{"title":"肩胛韧带外伤后的手术修复:文献研究。","authors":"T DE Schepper, J Batselier, N Hollevoet","doi":"10.52628/90.2.12790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and research aims: </strong>Scapholunate interosseous ligament rupture can cause wrist issues like pain, strength loss, and cartilage degeneration. While various surgical treatments exist, it's unclear which method is optimal. This study aims to determine the superior treatment approach for scapholunate dissociation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science was searched for articles reporting results of surgical repair of scapholunate dissociation. Additional inclusion criteria were English- and Dutch-language articles published between January 2000 and December 2022 with at least 8 patients and at least 1 year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen articles were included, 9 covered tenodesis repair, 2 focused on capsulodesis, 3 on direct scapholunate ligament repair using bone anchors, and 3 on a combination of tenodesis and capsulodesis. No difference could be found between the types of surgical techniques in wrist mobility and grip strength. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Visual Analogue Scale for pain and Mayo wrist scores showed no clinically relevant difference. With all methods, normal radiological values were obtained after surgery. The mean scapholunate angle was less than 60° and the scapholunate gap less than 3 mm. However, at longer follow-up an increase in this angle and gap was seen again.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review did not allow to conclude that one technique was better than another to treat scapholunate dissociation because of poor quality of the included studies. Pre- and postoperative values were not always reported, there were insufficient comparative studies, and randomized prospective studies were missing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"90 2","pages":"239-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical repair of posttraumatic injuries of the scapholunate ligament: A literature study.\",\"authors\":\"T DE Schepper, J Batselier, N Hollevoet\",\"doi\":\"10.52628/90.2.12790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and research aims: </strong>Scapholunate interosseous ligament rupture can cause wrist issues like pain, strength loss, and cartilage degeneration. While various surgical treatments exist, it's unclear which method is optimal. This study aims to determine the superior treatment approach for scapholunate dissociation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science was searched for articles reporting results of surgical repair of scapholunate dissociation. Additional inclusion criteria were English- and Dutch-language articles published between January 2000 and December 2022 with at least 8 patients and at least 1 year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen articles were included, 9 covered tenodesis repair, 2 focused on capsulodesis, 3 on direct scapholunate ligament repair using bone anchors, and 3 on a combination of tenodesis and capsulodesis. No difference could be found between the types of surgical techniques in wrist mobility and grip strength. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Visual Analogue Scale for pain and Mayo wrist scores showed no clinically relevant difference. With all methods, normal radiological values were obtained after surgery. The mean scapholunate angle was less than 60° and the scapholunate gap less than 3 mm. However, at longer follow-up an increase in this angle and gap was seen again.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review did not allow to conclude that one technique was better than another to treat scapholunate dissociation because of poor quality of the included studies. Pre- and postoperative values were not always reported, there were insufficient comparative studies, and randomized prospective studies were missing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"90 2\",\"pages\":\"239-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52628/90.2.12790\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/90.2.12790","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和研究目的:肩胛骨骨间韧带断裂会导致腕部疼痛、力量下降和软骨退化等问题。虽然存在各种手术治疗方法,但目前还不清楚哪种方法是最佳的。本研究旨在确定肩胛韧带离断的最佳治疗方法:方法:在 Pubmed、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中搜索报告肩胛骨分离手术修复结果的文章。其他纳入标准为2000年1月至2022年12月期间发表的英语和荷兰语文章,且至少有8名患者和至少1年的随访:结果:共纳入17篇文章,其中9篇涉及腱膜修补术,2篇侧重于关节囊修补术,3篇涉及使用骨锚直接修补肩胛韧带,3篇涉及腱膜修补术和关节囊修补术的组合。不同类型的手术技术在腕关节活动度和握力方面没有差异。手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分、疼痛视觉模拟量表和梅奥腕部评分均未显示出临床相关性差异。所有方法在术后都能获得正常的放射学数值。平均肩胛骨角度小于 60°,肩胛骨间隙小于 3 毫米。然而,在较长时间的随访中,该角度和间隙再次出现增大:讨论:由于所纳入研究的质量不高,本综述无法得出结论说一种技术比另一种技术更适合治疗肩胛骨分离。并不总是报告术前和术后的数值,比较研究不足,也缺少随机前瞻性研究。
Surgical repair of posttraumatic injuries of the scapholunate ligament: A literature study.
Background and research aims: Scapholunate interosseous ligament rupture can cause wrist issues like pain, strength loss, and cartilage degeneration. While various surgical treatments exist, it's unclear which method is optimal. This study aims to determine the superior treatment approach for scapholunate dissociation.
Methods: In Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science was searched for articles reporting results of surgical repair of scapholunate dissociation. Additional inclusion criteria were English- and Dutch-language articles published between January 2000 and December 2022 with at least 8 patients and at least 1 year of follow-up.
Results: Seventeen articles were included, 9 covered tenodesis repair, 2 focused on capsulodesis, 3 on direct scapholunate ligament repair using bone anchors, and 3 on a combination of tenodesis and capsulodesis. No difference could be found between the types of surgical techniques in wrist mobility and grip strength. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Visual Analogue Scale for pain and Mayo wrist scores showed no clinically relevant difference. With all methods, normal radiological values were obtained after surgery. The mean scapholunate angle was less than 60° and the scapholunate gap less than 3 mm. However, at longer follow-up an increase in this angle and gap was seen again.
Discussion: This review did not allow to conclude that one technique was better than another to treat scapholunate dissociation because of poor quality of the included studies. Pre- and postoperative values were not always reported, there were insufficient comparative studies, and randomized prospective studies were missing.