Bettina Wollesen, Julia Gräf, Sander De Bock, Eligia Alfio, María Alejandra Díaz, Kevin De Pauw
{"title":"使用外骨骼完成高空钻孔任务的性别差异--一项横断面研究","authors":"Bettina Wollesen, Julia Gräf, Sander De Bock, Eligia Alfio, María Alejandra Díaz, Kevin De Pauw","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics9100601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Exoskeletons offer potential benefits for overhead working tasks, but gender effects or differences are unclear. This study aimed to compare the performance as well as subjective body strain and comfort of men and women using an upper-body exoskeleton. (2) n = 20 female and n = 16 male participants performed an overhead drilling task with and without a passive upper-body exoskeleton in a randomized cross-over study. The task performance of different movement phases, perceived exertion, and ease of use were measured to compare gender differences. One- and two-way analyses were used to compare genders in the different conditions. The body mass index (BMI) was included as a covariate. (3) Gender differences in task performance were found for error integrals (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with higher values in male participants. Moreover, there was a significant interaction effect for gender x exoskeleton use. While females showed performance decrements in aiming with exoskeleton use, the males' performance increased (<i>p</i> = 0.025). No other gender differences were observed. (4) Gender differences in task performance using an upper-body industrial exoskeleton were less detectable than expected, indicating that body composition and anthropometrics might be valuable indicators for performance including assisting devices. Moreover, future studies should also integrate the examination of muscle activity to gain more insights into potential gender movement control patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Performing an Overhead Drilling Task Using an Exoskeleton-A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bettina Wollesen, Julia Gräf, Sander De Bock, Eligia Alfio, María Alejandra Díaz, Kevin De Pauw\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biomimetics9100601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>(1) Exoskeletons offer potential benefits for overhead working tasks, but gender effects or differences are unclear. This study aimed to compare the performance as well as subjective body strain and comfort of men and women using an upper-body exoskeleton. (2) n = 20 female and n = 16 male participants performed an overhead drilling task with and without a passive upper-body exoskeleton in a randomized cross-over study. The task performance of different movement phases, perceived exertion, and ease of use were measured to compare gender differences. One- and two-way analyses were used to compare genders in the different conditions. The body mass index (BMI) was included as a covariate. (3) Gender differences in task performance were found for error integrals (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with higher values in male participants. Moreover, there was a significant interaction effect for gender x exoskeleton use. While females showed performance decrements in aiming with exoskeleton use, the males' performance increased (<i>p</i> = 0.025). No other gender differences were observed. (4) Gender differences in task performance using an upper-body industrial exoskeleton were less detectable than expected, indicating that body composition and anthropometrics might be valuable indicators for performance including assisting devices. Moreover, future studies should also integrate the examination of muscle activity to gain more insights into potential gender movement control patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomimetics\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomimetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9100601\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9100601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
(1) 外骨骼为高空作业任务提供了潜在的益处,但性别影响或性别差异尚不明确。本研究旨在比较使用上半身外骨骼的男性和女性的表现以及主观身体应变和舒适度。(2) 在一项随机交叉研究中,n = 20 名女性和 n = 16 名男性参与者分别在使用和不使用被动式上半身外骨骼的情况下完成了一项高空钻孔任务。研究人员测量了不同运动阶段的任务表现、感知消耗量和易用性,以比较性别差异。采用单因素和双因素分析来比较不同条件下的性别差异。体重指数(BMI)被列为协变量。(3) 在误差积分方面发现了任务表现的性别差异(p < 0.001),男性参与者的误差积分值更高。此外,性别 x 使用外骨骼存在明显的交互效应。在使用外骨骼的情况下,女性的成绩有所下降,而男性的成绩则有所上升(p = 0.025)。没有观察到其他性别差异。(4) 使用上半身工业外骨骼在任务表现上的性别差异比预期的要小,这表明身体成分和人体测量学可能是辅助设备表现的重要指标。此外,未来的研究还应结合对肌肉活动的检查,以便更深入地了解潜在的性别运动控制模式。
Gender Differences in Performing an Overhead Drilling Task Using an Exoskeleton-A Cross-Sectional Study.
(1) Exoskeletons offer potential benefits for overhead working tasks, but gender effects or differences are unclear. This study aimed to compare the performance as well as subjective body strain and comfort of men and women using an upper-body exoskeleton. (2) n = 20 female and n = 16 male participants performed an overhead drilling task with and without a passive upper-body exoskeleton in a randomized cross-over study. The task performance of different movement phases, perceived exertion, and ease of use were measured to compare gender differences. One- and two-way analyses were used to compare genders in the different conditions. The body mass index (BMI) was included as a covariate. (3) Gender differences in task performance were found for error integrals (p < 0.001) with higher values in male participants. Moreover, there was a significant interaction effect for gender x exoskeleton use. While females showed performance decrements in aiming with exoskeleton use, the males' performance increased (p = 0.025). No other gender differences were observed. (4) Gender differences in task performance using an upper-body industrial exoskeleton were less detectable than expected, indicating that body composition and anthropometrics might be valuable indicators for performance including assisting devices. Moreover, future studies should also integrate the examination of muscle activity to gain more insights into potential gender movement control patterns.