评估 GeneXpert MTB/Rif Ultra 检测法在福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织结核分枝杆菌检测中的性能。

Calvin Ka-Fung Lo, Dale Purych, Inna Sekirov, Jaswinder Khattra, Trevor J Hird, Shazia Masud
{"title":"评估 GeneXpert MTB/Rif Ultra 检测法在福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织结核分枝杆菌检测中的性能。","authors":"Calvin Ka-Fung Lo, Dale Purych, Inna Sekirov, Jaswinder Khattra, Trevor J Hird, Shazia Masud","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated the Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra assay performance for <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (MTB) detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPET) compared to mycobacterial culture or laboratory-developed MTB PCR test (LDT). FFPET samples with histological features suggestive of tuberculosis from 2018 to 2023 were selected. Five hundred microlitres of tissue lysis buffer was added to FFPET scrolls and incubated at 75 °C for 5 min. After adding 50 µl of proteinase K and overnight incubation at 56 °C, sample aliquots were processed as per the manufacturer's instructions. MTB culture or LDT assay results were used as a reference for sensitivity and specificity calculations. Of 51 eligible FFPET, 32 were positive for MTB either by culture or LDT PCR on FFPET. Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra detected MTB in 23/32 positive specimens [71.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 54.6-84.4%]. Of nine discordant specimens, seven were MTB positive by culture and two were identified by LDT MTB PCR only, as no specimen was submitted for MTB culture. Of 19 negative samples, 100% specificity (95% CI 83.2-100.0%) was attained via Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra. Implementation of Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra on FFPET within clinical laboratories is promising, given its improved turnaround time compared to MTB culture and ability to detect MTB in cases where no tissue is available for culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"73 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of GeneXpert MTB/Rif Ultra assay performance on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues for <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> detection.\",\"authors\":\"Calvin Ka-Fung Lo, Dale Purych, Inna Sekirov, Jaswinder Khattra, Trevor J Hird, Shazia Masud\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jmm.0.001918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We evaluated the Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra assay performance for <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (MTB) detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPET) compared to mycobacterial culture or laboratory-developed MTB PCR test (LDT). FFPET samples with histological features suggestive of tuberculosis from 2018 to 2023 were selected. Five hundred microlitres of tissue lysis buffer was added to FFPET scrolls and incubated at 75 °C for 5 min. After adding 50 µl of proteinase K and overnight incubation at 56 °C, sample aliquots were processed as per the manufacturer's instructions. MTB culture or LDT assay results were used as a reference for sensitivity and specificity calculations. Of 51 eligible FFPET, 32 were positive for MTB either by culture or LDT PCR on FFPET. Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra detected MTB in 23/32 positive specimens [71.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 54.6-84.4%]. Of nine discordant specimens, seven were MTB positive by culture and two were identified by LDT MTB PCR only, as no specimen was submitted for MTB culture. Of 19 negative samples, 100% specificity (95% CI 83.2-100.0%) was attained via Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra. Implementation of Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra on FFPET within clinical laboratories is promising, given its improved turnaround time compared to MTB culture and ability to detect MTB in cases where no tissue is available for culture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"volume\":\"73 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495408/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与分枝杆菌培养或实验室开发的 MTB PCR 检测(LDT)相比,我们评估了 Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra 检测法在福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织(FFPET)中检测结核分枝杆菌(MTB)的性能。研究人员选取了 2018 年至 2023 年具有结核病组织学特征的 FFPET 样本。在FFPET卷轴中加入500微升组织裂解缓冲液,并在75℃下孵育5分钟。加入 50 微升蛋白酶 K 并在 56 ℃ 温育过夜后,按照制造商的说明处理等分样品。MTB 培养或 LDT 检测结果用作灵敏度和特异性计算的参考。在 51 份合格的 FFPET 中,有 32 份经 FFPET 培养或 LDT PCR 检测呈 MTB 阳性。在 23/32 份阳性标本中,Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra 检测出 MTB [71.9%,95% 置信区间 (CI) 54.6-84.4%]。在 9 份不一致的标本中,7 份经培养呈 MTB 阳性,2 份仅经 LDT MTB PCR 鉴定,因为没有提交标本进行 MTB 培养。在 19 份阴性样本中,Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra 的特异性达到 100%(95% CI 83.2-100.0%)。与 MTB 培养相比,Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra 可缩短周转时间,而且在没有组织进行培养的情况下也能检测出 MTB,因此在临床实验室的 FFPET 上使用 Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra 是很有前景的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of GeneXpert MTB/Rif Ultra assay performance on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection.

We evaluated the Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra assay performance for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPET) compared to mycobacterial culture or laboratory-developed MTB PCR test (LDT). FFPET samples with histological features suggestive of tuberculosis from 2018 to 2023 were selected. Five hundred microlitres of tissue lysis buffer was added to FFPET scrolls and incubated at 75 °C for 5 min. After adding 50 µl of proteinase K and overnight incubation at 56 °C, sample aliquots were processed as per the manufacturer's instructions. MTB culture or LDT assay results were used as a reference for sensitivity and specificity calculations. Of 51 eligible FFPET, 32 were positive for MTB either by culture or LDT PCR on FFPET. Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra detected MTB in 23/32 positive specimens [71.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 54.6-84.4%]. Of nine discordant specimens, seven were MTB positive by culture and two were identified by LDT MTB PCR only, as no specimen was submitted for MTB culture. Of 19 negative samples, 100% specificity (95% CI 83.2-100.0%) was attained via Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra. Implementation of Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra on FFPET within clinical laboratories is promising, given its improved turnaround time compared to MTB culture and ability to detect MTB in cases where no tissue is available for culture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antifungal resistance, clinical outcome and clinico-microbiological correlation in ocular infections due to common melanized fungi Curvularia lunata and Lasiodiplodia theobromae in South India. Genotypic analysis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli clonal complex 17 in England and Wales, 2014-2022. Nanomotion technology: an innovative method to study cell metabolism in Escherichia coli, as a potential indicator for tolerance. Association of gut microbiota with allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients: a comparative profiling through 16S metagenomics and quantitative PCR. Chronic Strongyloides stercoralis infection in Fijian migrants to the UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1