Mustafa Korkut, Alpaslan Yavuz, Fatih Selvi, Ökkeş Zortuk, Erdinç Hakan İnan, Hasan Can Güven
{"title":"急性肺栓塞患者的 Bova、sPESI 和 Qanadli 评分的预后性能。","authors":"Mustafa Korkut, Alpaslan Yavuz, Fatih Selvi, Ökkeş Zortuk, Erdinç Hakan İnan, Hasan Can Güven","doi":"10.1177/02841851241289693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a disease with a serious prognosis and a high probability of death in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the prediction of PE-related mortality and intensive care admission (ICU) of Qanadli (Qscore), Bova, and simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) scores.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study consisted of all patients diagnosed with acute PE who were imaged under computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for a total of 5 years between 1 June 2018 and 1 June 2023. The prediction of radiological and clinical scores for mortality and ICU admission was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 patients were analyzed. Patients who died and those who were admitted to the ICU had a significantly higher frequency of being found to have a high-risk (≥1) sPESI score (<i>P</i> = 0.04 and <i>P</i> = 0.016, respectively). For mortality, the sPESI score was found to be significant; the sensitivity and specificity were observed as 54% and 66% (area under the curve [AUC]=0.670, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.527-0.814; <i>P</i> = 0.020). For ICU admission, the sensitivity and specificity of the Qscore, sPESI, and Bova scores were 35%, 77%, and 58%, and 78%, 65%, and 84% respectively (AUC=0.626, 95% CI=0.511-0.740, <i>P</i> = 0.031; AUC=0.769, 95% CI=0.674-0.865, <i>P</i> < 0.001; and AUC=0.767, 95% CI=0.671-0.862, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that the sPESI score was effective at predicting mortality in patients with acute PE. Qscore, sPESI, and Bova scores have been shown to be useful in predicting ICU admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851241289693"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic performance of the Bova, sPESI, and Qanadli scores in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Korkut, Alpaslan Yavuz, Fatih Selvi, Ökkeş Zortuk, Erdinç Hakan İnan, Hasan Can Güven\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02841851241289693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a disease with a serious prognosis and a high probability of death in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the prediction of PE-related mortality and intensive care admission (ICU) of Qanadli (Qscore), Bova, and simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) scores.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study consisted of all patients diagnosed with acute PE who were imaged under computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for a total of 5 years between 1 June 2018 and 1 June 2023. The prediction of radiological and clinical scores for mortality and ICU admission was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 patients were analyzed. Patients who died and those who were admitted to the ICU had a significantly higher frequency of being found to have a high-risk (≥1) sPESI score (<i>P</i> = 0.04 and <i>P</i> = 0.016, respectively). For mortality, the sPESI score was found to be significant; the sensitivity and specificity were observed as 54% and 66% (area under the curve [AUC]=0.670, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.527-0.814; <i>P</i> = 0.020). For ICU admission, the sensitivity and specificity of the Qscore, sPESI, and Bova scores were 35%, 77%, and 58%, and 78%, 65%, and 84% respectively (AUC=0.626, 95% CI=0.511-0.740, <i>P</i> = 0.031; AUC=0.769, 95% CI=0.674-0.865, <i>P</i> < 0.001; and AUC=0.767, 95% CI=0.671-0.862, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that the sPESI score was effective at predicting mortality in patients with acute PE. Qscore, sPESI, and Bova scores have been shown to be useful in predicting ICU admission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2841851241289693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241289693\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241289693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目的:研究Qanadli(Qscore)、Bova和简化肺栓塞严重程度指数(sPESI)评分对PE相关死亡率和重症监护入院(ICU)的预测:这项回顾性观察研究包括2018年6月1日至2023年6月1日期间,在计算机断层扫描肺血管造影(CTPA)下成像的所有确诊为急性PE的患者,共计5年。研究了放射学和临床评分对死亡率和入住重症监护室的预测:共对 95 名患者进行了分析。死亡患者和入住重症监护室的患者被发现具有高风险(≥1)sPESI 评分的频率明显更高(分别为 P = 0.04 和 P = 0.016)。就死亡率而言,sPESI 评分具有重要意义;敏感性和特异性分别为 54% 和 66%(曲线下面积 [AUC]=0.670, 95% 置信区间 [CI]=0.527-0.814; P = 0.020)。对于入住 ICU 的患者,Qscore、sPESI 和 Bova 评分的敏感性和特异性分别为 35%、77% 和 58%,以及 78%、65% 和 84%(AUC=0.626,95% CI=0.511-0.740,P=0.031;AUC=0.769,95% CI=0.674-0.865,P P 结论:研究发现,sPESI 评分能有效预测急性 PE 患者的死亡率。Qscore、sPESI 和 Bova 评分已被证明可用于预测入住 ICU 的情况。
Prognostic performance of the Bova, sPESI, and Qanadli scores in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.
Background: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a disease with a serious prognosis and a high probability of death in the emergency department.
Purpose: To investigate the prediction of PE-related mortality and intensive care admission (ICU) of Qanadli (Qscore), Bova, and simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) scores.
Material and methods: This retrospective observational study consisted of all patients diagnosed with acute PE who were imaged under computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for a total of 5 years between 1 June 2018 and 1 June 2023. The prediction of radiological and clinical scores for mortality and ICU admission was examined.
Results: A total of 95 patients were analyzed. Patients who died and those who were admitted to the ICU had a significantly higher frequency of being found to have a high-risk (≥1) sPESI score (P = 0.04 and P = 0.016, respectively). For mortality, the sPESI score was found to be significant; the sensitivity and specificity were observed as 54% and 66% (area under the curve [AUC]=0.670, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.527-0.814; P = 0.020). For ICU admission, the sensitivity and specificity of the Qscore, sPESI, and Bova scores were 35%, 77%, and 58%, and 78%, 65%, and 84% respectively (AUC=0.626, 95% CI=0.511-0.740, P = 0.031; AUC=0.769, 95% CI=0.674-0.865, P < 0.001; and AUC=0.767, 95% CI=0.671-0.862, P < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: It was found that the sPESI score was effective at predicting mortality in patients with acute PE. Qscore, sPESI, and Bova scores have been shown to be useful in predicting ICU admission.
期刊介绍:
Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.