等离子刀通过鼻外侧壁切口烧灼治疗后鼻衄。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2024.2416598
Ning Zhou, Dan Su, Junjie Ma
{"title":"等离子刀通过鼻外侧壁切口烧灼治疗后鼻衄。","authors":"Ning Zhou, Dan Su, Junjie Ma","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2416598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery cauterization (ESPAC) has become an important method to manage posterior epistaxis.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>To investigate the application of plasma knife and lateral nasal wall incision in ESPAC in the treatment of posterior epistaxis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 32 cases who underwent ESPAC for epistaxis was conducted. A vertical incision was made on the lateral nasal well to expose the sphenopalatine artery (SPA). The main branches of SPA were cauterized with a plasma knife or bipolar coagulation forceps. Cases were divided into plasma knife group (group PK) and bipolar group (group BP). The re-bleeding rates, operation time and the incidence of serious complication were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ESPAC was successfully completed <i>via</i> a lateral nasal wall incision without maxillary antrostomy in all cases. All the patients were followed-up for 3 months, no serious complication was reported. There was no significant difference in re-bleeding rates and incidence of serious complication between the two groups. The operation time of group PK was shorter than group BP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Lateral nasal well incision without maxillary antrostomy is feasible for ESPAC. The application of a plasma knife may help to shorten the operation time.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"627-630"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma knife sphenopalatine artery cauterization via lateral nasal wall incision for posterior epistaxis.\",\"authors\":\"Ning Zhou, Dan Su, Junjie Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2416598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery cauterization (ESPAC) has become an important method to manage posterior epistaxis.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>To investigate the application of plasma knife and lateral nasal wall incision in ESPAC in the treatment of posterior epistaxis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 32 cases who underwent ESPAC for epistaxis was conducted. A vertical incision was made on the lateral nasal well to expose the sphenopalatine artery (SPA). The main branches of SPA were cauterized with a plasma knife or bipolar coagulation forceps. Cases were divided into plasma knife group (group PK) and bipolar group (group BP). The re-bleeding rates, operation time and the incidence of serious complication were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ESPAC was successfully completed <i>via</i> a lateral nasal wall incision without maxillary antrostomy in all cases. All the patients were followed-up for 3 months, no serious complication was reported. There was no significant difference in re-bleeding rates and incidence of serious complication between the two groups. The operation time of group PK was shorter than group BP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Lateral nasal well incision without maxillary antrostomy is feasible for ESPAC. The application of a plasma knife may help to shorten the operation time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"627-630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2416598\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2416598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜下鼻腭动脉烧灼术(ESPAC)已成为治疗后鼻衄的重要方法:研究等离子刀和鼻侧壁切口在ESPAC治疗后鼻衄中的应用:对32例接受ESPAC治疗鼻衄的病例进行回顾性研究。在鼻外侧井上做垂直切口,暴露蝶骨动脉(SPA)。用等离子刀或双极电凝钳烧灼 SPA 的主要分支。病例分为等离子刀组(PK 组)和双极组(BP 组)。比较了两组的再出血率、手术时间和严重并发症的发生率:所有病例均通过鼻侧壁切口成功完成了ESPAC手术,未进行上颌前路切除术。所有患者均接受了 3 个月的随访,无严重并发症报告。两组患者的再出血率和严重并发症发生率无明显差异。PK 组的手术时间短于 BP 组:结论和意义:鼻侧井切口而不进行上颌前路切除术是ESPAC的可行方法。应用等离子刀可能有助于缩短手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plasma knife sphenopalatine artery cauterization via lateral nasal wall incision for posterior epistaxis.

Background: Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery cauterization (ESPAC) has become an important method to manage posterior epistaxis.

Aims/objectives: To investigate the application of plasma knife and lateral nasal wall incision in ESPAC in the treatment of posterior epistaxis.

Material and methods: A retrospective study of 32 cases who underwent ESPAC for epistaxis was conducted. A vertical incision was made on the lateral nasal well to expose the sphenopalatine artery (SPA). The main branches of SPA were cauterized with a plasma knife or bipolar coagulation forceps. Cases were divided into plasma knife group (group PK) and bipolar group (group BP). The re-bleeding rates, operation time and the incidence of serious complication were compared between the two groups.

Results: ESPAC was successfully completed via a lateral nasal wall incision without maxillary antrostomy in all cases. All the patients were followed-up for 3 months, no serious complication was reported. There was no significant difference in re-bleeding rates and incidence of serious complication between the two groups. The operation time of group PK was shorter than group BP.

Conclusions and significance: Lateral nasal well incision without maxillary antrostomy is feasible for ESPAC. The application of a plasma knife may help to shorten the operation time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic endonasal surgery and radiotherapy in skull base chordomas: a 20-year retrospective analysis of long-term outcomes and prognostic factors. Evaluating the Impact of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Resection of Juvenile Nasopharyngeal AngiofibromaEvaluating the impact of intraoperative MRI on the resection of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Correlation between residual dizziness after repositioning of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and motion sickness: an observational study. Surgical injuries and underlying factors in novice's mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy training. Endoscopic-assisted versus conventional closed septorhinoplasty: a comparative study of functional, aesthetic, and postoperative outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1