关于:在常规心肺复苏术中启动体外膜肺氧合的时间会影响患者的生存预后。

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1111/joim.20022
Xiao Liu, Bo Liu, Minli Yang, Liu Yang, Jun Wang
{"title":"关于:在常规心肺复苏术中启动体外膜肺氧合的时间会影响患者的生存预后。","authors":"Xiao Liu,&nbsp;Bo Liu,&nbsp;Minli Yang,&nbsp;Liu Yang,&nbsp;Jun Wang","doi":"10.1111/joim.20022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article by Sim et al. [<span>1</span>] in the <i>Journal of Internal Medicine</i> emphasized the critical role of timely ECMO application in optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing ECPR. While recognizing the careful work and valuable contributions of this study, there are some constructive suggestions for future advancement.</p><p>First, although the study accounted for various adjustment factors, it may have overlooked some potential influencing variables, such as patient comorbidities or changes in treatment protocols following ECMO initiation. These factors could affect the reliability and validity of the study's results [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Second, in the study, the Cox proportional hazards assumption may be violated for several reasons: time dependency: If the effect of ECMO initiation on survival varies over time, it breaches the assumption that hazard ratios remain constant throughout the study period; sample heterogeneity: Variability in patient characteristics within the sample may cause fluctuations in hazard ratios, thus violating the proportionality assumption; lack of testing: Without assessing the proportional hazards assumption using methods like Schoenfeld residuals, undetected violations could compromise the model's validity. Addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring the robustness and accuracy of the Cox regression analysis [<span>3</span>].</p><p>Third, the study primarily focuses on short-term outcomes (e.g., 30 days, 90 days, and 6 months), and there may be insufficient assessment of long-term survival and quality of life [<span>4</span>]. It is recommended that future research includes extended follow-up periods to obtain more comprehensive prognostic information.</p><p>In conclusion, the results of this study emphasize that the early initiation of ECMO during ECPR significantly improves short- and long-term overall survival outcomes. It highlights the need for prospective, multi-center research, long-term follow-up, standardized protocols, and optimization of procedures to improve clinical practices and patient survival.</p><p><b>Xiao Liu</b>: Conceptualization; methodology; writing—original draft; validation. <b>Bo Liu</b>: Writing—review and editing. <b>Minli Yang</b>: Methodology; supervision. <b>Liu Yang</b>: Methodology; writing—review and editing. <b>Jun Wang</b>: Writing—review and editing; supervision.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"296 6","pages":"535-536"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.20022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regarding: Time to initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation affects the patient survival prognosis\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Liu,&nbsp;Bo Liu,&nbsp;Minli Yang,&nbsp;Liu Yang,&nbsp;Jun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joim.20022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The article by Sim et al. [<span>1</span>] in the <i>Journal of Internal Medicine</i> emphasized the critical role of timely ECMO application in optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing ECPR. While recognizing the careful work and valuable contributions of this study, there are some constructive suggestions for future advancement.</p><p>First, although the study accounted for various adjustment factors, it may have overlooked some potential influencing variables, such as patient comorbidities or changes in treatment protocols following ECMO initiation. These factors could affect the reliability and validity of the study's results [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Second, in the study, the Cox proportional hazards assumption may be violated for several reasons: time dependency: If the effect of ECMO initiation on survival varies over time, it breaches the assumption that hazard ratios remain constant throughout the study period; sample heterogeneity: Variability in patient characteristics within the sample may cause fluctuations in hazard ratios, thus violating the proportionality assumption; lack of testing: Without assessing the proportional hazards assumption using methods like Schoenfeld residuals, undetected violations could compromise the model's validity. Addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring the robustness and accuracy of the Cox regression analysis [<span>3</span>].</p><p>Third, the study primarily focuses on short-term outcomes (e.g., 30 days, 90 days, and 6 months), and there may be insufficient assessment of long-term survival and quality of life [<span>4</span>]. It is recommended that future research includes extended follow-up periods to obtain more comprehensive prognostic information.</p><p>In conclusion, the results of this study emphasize that the early initiation of ECMO during ECPR significantly improves short- and long-term overall survival outcomes. It highlights the need for prospective, multi-center research, long-term follow-up, standardized protocols, and optimization of procedures to improve clinical practices and patient survival.</p><p><b>Xiao Liu</b>: Conceptualization; methodology; writing—original draft; validation. <b>Bo Liu</b>: Writing—review and editing. <b>Minli Yang</b>: Methodology; supervision. <b>Liu Yang</b>: Methodology; writing—review and editing. <b>Jun Wang</b>: Writing—review and editing; supervision.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"296 6\",\"pages\":\"535-536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.20022\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.20022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.20022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Sim 等人在《内科学杂志》上发表的文章[1]强调了及时应用 ECMO 对优化 ECPR 患者预后的关键作用。首先,尽管该研究考虑了各种调整因素,但可能忽略了一些潜在的影响变量,如患者的合并症或 ECMO 启动后治疗方案的变化。这些因素可能会影响研究结果的可靠性和有效性[2]。其次,在该研究中,由于以下几个原因,可能违反了 Cox 比例危险假设:时间依赖性:如果启动 ECMO 对存活率的影响随时间而变化,则违反了危险比在整个研究期间保持不变的假设;样本异质性:样本中患者特征的差异可能会导致危险比的波动,从而违反比例假设;缺乏检验:如果不使用 Schoenfeld residuals 等方法评估比例危险假设,未发现的违规行为可能会影响模型的有效性。解决这些问题对于确保 Cox 回归分析的稳健性和准确性至关重要[3]。第三,该研究主要关注短期结果(如 30 天、90 天和 6 个月),对长期生存和生活质量的评估可能不足[4]。总之,本研究结果强调,在 ECPR 期间尽早启动 ECMO 可显著改善短期和长期总体生存结果。该研究强调了前瞻性多中心研究、长期随访、标准化方案和优化程序的必要性,以改善临床实践和患者生存。刘波:写作-审稿和编辑。杨敏莉方法学;指导。杨柳方法学;写作-审阅和编辑。王军作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regarding: Time to initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation affects the patient survival prognosis

The article by Sim et al. [1] in the Journal of Internal Medicine emphasized the critical role of timely ECMO application in optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing ECPR. While recognizing the careful work and valuable contributions of this study, there are some constructive suggestions for future advancement.

First, although the study accounted for various adjustment factors, it may have overlooked some potential influencing variables, such as patient comorbidities or changes in treatment protocols following ECMO initiation. These factors could affect the reliability and validity of the study's results [2].

Second, in the study, the Cox proportional hazards assumption may be violated for several reasons: time dependency: If the effect of ECMO initiation on survival varies over time, it breaches the assumption that hazard ratios remain constant throughout the study period; sample heterogeneity: Variability in patient characteristics within the sample may cause fluctuations in hazard ratios, thus violating the proportionality assumption; lack of testing: Without assessing the proportional hazards assumption using methods like Schoenfeld residuals, undetected violations could compromise the model's validity. Addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring the robustness and accuracy of the Cox regression analysis [3].

Third, the study primarily focuses on short-term outcomes (e.g., 30 days, 90 days, and 6 months), and there may be insufficient assessment of long-term survival and quality of life [4]. It is recommended that future research includes extended follow-up periods to obtain more comprehensive prognostic information.

In conclusion, the results of this study emphasize that the early initiation of ECMO during ECPR significantly improves short- and long-term overall survival outcomes. It highlights the need for prospective, multi-center research, long-term follow-up, standardized protocols, and optimization of procedures to improve clinical practices and patient survival.

Xiao Liu: Conceptualization; methodology; writing—original draft; validation. Bo Liu: Writing—review and editing. Minli Yang: Methodology; supervision. Liu Yang: Methodology; writing—review and editing. Jun Wang: Writing—review and editing; supervision.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Internal Medicine
Journal of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JIM – The Journal of Internal Medicine, in continuous publication since 1863, is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original work in clinical science, spanning from bench to bedside, encompassing a wide range of internal medicine and its subspecialties. JIM showcases original articles, reviews, brief reports, and research letters in the field of internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic BCG vaccine protects against long COVID: The BATTLE randomized clinical trial. Different ways of diagnosing selective glomerular hypofiltration syndromes such as shrunken pore syndrome and the associated increase in mortality. Statin-associated regulation of hepatic PNPLA3 in patients without known liver disease. Issue Information Association among major adverse cardiovascular events with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1