探索听觉显著性的性别差异:声学特征在自下而上注意力中的作用。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES BMC Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1186/s12868-024-00909-5
Naoya Obama, Yoshiki Sato, Narihiro Kodama, Yuhei Kodani, Katsuya Nakamura, Ayaka Yokozeki, Shinsuke Nagami
{"title":"探索听觉显著性的性别差异:声学特征在自下而上注意力中的作用。","authors":"Naoya Obama, Yoshiki Sato, Narihiro Kodama, Yuhei Kodani, Katsuya Nakamura, Ayaka Yokozeki, Shinsuke Nagami","doi":"10.1186/s12868-024-00909-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several cognitive functions are related to sex. However, the relationship between auditory attention and sex remains unclear. The present study aimed to explore sex differences in auditory saliency judgments, with a particular focus on bottom-up type auditory attention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five typical adults (mean age: 21.5 ± 0.64 years) with no known hearing deficits, intelligence abnormalities, or attention deficits were enrolled in this study. They were tasked with annotating attention capturing sounds from five audio clips played in a soundproof room. Each stimulus contained ten salient sounds randomly placed within a 1-min natural soundscape. We conducted a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis using the number of responses to salient sounds as the dependent variable, sex as the between-subjects factor, duration, maximum loudness, and maximum spectrum of each sound as the within-subjects factor, and each sound event and participant as the variable effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between male and female groups in age, hearing threshold, intellectual function, and attention function (all p > 0.05). Analysis confirmed 77 distinct sound events, with individual response rates of 4.0-100%. In a GLMM analysis, the main effect of sex was not statistically significant (p = 0.458). Duration and spectrum had a significant effect on response rate (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001). The effect of loudness was not statistically significant (p = 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that male and female listeners do not differ significantly in their auditory saliency judgments based on the acoustic characteristics studied. This finding challenges the notion of inherent sex differences in bottom-up auditory attention and highlights the need for further research to explore other potential factors or conditions under which such differences might emerge.</p>","PeriodicalId":9031,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring sex differences in auditory saliency: the role of acoustic characteristics in bottom-up attention.\",\"authors\":\"Naoya Obama, Yoshiki Sato, Narihiro Kodama, Yuhei Kodani, Katsuya Nakamura, Ayaka Yokozeki, Shinsuke Nagami\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12868-024-00909-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several cognitive functions are related to sex. However, the relationship between auditory attention and sex remains unclear. The present study aimed to explore sex differences in auditory saliency judgments, with a particular focus on bottom-up type auditory attention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five typical adults (mean age: 21.5 ± 0.64 years) with no known hearing deficits, intelligence abnormalities, or attention deficits were enrolled in this study. They were tasked with annotating attention capturing sounds from five audio clips played in a soundproof room. Each stimulus contained ten salient sounds randomly placed within a 1-min natural soundscape. We conducted a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis using the number of responses to salient sounds as the dependent variable, sex as the between-subjects factor, duration, maximum loudness, and maximum spectrum of each sound as the within-subjects factor, and each sound event and participant as the variable effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between male and female groups in age, hearing threshold, intellectual function, and attention function (all p > 0.05). Analysis confirmed 77 distinct sound events, with individual response rates of 4.0-100%. In a GLMM analysis, the main effect of sex was not statistically significant (p = 0.458). Duration and spectrum had a significant effect on response rate (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001). The effect of loudness was not statistically significant (p = 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that male and female listeners do not differ significantly in their auditory saliency judgments based on the acoustic characteristics studied. This finding challenges the notion of inherent sex differences in bottom-up auditory attention and highlights the need for further research to explore other potential factors or conditions under which such differences might emerge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-024-00909-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-024-00909-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景有几种认知功能与性别有关。然而,听觉注意与性别之间的关系仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨听觉显著性判断的性别差异,尤其关注自下而上类型的听觉注意:本研究招募了 45 名典型成年人(平均年龄:21.5 ± 0.64 岁),他们没有已知的听力障碍、智力异常或注意力缺陷。他们的任务是从隔音室中播放的五个音频片段中捕捉声音并进行注释。每个刺激包含 10 个突出的声音,随机放置在 1 分钟的自然音景中。我们采用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)进行分析,将对突出声音的反应次数作为因变量,性别作为被试间因素,每种声音的持续时间、最大响度和最大频谱作为被试内因素,每个声音事件和参与者作为变量效应:男女组在年龄、听阈、智力功能和注意力功能方面均无明显差异(P>0.05)。分析确认了 77 个不同的声音事件,个体反应率为 4.0%-100%。在 GLMM 分析中,性别的主效应无统计学意义(p = 0.458)。持续时间和频谱对响应率有明显影响(p = 0.006 和 p 结论:性别对响应率的影响不明显:研究结果表明,基于所研究的声学特征,男性和女性听者在听觉突出度判断上没有明显差异。这一发现对自下而上的听觉注意中固有的性别差异这一概念提出了质疑,并强调了进一步研究探索可能出现这种差异的其他潜在因素或条件的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring sex differences in auditory saliency: the role of acoustic characteristics in bottom-up attention.

Background: Several cognitive functions are related to sex. However, the relationship between auditory attention and sex remains unclear. The present study aimed to explore sex differences in auditory saliency judgments, with a particular focus on bottom-up type auditory attention.

Methods: Forty-five typical adults (mean age: 21.5 ± 0.64 years) with no known hearing deficits, intelligence abnormalities, or attention deficits were enrolled in this study. They were tasked with annotating attention capturing sounds from five audio clips played in a soundproof room. Each stimulus contained ten salient sounds randomly placed within a 1-min natural soundscape. We conducted a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis using the number of responses to salient sounds as the dependent variable, sex as the between-subjects factor, duration, maximum loudness, and maximum spectrum of each sound as the within-subjects factor, and each sound event and participant as the variable effect.

Results: No significant differences were found between male and female groups in age, hearing threshold, intellectual function, and attention function (all p > 0.05). Analysis confirmed 77 distinct sound events, with individual response rates of 4.0-100%. In a GLMM analysis, the main effect of sex was not statistically significant (p = 0.458). Duration and spectrum had a significant effect on response rate (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001). The effect of loudness was not statistically significant (p = 0.13).

Conclusions: The results suggest that male and female listeners do not differ significantly in their auditory saliency judgments based on the acoustic characteristics studied. This finding challenges the notion of inherent sex differences in bottom-up auditory attention and highlights the need for further research to explore other potential factors or conditions under which such differences might emerge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neuroscience
BMC Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
16 months
期刊介绍: BMC Neuroscience is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of neuroscience, welcoming studies that provide insight into the molecular, cellular, developmental, genetic and genomic, systems, network, cognitive and behavioral aspects of nervous system function in both health and disease. Both experimental and theoretical studies are within scope, as are studies that describe methodological approaches to monitoring or manipulating nervous system function.
期刊最新文献
Effect and mechanism of Tetramethylpyrazine in repair of sciatic nerve injury in rats. Retraction Note: 27-Hydroxycholesterol increases α-synuclein protein levels through proteasomal inhibition in human dopaminergic neurons. Mobile brain imaging in butoh dancers: from rehearsals to public performance. Tapping into the vocal learning and rhythmic synchronization hypothesis. The cognitive neuroscience and neurocognitive rehabilitation of dance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1