使用外骨骼完成高空钻孔任务的性别差异--一项横断面研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Biomimetics Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.3390/biomimetics9100601
Bettina Wollesen, Julia Gräf, Sander De Bock, Eligia Alfio, María Alejandra Díaz, Kevin De Pauw
{"title":"使用外骨骼完成高空钻孔任务的性别差异--一项横断面研究","authors":"Bettina Wollesen, Julia Gräf, Sander De Bock, Eligia Alfio, María Alejandra Díaz, Kevin De Pauw","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics9100601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Exoskeletons offer potential benefits for overhead working tasks, but gender effects or differences are unclear. This study aimed to compare the performance as well as subjective body strain and comfort of men and women using an upper-body exoskeleton. (2) n = 20 female and n = 16 male participants performed an overhead drilling task with and without a passive upper-body exoskeleton in a randomized cross-over study. The task performance of different movement phases, perceived exertion, and ease of use were measured to compare gender differences. One- and two-way analyses were used to compare genders in the different conditions. The body mass index (BMI) was included as a covariate. (3) Gender differences in task performance were found for error integrals (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with higher values in male participants. Moreover, there was a significant interaction effect for gender x exoskeleton use. While females showed performance decrements in aiming with exoskeleton use, the males' performance increased (<i>p</i> = 0.025). No other gender differences were observed. (4) Gender differences in task performance using an upper-body industrial exoskeleton were less detectable than expected, indicating that body composition and anthropometrics might be valuable indicators for performance including assisting devices. Moreover, future studies should also integrate the examination of muscle activity to gain more insights into potential gender movement control patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Performing an Overhead Drilling Task Using an Exoskeleton-A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bettina Wollesen, Julia Gräf, Sander De Bock, Eligia Alfio, María Alejandra Díaz, Kevin De Pauw\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biomimetics9100601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>(1) Exoskeletons offer potential benefits for overhead working tasks, but gender effects or differences are unclear. This study aimed to compare the performance as well as subjective body strain and comfort of men and women using an upper-body exoskeleton. (2) n = 20 female and n = 16 male participants performed an overhead drilling task with and without a passive upper-body exoskeleton in a randomized cross-over study. The task performance of different movement phases, perceived exertion, and ease of use were measured to compare gender differences. One- and two-way analyses were used to compare genders in the different conditions. The body mass index (BMI) was included as a covariate. (3) Gender differences in task performance were found for error integrals (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with higher values in male participants. Moreover, there was a significant interaction effect for gender x exoskeleton use. While females showed performance decrements in aiming with exoskeleton use, the males' performance increased (<i>p</i> = 0.025). No other gender differences were observed. (4) Gender differences in task performance using an upper-body industrial exoskeleton were less detectable than expected, indicating that body composition and anthropometrics might be valuable indicators for performance including assisting devices. Moreover, future studies should also integrate the examination of muscle activity to gain more insights into potential gender movement control patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomimetics\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomimetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9100601\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9100601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(1) 外骨骼为高空作业任务提供了潜在的益处,但性别影响或性别差异尚不明确。本研究旨在比较使用上半身外骨骼的男性和女性的表现以及主观身体应变和舒适度。(2) 在一项随机交叉研究中,n = 20 名女性和 n = 16 名男性参与者分别在使用和不使用被动式上半身外骨骼的情况下完成了一项高空钻孔任务。研究人员测量了不同运动阶段的任务表现、感知消耗量和易用性,以比较性别差异。采用单因素和双因素分析来比较不同条件下的性别差异。体重指数(BMI)被列为协变量。(3) 在误差积分方面发现了任务表现的性别差异(p < 0.001),男性参与者的误差积分值更高。此外,性别 x 使用外骨骼存在明显的交互效应。在使用外骨骼的情况下,女性的成绩有所下降,而男性的成绩则有所上升(p = 0.025)。没有观察到其他性别差异。(4) 使用上半身工业外骨骼在任务表现上的性别差异比预期的要小,这表明身体成分和人体测量学可能是辅助设备表现的重要指标。此外,未来的研究还应结合对肌肉活动的检查,以便更深入地了解潜在的性别运动控制模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender Differences in Performing an Overhead Drilling Task Using an Exoskeleton-A Cross-Sectional Study.

(1) Exoskeletons offer potential benefits for overhead working tasks, but gender effects or differences are unclear. This study aimed to compare the performance as well as subjective body strain and comfort of men and women using an upper-body exoskeleton. (2) n = 20 female and n = 16 male participants performed an overhead drilling task with and without a passive upper-body exoskeleton in a randomized cross-over study. The task performance of different movement phases, perceived exertion, and ease of use were measured to compare gender differences. One- and two-way analyses were used to compare genders in the different conditions. The body mass index (BMI) was included as a covariate. (3) Gender differences in task performance were found for error integrals (p < 0.001) with higher values in male participants. Moreover, there was a significant interaction effect for gender x exoskeleton use. While females showed performance decrements in aiming with exoskeleton use, the males' performance increased (p = 0.025). No other gender differences were observed. (4) Gender differences in task performance using an upper-body industrial exoskeleton were less detectable than expected, indicating that body composition and anthropometrics might be valuable indicators for performance including assisting devices. Moreover, future studies should also integrate the examination of muscle activity to gain more insights into potential gender movement control patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomimetics
Biomimetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Brain-Inspired Architecture for Spiking Neural Networks. Explorative Binary Gray Wolf Optimizer with Quadratic Interpolation for Feature Selection. Path Planning of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on a Multi-Strategy Improved Pelican Optimization Algorithm. Performance Comparison of Bio-Inspired Algorithms for Optimizing an ANN-Based MPPT Forecast for PV Systems. Clinical Applications of Micro/Nanobubble Technology in Neurological Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1