Federated Unlearning:关于方法、设计指南和评估指标的调查

IF 8.9 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3478334
Nicolò Romandini;Alessio Mora;Carlo Mazzocca;Rebecca Montanari;Paolo Bellavista
{"title":"Federated Unlearning:关于方法、设计指南和评估指标的调查","authors":"Nicolò Romandini;Alessio Mora;Carlo Mazzocca;Rebecca Montanari;Paolo Bellavista","doi":"10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3478334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training of a machine learning (ML) model across multiple parties, facilitating the preservation of users’ and institutions’ privacy by maintaining data stored locally. Instead of centralizing raw data, FL exchanges locally refined model parameters to build a global model incrementally. While FL is more compliant with emerging regulations such as the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), ensuring the right to be forgotten in this context—allowing FL participants to remove their data contributions from the learned model—remains unclear. In addition, it is recognized that malicious clients may inject backdoors into the global model through updates, e.g., to generate mispredictions on specially crafted data examples. Consequently, there is the need for mechanisms that can guarantee individuals the possibility to remove their data and erase malicious contributions even after aggregation, without compromising the already acquired “good” knowledge. This highlights the necessity for novel federated unlearning (FU) algorithms, which can efficiently remove specific clients’ contributions without full model retraining. This article provides background concepts, empirical evidence, and practical guidelines to design/implement efficient FU schemes. This study includes a detailed analysis of the metrics for evaluating unlearning in FL and presents an in-depth literature review categorizing state-of-the-art FU contributions under a novel taxonomy. Finally, we outline the most relevant and still open technical challenges, by identifying the most promising research directions in the field.","PeriodicalId":13303,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems","volume":"36 7","pages":"11697-11717"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10736348","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Federated Unlearning: A Survey on Methods, Design Guidelines, and Evaluation Metrics\",\"authors\":\"Nicolò Romandini;Alessio Mora;Carlo Mazzocca;Rebecca Montanari;Paolo Bellavista\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3478334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training of a machine learning (ML) model across multiple parties, facilitating the preservation of users’ and institutions’ privacy by maintaining data stored locally. Instead of centralizing raw data, FL exchanges locally refined model parameters to build a global model incrementally. While FL is more compliant with emerging regulations such as the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), ensuring the right to be forgotten in this context—allowing FL participants to remove their data contributions from the learned model—remains unclear. In addition, it is recognized that malicious clients may inject backdoors into the global model through updates, e.g., to generate mispredictions on specially crafted data examples. Consequently, there is the need for mechanisms that can guarantee individuals the possibility to remove their data and erase malicious contributions even after aggregation, without compromising the already acquired “good” knowledge. This highlights the necessity for novel federated unlearning (FU) algorithms, which can efficiently remove specific clients’ contributions without full model retraining. This article provides background concepts, empirical evidence, and practical guidelines to design/implement efficient FU schemes. This study includes a detailed analysis of the metrics for evaluating unlearning in FL and presents an in-depth literature review categorizing state-of-the-art FU contributions under a novel taxonomy. Finally, we outline the most relevant and still open technical challenges, by identifying the most promising research directions in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems\",\"volume\":\"36 7\",\"pages\":\"11697-11717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10736348\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10736348/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10736348/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联邦学习(FL)支持跨多方协作训练机器学习(ML)模型,通过维护本地存储的数据来促进用户和机构隐私的保护。FL不是集中原始数据,而是交换局部精炼的模型参数,以增量方式构建全局模型。虽然FL更符合欧洲通用数据保护条例(GDPR)等新兴法规,但在这种情况下确保被遗忘的权利(允许FL参与者从学习模型中删除他们的数据贡献)仍然不清楚。此外,人们认识到恶意客户端可能通过更新向全局模型注入后门,例如,在特制的数据示例上生成错误预测。因此,需要有一种机制,可以保证个人有可能删除他们的数据,甚至在汇总之后消除恶意贡献,而不会损害已经获得的“好”知识。这突出了新型联合学习(FU)算法的必要性,该算法可以在不进行完整模型再训练的情况下有效地去除特定客户端的贡献。本文提供了设计/实现高效的FU方案的背景概念、经验证据和实践指南。本研究包括对外语学习中评估遗忘的指标的详细分析,并在一种新的分类下对最先进的外语学习贡献进行了深入的文献综述。最后,我们通过确定该领域最有前途的研究方向,概述了最相关和仍然开放的技术挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Federated Unlearning: A Survey on Methods, Design Guidelines, and Evaluation Metrics
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training of a machine learning (ML) model across multiple parties, facilitating the preservation of users’ and institutions’ privacy by maintaining data stored locally. Instead of centralizing raw data, FL exchanges locally refined model parameters to build a global model incrementally. While FL is more compliant with emerging regulations such as the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), ensuring the right to be forgotten in this context—allowing FL participants to remove their data contributions from the learned model—remains unclear. In addition, it is recognized that malicious clients may inject backdoors into the global model through updates, e.g., to generate mispredictions on specially crafted data examples. Consequently, there is the need for mechanisms that can guarantee individuals the possibility to remove their data and erase malicious contributions even after aggregation, without compromising the already acquired “good” knowledge. This highlights the necessity for novel federated unlearning (FU) algorithms, which can efficiently remove specific clients’ contributions without full model retraining. This article provides background concepts, empirical evidence, and practical guidelines to design/implement efficient FU schemes. This study includes a detailed analysis of the metrics for evaluating unlearning in FL and presents an in-depth literature review categorizing state-of-the-art FU contributions under a novel taxonomy. Finally, we outline the most relevant and still open technical challenges, by identifying the most promising research directions in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems
IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
CiteScore
23.80
自引率
9.60%
发文量
2102
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The focus of IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems is to present scholarly articles discussing the theory, design, and applications of neural networks as well as other learning systems. The journal primarily highlights technical and scientific research in this domain.
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal Context-Aware Prompting With Low-Rank Dynamic Routing for Exemplar-Free Video Class-Incremental Learning. Toward Effective Graph Long-Tailed Learning With Noisy Labels. An Uncertainty-Aware Ensemble Approach to Modeling Utility of Pseudolabels for Semisupervised Learning. Structure-Guided Domain-Adaptive Network for Few-Shot SAR Ship Detection. Interpreting the Observed Behavior of a Class of Autonomous Linear Systems Using Explainable Inverse Reinforcement Learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1