision of PCS have not improved based on this review in rural areas and must be addressed to reduce healthcare disparities for rural populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"30 10","pages":"524-535"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A state-of-the-art review of community-based palliative care services in rural areas of Southern Minnesota and the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Vorbeck, Kristen Abbott-Anderson, Alicia Reed, Meritxell Mondejar-Pont\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.10.524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This state-of-the-art (SOTA) review aimed to understand the historical, current and future of rural community palliative care services (PCS) with a primary focus in rural southern Minnesota communities and the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the six step SOTA systematic review process described by Barry et al (2022) and examined articles from 2010-2023 regarding rural PCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Historical and current research consistently supported the benefits of PCS and reported the top facilitators as a clear definition of palliative care and PCS. The top barriers included a lack service provision, funding/resources, national policies/regulation, and shortages of trained providers in rural communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers to the provision of PCS have not improved based on this review in rural areas and must be addressed to reduce healthcare disparities for rural populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of palliative nursing\",\"volume\":\"30 10\",\"pages\":\"524-535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of palliative nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.10.524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.10.524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这篇最新(SOTA)综述旨在了解农村社区姑息关怀服务(PCS)的历史、现状和未来,主要关注明尼苏达州南部农村社区和美国:本综述遵循巴里等人(2022 年)描述的六步 SOTA 系统综述流程,研究了 2010-2023 年间有关农村姑息关怀服务的文章:结果:历史研究和当前研究一致支持姑息关怀和姑息关怀服务的益处,并将姑息关怀和姑息关怀服务的明确定义列为最大的促进因素。最大的障碍包括缺乏服务提供、资金/资源、国家政策/法规以及农村社区缺乏训练有素的医疗服务提供者:结论:根据本次研究,在农村地区提供姑息关怀服务的障碍并没有得到改善,因此必须加以解决,以减少农村人口在医疗保健方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A state-of-the-art review of community-based palliative care services in rural areas of Southern Minnesota and the United States.

Background: This state-of-the-art (SOTA) review aimed to understand the historical, current and future of rural community palliative care services (PCS) with a primary focus in rural southern Minnesota communities and the United States.

Methods: This review followed the six step SOTA systematic review process described by Barry et al (2022) and examined articles from 2010-2023 regarding rural PCS.

Results: Historical and current research consistently supported the benefits of PCS and reported the top facilitators as a clear definition of palliative care and PCS. The top barriers included a lack service provision, funding/resources, national policies/regulation, and shortages of trained providers in rural communities.

Conclusions: Barriers to the provision of PCS have not improved based on this review in rural areas and must be addressed to reduce healthcare disparities for rural populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A state-of-the-art review of community-based palliative care services in rural areas of Southern Minnesota and the United States. Exploring the patients' and family members' perspectives on home-based palliative care. Hospice educators' perspectives on e-learning in palliative care education in Ireland. Paediatric palliative care in low- and middle-income countries. Research Roundup.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1