影响多发性硬化症患者坚持体育锻炼的因素:一项系统综述,重点关注体育锻炼而非一般体育活动。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta neurologica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s13760-024-02677-9
Tugce Bozkurt, Merve Unal, Yeliz Salci
{"title":"影响多发性硬化症患者坚持体育锻炼的因素:一项系统综述,重点关注体育锻炼而非一般体育活动。","authors":"Tugce Bozkurt, Merve Unal, Yeliz Salci","doi":"10.1007/s13760-024-02677-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the barriers and facilitators of physical activity adherence are well-defined, there is a limited number of studies focusing specifically on exercise adherence, which is crucial to identify in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) due to its known disease-modifying effect.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the factors affecting adherence to physical exercise in MS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases up to the current date. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quantitative studies and the McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool for qualitative studies, with evidence synthesis conducted using the Modified Bakker Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review incorporated thirteen studies, consisting of seven qualitative and six quantitative ones. These studies' methodological quality was high; 12 were high, and the other was medium (unclear). In all reviewed studies, the primary patient-related and environmental barriers with high levels of evidence regarding exercise adherence included fatigue (38%), false beliefs (18%), cost (18%), and lack of time (15%). Barriers identified in very few studies included cognitive problems (3%), bladder-bowel problems (3%), and family support and advice (3%), indicating a necessity for further research to reveal their impact on exercise adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scarcity of studies on exercise barriers in MS is partly due to the absence of reliable assessment methods for evaluating exercise adherence, along with the prevalent emphasis on physical activity. Future research should prioritize the development of adherence scales tailored to physical exercise and shifting focus towards less explored barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing adherence to Physical Exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review focusing on Exercise over General Physical Activity.\",\"authors\":\"Tugce Bozkurt, Merve Unal, Yeliz Salci\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13760-024-02677-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the barriers and facilitators of physical activity adherence are well-defined, there is a limited number of studies focusing specifically on exercise adherence, which is crucial to identify in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) due to its known disease-modifying effect.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the factors affecting adherence to physical exercise in MS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases up to the current date. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quantitative studies and the McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool for qualitative studies, with evidence synthesis conducted using the Modified Bakker Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review incorporated thirteen studies, consisting of seven qualitative and six quantitative ones. These studies' methodological quality was high; 12 were high, and the other was medium (unclear). In all reviewed studies, the primary patient-related and environmental barriers with high levels of evidence regarding exercise adherence included fatigue (38%), false beliefs (18%), cost (18%), and lack of time (15%). Barriers identified in very few studies included cognitive problems (3%), bladder-bowel problems (3%), and family support and advice (3%), indicating a necessity for further research to reveal their impact on exercise adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scarcity of studies on exercise barriers in MS is partly due to the absence of reliable assessment methods for evaluating exercise adherence, along with the prevalent emphasis on physical activity. Future research should prioritize the development of adherence scales tailored to physical exercise and shifting focus towards less explored barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-024-02677-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-024-02677-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然坚持体育锻炼的障碍和促进因素已得到明确界定,但专门针对坚持体育锻炼的研究数量有限,而多发性硬化症(MS)患者坚持体育锻炼至关重要,因为众所周知,体育锻炼具有改变疾病的作用:调查影响多发性硬化症患者坚持体育锻炼的因素:方法:在 PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science 和 Scopus 电子数据库中进行文献检索。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估定量研究的方法学质量,采用麦克马斯特批判性评估工具评估定性研究的方法学质量,并采用修正的巴克量表进行证据综合:系统综述共纳入 13 项研究,包括 7 项定性研究和 6 项定量研究。这些研究的方法学质量为高;12 项为高,另一项为中等(不清楚)。在所有综述研究中,与患者有关的主要障碍和环境障碍中,与坚持锻炼有关的高水平证据包括疲劳(38%)、错误信念(18%)、费用(18%)和缺乏时间(15%)。在极少数研究中发现的障碍包括认知问题(3%)、膀胱-肠道问题(3%)以及家庭支持和建议(3%),这表明有必要开展进一步研究,以揭示这些障碍对坚持锻炼的影响:结论:关于多发性硬化症患者运动障碍的研究很少,部分原因是缺乏可靠的评估方法来评价运动依从性,以及普遍强调体育锻炼。未来的研究应优先开发针对体育锻炼的运动依从性量表,并将重点转移到探索较少的障碍上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors influencing adherence to Physical Exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review focusing on Exercise over General Physical Activity.

Background: While the barriers and facilitators of physical activity adherence are well-defined, there is a limited number of studies focusing specifically on exercise adherence, which is crucial to identify in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) due to its known disease-modifying effect.

Objective: To investigate the factors affecting adherence to physical exercise in MS patients.

Methods: Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases up to the current date. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quantitative studies and the McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool for qualitative studies, with evidence synthesis conducted using the Modified Bakker Scale.

Results: The systematic review incorporated thirteen studies, consisting of seven qualitative and six quantitative ones. These studies' methodological quality was high; 12 were high, and the other was medium (unclear). In all reviewed studies, the primary patient-related and environmental barriers with high levels of evidence regarding exercise adherence included fatigue (38%), false beliefs (18%), cost (18%), and lack of time (15%). Barriers identified in very few studies included cognitive problems (3%), bladder-bowel problems (3%), and family support and advice (3%), indicating a necessity for further research to reveal their impact on exercise adherence.

Conclusion: The scarcity of studies on exercise barriers in MS is partly due to the absence of reliable assessment methods for evaluating exercise adherence, along with the prevalent emphasis on physical activity. Future research should prioritize the development of adherence scales tailored to physical exercise and shifting focus towards less explored barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
期刊最新文献
Expanding the phenotyping spectrum of Witteveen Kolk syndrome: first report of generalized dystonia and cerebellar ataxia. Risk of stroke after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting of the Genetic Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease consortium. Two remarkable cases of haploinsufficiency found in the DYRK1A gene. Letter to the editor regarding "Postoperative elevated bed header position versus supine in the management of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis" by Ibrahim Serag et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1