通过可信硬件实现智能合约的保密性:事实与虚构

IF 8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1109/TIFS.2024.3484291
Rujia Li;Qin Wang;Yuanzhao Li;Sisi Duan;Qi Wang;David Galindo
{"title":"通过可信硬件实现智能合约的保密性:事实与虚构","authors":"Rujia Li;Qin Wang;Yuanzhao Li;Sisi Duan;Qi Wang;David Galindo","doi":"10.1109/TIFS.2024.3484291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)-assisted confidential smart contracts (TCSC) have attracted extensive attention from both academia and industry. Despite an enormous number of TCSC projects, the extent of confidentiality offered by them remains being questioned: the factual and fictional aspects are not well distinguished, which limits their adoption. In this paper, we provide a formal treatment of TCSC, endowing them with an expressive syntax and security definitions. Based on these definitions, we propose a provably secure TCSC instantiation. Then, we investigate each algorithm and identify the implementation flaws that may make a TCSC system violate its security properties. Our analysis reveals the gap between theoretical security models and real-world implementations: even assuming a TCSC is provably secure by design, it may still fail in practice. We further compare our TCSC instantiation with 16 representative TCSC systems. Our results show that, surprisingly, all these surveyed projects are subject to practical attacks. Finally, we implement a TCSC prototype and conduct a comprehensive evaluation, revealing the overheads of distributed key management and the performance challenges of executing complex contracts within TEEs.","PeriodicalId":13492,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security","volume":"20 ","pages":"159-174"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing Smart Contract Confidentiality via Trusted Hardware: Fact and Fiction\",\"authors\":\"Rujia Li;Qin Wang;Yuanzhao Li;Sisi Duan;Qi Wang;David Galindo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TIFS.2024.3484291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)-assisted confidential smart contracts (TCSC) have attracted extensive attention from both academia and industry. Despite an enormous number of TCSC projects, the extent of confidentiality offered by them remains being questioned: the factual and fictional aspects are not well distinguished, which limits their adoption. In this paper, we provide a formal treatment of TCSC, endowing them with an expressive syntax and security definitions. Based on these definitions, we propose a provably secure TCSC instantiation. Then, we investigate each algorithm and identify the implementation flaws that may make a TCSC system violate its security properties. Our analysis reveals the gap between theoretical security models and real-world implementations: even assuming a TCSC is provably secure by design, it may still fail in practice. We further compare our TCSC instantiation with 16 representative TCSC systems. Our results show that, surprisingly, all these surveyed projects are subject to practical attacks. Finally, we implement a TCSC prototype and conduct a comprehensive evaluation, revealing the overheads of distributed key management and the performance challenges of executing complex contracts within TEEs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"159-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10723772/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10723772/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可信执行环境(TEE)辅助保密智能合约(TCSC)已引起学术界和业界的广泛关注。尽管有大量的TCSC项目,但它们提供的保密程度仍然受到质疑:事实和虚构的方面没有得到很好的区分,这限制了它们的采用。在本文中,我们提供了对TCSC的形式化处理,赋予它们具有表达性的语法和安全定义。基于这些定义,我们提出了一个可证明安全的TCSC实例。然后,我们研究了每种算法,并找出了可能使TCSC系统违反其安全属性的实现缺陷。我们的分析揭示了理论安全模型和现实世界实现之间的差距:即使假设TCSC在设计上是安全的,它在实践中仍然可能失败。我们进一步将我们的TCSC实例与16个具有代表性的TCSC系统进行了比较。我们的结果显示,令人惊讶的是,所有这些被调查的项目都受到实际攻击。最后,我们实现了一个TCSC原型并进行了全面的评估,揭示了分布式密钥管理的开销以及在tee中执行复杂合同的性能挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bringing Smart Contract Confidentiality via Trusted Hardware: Fact and Fiction
Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)-assisted confidential smart contracts (TCSC) have attracted extensive attention from both academia and industry. Despite an enormous number of TCSC projects, the extent of confidentiality offered by them remains being questioned: the factual and fictional aspects are not well distinguished, which limits their adoption. In this paper, we provide a formal treatment of TCSC, endowing them with an expressive syntax and security definitions. Based on these definitions, we propose a provably secure TCSC instantiation. Then, we investigate each algorithm and identify the implementation flaws that may make a TCSC system violate its security properties. Our analysis reveals the gap between theoretical security models and real-world implementations: even assuming a TCSC is provably secure by design, it may still fail in practice. We further compare our TCSC instantiation with 16 representative TCSC systems. Our results show that, surprisingly, all these surveyed projects are subject to practical attacks. Finally, we implement a TCSC prototype and conduct a comprehensive evaluation, revealing the overheads of distributed key management and the performance challenges of executing complex contracts within TEEs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security covers the sciences, technologies, and applications relating to information forensics, information security, biometrics, surveillance and systems applications that incorporate these features
期刊最新文献
Polar Coding for the Multiple Access Wiretap Channel with Partial Rate-Limited Feedback via Rate-Splitting Machine Learning Validation of a Physical Prime Random Number Generator Closing the Proof-of-Stake Security Gap: A Signature-Based Defense Against Malicious Validators in Long-Range Attacks ESCM: A Toolkit for Efficient and Secure Outsourced Computation with Multiple Keys Towards Robust Receiver-Invariant Specific Emitter Identification via Multi-Task Adversarial Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1