晚期慢性肾脏病患者的家庭强化降压治疗。

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American Journal of Kidney Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.08.010
Elaine Ku,Timothy P Copeland,Charles E McCulloch,Divya Seth,Christopher A Carlos,Kerry Cho,Anna Malkina,Lowell J Lo,Raymond K Hsu
{"title":"晚期慢性肾脏病患者的家庭强化降压治疗。","authors":"Elaine Ku,Timothy P Copeland,Charles E McCulloch,Divya Seth,Christopher A Carlos,Kerry Cho,Anna Malkina,Lowell J Lo,Raymond K Hsu","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE\r\nOptimal blood pressure (BP) targets in advanced CKD are controversial. More intensive BP lowering in the setting of advanced CKD is thought to be associated with risk of acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and ESKD. We aimed to conduct a pilot trial of intensive BP control to determine if lower SBP targets can be safely achieved for patients with CKD through titration of BP medications using in-home measured BP.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nNon-blinded randomized controlled trial.\r\n\r\nSETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS\r\n108 patients with advanced CKD (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hypertension.\r\n\r\nINTERVENTIONS\r\nParticipants were randomized either to a target home SBP goal of <120 mmHg (N=66) or a less intensive SBP goal (N=42). Antihypertensive medications were titrated to achieve the target home SBP range in the first 4 months of the study and maintained until the end of the study. Home BP was measured using a wireless Bluetooth-enabled monitor that transmitted readings to providers in real-time.\r\n\r\nOUTCOMES\r\nThe primary efficacy outcome was the difference in achieved clinic SBP between the two study arms from months 4-12. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia, a composite outcome of falls or syncope, and onset of need for dialysis or kidney transplantation.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe mean clinic SBP at month 12 was 124.7 mmHg in the intensive SBP group vs. 138.2 mmHg in the less intensive SBP group. Averaged over months 4-12, the achieved mean clinic SBP in the intensive SBP arm was 11.7 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 16 mmHg, p<0.001) lower than the mean SBP achieved in the less intensive SBP arm. Primary safety outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the two arms (all p>0.05).\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nSmall sample size which may limit our ability to detect clinically significant differences in rates of adverse outcomes; single-center design.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nA clinic SBP goal of <120 mmHg is feasible to achieve with the help of real-time home BP monitoring and appears to be safe in this study population with advanced CKD. Larger trials to determine optimal BP targets in advanced CKD and the risks and benefits associated with more intensive BP control are warranted.","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive Home Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients with Advanced CKD.\",\"authors\":\"Elaine Ku,Timothy P Copeland,Charles E McCulloch,Divya Seth,Christopher A Carlos,Kerry Cho,Anna Malkina,Lowell J Lo,Raymond K Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE\\r\\nOptimal blood pressure (BP) targets in advanced CKD are controversial. More intensive BP lowering in the setting of advanced CKD is thought to be associated with risk of acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and ESKD. We aimed to conduct a pilot trial of intensive BP control to determine if lower SBP targets can be safely achieved for patients with CKD through titration of BP medications using in-home measured BP.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY DESIGN\\r\\nNon-blinded randomized controlled trial.\\r\\n\\r\\nSETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS\\r\\n108 patients with advanced CKD (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hypertension.\\r\\n\\r\\nINTERVENTIONS\\r\\nParticipants were randomized either to a target home SBP goal of <120 mmHg (N=66) or a less intensive SBP goal (N=42). Antihypertensive medications were titrated to achieve the target home SBP range in the first 4 months of the study and maintained until the end of the study. Home BP was measured using a wireless Bluetooth-enabled monitor that transmitted readings to providers in real-time.\\r\\n\\r\\nOUTCOMES\\r\\nThe primary efficacy outcome was the difference in achieved clinic SBP between the two study arms from months 4-12. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia, a composite outcome of falls or syncope, and onset of need for dialysis or kidney transplantation.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe mean clinic SBP at month 12 was 124.7 mmHg in the intensive SBP group vs. 138.2 mmHg in the less intensive SBP group. Averaged over months 4-12, the achieved mean clinic SBP in the intensive SBP arm was 11.7 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 16 mmHg, p<0.001) lower than the mean SBP achieved in the less intensive SBP arm. Primary safety outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the two arms (all p>0.05).\\r\\n\\r\\nLIMITATIONS\\r\\nSmall sample size which may limit our ability to detect clinically significant differences in rates of adverse outcomes; single-center design.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nA clinic SBP goal of <120 mmHg is feasible to achieve with the help of real-time home BP monitoring and appears to be safe in this study population with advanced CKD. Larger trials to determine optimal BP targets in advanced CKD and the risks and benefits associated with more intensive BP control are warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Kidney Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Kidney Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.08.010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.08.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原理与目的 晚期慢性肾脏病的最佳血压(BP)目标尚存在争议。在晚期 CKD 的情况下,更密集地降低血压被认为与急性肾损伤、高钾血症和 ESKD 的风险有关。我们旨在开展一项强化血压控制的试点试验,以确定是否可以通过使用居家测量血压滴定降压药物,安全地为 CKD 患者实现较低的 SBP 目标。局限性样本量较少,这可能会限制我们检测不良后果发生率方面具有临床意义差异的能力;单中心设计。结论在实时家庭血压监测的帮助下,实现<120 mmHg的门诊血压目标是可行的,而且在晚期CKD患者中似乎是安全的。有必要进行更大规模的试验,以确定晚期 CKD 的最佳血压目标以及更强化血压控制的相关风险和益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intensive Home Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients with Advanced CKD.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in advanced CKD are controversial. More intensive BP lowering in the setting of advanced CKD is thought to be associated with risk of acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and ESKD. We aimed to conduct a pilot trial of intensive BP control to determine if lower SBP targets can be safely achieved for patients with CKD through titration of BP medications using in-home measured BP. STUDY DESIGN Non-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS 108 patients with advanced CKD (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hypertension. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized either to a target home SBP goal of <120 mmHg (N=66) or a less intensive SBP goal (N=42). Antihypertensive medications were titrated to achieve the target home SBP range in the first 4 months of the study and maintained until the end of the study. Home BP was measured using a wireless Bluetooth-enabled monitor that transmitted readings to providers in real-time. OUTCOMES The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in achieved clinic SBP between the two study arms from months 4-12. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia, a composite outcome of falls or syncope, and onset of need for dialysis or kidney transplantation. RESULTS The mean clinic SBP at month 12 was 124.7 mmHg in the intensive SBP group vs. 138.2 mmHg in the less intensive SBP group. Averaged over months 4-12, the achieved mean clinic SBP in the intensive SBP arm was 11.7 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 16 mmHg, p<0.001) lower than the mean SBP achieved in the less intensive SBP arm. Primary safety outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the two arms (all p>0.05). LIMITATIONS Small sample size which may limit our ability to detect clinically significant differences in rates of adverse outcomes; single-center design. CONCLUSIONS A clinic SBP goal of <120 mmHg is feasible to achieve with the help of real-time home BP monitoring and appears to be safe in this study population with advanced CKD. Larger trials to determine optimal BP targets in advanced CKD and the risks and benefits associated with more intensive BP control are warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
732
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.
期刊最新文献
Aiming for a Patient-Centered Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Exploring the Causal Relationship Between Kidney Function and Cancer Risk: Insights and Limitations of Mendelian Randomization. Proteinuria as an Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. Sex, Acute Kidney Injury, and Age: A Prospective Cohort Study. Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1