褪黑素作为引产辅助药物的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验:MILO 试验。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14951
Diane Quach, Ben W Mol, Jamie Springer, Erin Tully, Chloe Higgins, Madeleine Jones, David Hennes, Yen Pham, Kamala Swarnamani, Kirsten Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck
{"title":"褪黑素作为引产辅助药物的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验:MILO 试验。","authors":"Diane Quach, Ben W Mol, Jamie Springer, Erin Tully, Chloe Higgins, Madeleine Jones, David Hennes, Yen Pham, Kamala Swarnamani, Kirsten Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Melatonin has been suggested to have a biological role in the onset and progress of labor. We tested the hypothesis that the addition of melatonin during an induction of labor will reduce the need for a cesarean birth.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This trial underwent protocol amendments that are detailed in the main text of the article. This trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000311459). At a multi-center health service including secondary and tertiary obstetric hospitals, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in women with a singleton cephalic pregnancy, free of significant maternal or perinatal complications who were undergoing induction of labor (with or without cervical ripening). Women were randomized to 10 mg melatonin vs placebo, with cervical ripening as required, and then 6-h during their induction of labor to a maximum of four doses or until birth. The primary outcome was cesarean birth. Secondary outcomes included labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using intention to treat. Sub-group analyses based on mode of ripening and parity were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2019 and 2021 we randomized 189 women (103 to melatonin and 86 to placebo). The study was prematurely terminated due to logistical complications resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Cesarean rates were 28/103 (27.2%) in the melatonin group versus 20/84 (23.3%) in the placebo group (RR 1.17 95% CI 0.71-1.92). There were no significant differences in rate of cesarean birth between the melatonin and placebo groups for failure to progress (13.4% and 9.3%, respectively, RR 1.46; 95% CI 0.64-3.32) or suspected fetal distress (10.7% and 10.5%, respectively, RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.44-2.34). The melatonin group had significantly lower rates of spontaneous vaginal birth within 24 h (35.0% vs. 50.0%; RR 0.70 95% CI 0.50-0.98). The rates of secondary outcomes such as total length of labor, rate of postpartum hemorrhage, and instrumental birth were comparable. Babies born in the melatonin group were more likely to need admission to the special care nursery, namely for hypoglycemic monitoring (18.5% vs. 8.1% RR 2.26; 95% CI 1.00-5.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In women undergoing induction of labor, melatonin does not reduce the cesarean section rate. Melatonin use intrapartum may also be associated with neonatal hypoglycemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of melatonin as an adjuvant agent for induction of labor: The MILO trial.\",\"authors\":\"Diane Quach, Ben W Mol, Jamie Springer, Erin Tully, Chloe Higgins, Madeleine Jones, David Hennes, Yen Pham, Kamala Swarnamani, Kirsten Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aogs.14951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Melatonin has been suggested to have a biological role in the onset and progress of labor. We tested the hypothesis that the addition of melatonin during an induction of labor will reduce the need for a cesarean birth.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This trial underwent protocol amendments that are detailed in the main text of the article. This trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000311459). At a multi-center health service including secondary and tertiary obstetric hospitals, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in women with a singleton cephalic pregnancy, free of significant maternal or perinatal complications who were undergoing induction of labor (with or without cervical ripening). Women were randomized to 10 mg melatonin vs placebo, with cervical ripening as required, and then 6-h during their induction of labor to a maximum of four doses or until birth. The primary outcome was cesarean birth. Secondary outcomes included labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using intention to treat. Sub-group analyses based on mode of ripening and parity were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2019 and 2021 we randomized 189 women (103 to melatonin and 86 to placebo). The study was prematurely terminated due to logistical complications resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Cesarean rates were 28/103 (27.2%) in the melatonin group versus 20/84 (23.3%) in the placebo group (RR 1.17 95% CI 0.71-1.92). There were no significant differences in rate of cesarean birth between the melatonin and placebo groups for failure to progress (13.4% and 9.3%, respectively, RR 1.46; 95% CI 0.64-3.32) or suspected fetal distress (10.7% and 10.5%, respectively, RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.44-2.34). The melatonin group had significantly lower rates of spontaneous vaginal birth within 24 h (35.0% vs. 50.0%; RR 0.70 95% CI 0.50-0.98). The rates of secondary outcomes such as total length of labor, rate of postpartum hemorrhage, and instrumental birth were comparable. Babies born in the melatonin group were more likely to need admission to the special care nursery, namely for hypoglycemic monitoring (18.5% vs. 8.1% RR 2.26; 95% CI 1.00-5.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In women undergoing induction of labor, melatonin does not reduce the cesarean section rate. Melatonin use intrapartum may also be associated with neonatal hypoglycemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14951\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14951","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介褪黑素被认为对分娩的开始和进展具有生物学作用。我们对以下假设进行了测试:在引产过程中添加褪黑素将减少剖宫产的需要:本试验对方案进行了修订,详见文章正文。该试验已在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心注册(ACTRN12616000311459)。我们在一家包括二级和三级产科医院在内的多中心医疗服务机构开展了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,对象是单胎头位妊娠、无明显母体或围产期并发症、正在接受引产(宫颈成熟或不成熟)的妇女。妇女被随机分配使用 10 毫克褪黑素与安慰剂,根据需要进行宫颈催熟,然后在引产期间 6 小时内使用,最多使用四次或直到分娩。主要结果为剖宫产。次要结局包括分娩、产妇和新生儿结局。数据采用意向治疗法进行分析。还根据成熟方式和胎次进行了分组分析:在 2019 年至 2021 年期间,我们随机选取了 189 名产妇(103 名产妇使用褪黑素,86 名产妇使用安慰剂)。由于 COVID-19 大流行导致的后勤并发症,研究提前结束。褪黑素组的剖宫产率为 28/103(27.2%),安慰剂组为 20/84(23.3%)(RR 1.17 95% CI 0.71-1.92)。褪黑素组和安慰剂组的剖宫产率没有明显差异,原因分别是胎儿发育不良(分别为13.4%和9.3%,RR 1.46;95% CI 0.64-3.32)或疑似胎儿窘迫(分别为10.7%和10.5%,RR 1.02;95% CI 0.44-2.34)。褪黑素组 24 小时内自然阴道分娩率明显较低(35.0% 对 50.0%;RR 0.70 95% CI 0.50-0.98)。总产程、产后出血率和器械助产等次要结果的比率相当。褪黑素组出生的婴儿更有可能需要入住特殊护理室,即接受低血糖监测(18.5% vs. 8.1% RR 2.26; 95% CI 1.00-5.10):在接受引产的妇女中,褪黑素不会降低剖宫产率。产前使用褪黑素还可能与新生儿低血糖有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of melatonin as an adjuvant agent for induction of labor: The MILO trial.

Introduction: Melatonin has been suggested to have a biological role in the onset and progress of labor. We tested the hypothesis that the addition of melatonin during an induction of labor will reduce the need for a cesarean birth.

Material and methods: This trial underwent protocol amendments that are detailed in the main text of the article. This trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000311459). At a multi-center health service including secondary and tertiary obstetric hospitals, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in women with a singleton cephalic pregnancy, free of significant maternal or perinatal complications who were undergoing induction of labor (with or without cervical ripening). Women were randomized to 10 mg melatonin vs placebo, with cervical ripening as required, and then 6-h during their induction of labor to a maximum of four doses or until birth. The primary outcome was cesarean birth. Secondary outcomes included labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using intention to treat. Sub-group analyses based on mode of ripening and parity were also performed.

Results: Between 2019 and 2021 we randomized 189 women (103 to melatonin and 86 to placebo). The study was prematurely terminated due to logistical complications resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Cesarean rates were 28/103 (27.2%) in the melatonin group versus 20/84 (23.3%) in the placebo group (RR 1.17 95% CI 0.71-1.92). There were no significant differences in rate of cesarean birth between the melatonin and placebo groups for failure to progress (13.4% and 9.3%, respectively, RR 1.46; 95% CI 0.64-3.32) or suspected fetal distress (10.7% and 10.5%, respectively, RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.44-2.34). The melatonin group had significantly lower rates of spontaneous vaginal birth within 24 h (35.0% vs. 50.0%; RR 0.70 95% CI 0.50-0.98). The rates of secondary outcomes such as total length of labor, rate of postpartum hemorrhage, and instrumental birth were comparable. Babies born in the melatonin group were more likely to need admission to the special care nursery, namely for hypoglycemic monitoring (18.5% vs. 8.1% RR 2.26; 95% CI 1.00-5.10).

Conclusions: In women undergoing induction of labor, melatonin does not reduce the cesarean section rate. Melatonin use intrapartum may also be associated with neonatal hypoglycemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study. Maternal asthma during pregnancy and the likelihood of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study. The interplay of body mass index, gestational weight gain, and birthweight over 3800 g in vaginal breech birth: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1