Marja Hult, Marjo Ring, Heta Siranko, Mari Kangasniemi
{"title":"护理和照顾工作者的体面工作和不稳定工作：混合方法系统回顾","authors":"Marja Hult, Marjo Ring, Heta Siranko, Mari Kangasniemi","doi":"10.1111/jan.16572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To identify and describe evidence from original studies on the contextual factors, dimensions, and outcomes of decent and precarious work among nursing and care workers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>This is a mixed-methods systematic review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\n \n <p>The Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SocINDEX databases were searched on January 11, 2024.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, selected studies, and conducted quality appraisals. We employed data-based convergent synthesis as the data synthesis method. The dimensions of decent and precarious work were analysed deductively using the Employment Quality Framework.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five studies on decent work and 13 studies on precarious work were included. Five contextual factors were common, though opposite, in both decent and precarious work studies: employment contract, position, financial situation, age, and work experience. Three outcomes were also common. Decent work increased, and precarious work decreased, physical and mental health and empowerment, whereas turnover was decreased by decent work and increased by precarious work.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Challenges can be converted into positive outcomes for the future, moving towards meaningful work, fair jobs, sustainable employment policies, and attractive career prospects. To achieve this, more knowledge is needed about employment quality in nursing and care work.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for the Profession</h3>\n \n <p>Young nurses and care workers should be provided opportunities to fully engage in their work and organisations. Training is also crucial for managers, as it decreases authoritarian and controlling management practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>This review is the first to synthesise research evidence on decent and precarious work in nursing and care work, confirming that they are opposite concepts of employment quality. The results benefit nurses and care workers, organisations, and decision-makers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>The study was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"81 6","pages":"2913-2928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16572","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decent and Precarious Work Among Nursing and Care Workers: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Marja Hult, Marjo Ring, Heta Siranko, Mari Kangasniemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To identify and describe evidence from original studies on the contextual factors, dimensions, and outcomes of decent and precarious work among nursing and care workers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is a mixed-methods systematic review.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SocINDEX databases were searched on January 11, 2024.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, selected studies, and conducted quality appraisals. We employed data-based convergent synthesis as the data synthesis method. The dimensions of decent and precarious work were analysed deductively using the Employment Quality Framework.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five studies on decent work and 13 studies on precarious work were included. Five contextual factors were common, though opposite, in both decent and precarious work studies: employment contract, position, financial situation, age, and work experience. Three outcomes were also common. Decent work increased, and precarious work decreased, physical and mental health and empowerment, whereas turnover was decreased by decent work and increased by precarious work.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Challenges can be converted into positive outcomes for the future, moving towards meaningful work, fair jobs, sustainable employment policies, and attractive career prospects. To achieve this, more knowledge is needed about employment quality in nursing and care work.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications for the Profession</h3>\\n \\n <p>Young nurses and care workers should be provided opportunities to fully engage in their work and organisations. Training is also crucial for managers, as it decreases authoritarian and controlling management practices.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Impact</h3>\\n \\n <p>This review is the first to synthesise research evidence on decent and precarious work in nursing and care work, confirming that they are opposite concepts of employment quality. The results benefit nurses and care workers, organisations, and decision-makers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"81 6\",\"pages\":\"2913-2928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16572\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16572\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decent and Precarious Work Among Nursing and Care Workers: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review
Aim
To identify and describe evidence from original studies on the contextual factors, dimensions, and outcomes of decent and precarious work among nursing and care workers.
Design
This is a mixed-methods systematic review.
Data Sources
The Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SocINDEX databases were searched on January 11, 2024.
Methods
Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, selected studies, and conducted quality appraisals. We employed data-based convergent synthesis as the data synthesis method. The dimensions of decent and precarious work were analysed deductively using the Employment Quality Framework.
Results
Five studies on decent work and 13 studies on precarious work were included. Five contextual factors were common, though opposite, in both decent and precarious work studies: employment contract, position, financial situation, age, and work experience. Three outcomes were also common. Decent work increased, and precarious work decreased, physical and mental health and empowerment, whereas turnover was decreased by decent work and increased by precarious work.
Conclusions
Challenges can be converted into positive outcomes for the future, moving towards meaningful work, fair jobs, sustainable employment policies, and attractive career prospects. To achieve this, more knowledge is needed about employment quality in nursing and care work.
Implications for the Profession
Young nurses and care workers should be provided opportunities to fully engage in their work and organisations. Training is also crucial for managers, as it decreases authoritarian and controlling management practices.
Impact
This review is the first to synthesise research evidence on decent and precarious work in nursing and care work, confirming that they are opposite concepts of employment quality. The results benefit nurses and care workers, organisations, and decision-makers.
Reporting Method
The study was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
