Radiographic Indicators of Craniocervical Instability: Analyzing Variance of Normative Supine and Upright Imaging in a Healthy Population.

Study design: Single-institution retrospective review.

Objective: To establish baseline ranges and variability of 7 radiographic measurements of the cervical spine in a healthy patient population as potential diagnostic tools for craniocervical instability.

Summary of background data: Craniocervical instability, common in patients with connective tissue disease such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, often presents with a wide range of symptoms, including neck pain. Current diagnostic methods employ a range of clinical and radiographic features, but diagnostic challenges remain due to missed indications on static imaging and a lack of standardized measurement values and normalized variance.

Methods: Seventy-two healthy patients with cervical imaging were analyzed. Surgimap software was used to annotate supine computed tomography images, flexion, extension, and neutral x-ray images for measurement. These measurements included the atlanto-dental interval, clival-axial angle, basion-dens interval, basion-axis interval, perpendicular basion to the inferior aspect of C2, also known as Grabb Oakes measurement, and the hard palate to C1 and hard palate to C2. Statistical analysis assessed differences among imaging modalities, and coefficients of variation were calculated for each measurement.

Results: Our cohort consisted of a total of 72 patients with a mean age of 64 (SD: 13.54). All measurements except for the basion-axial interval and atlanto-dental interval demonstrated a significant difference between extension and flexion x-ray measurements. clivo-axial angle, hard palate to C1, and hard palate to C2 demonstrated the lowest coefficients of variance across imaging modalities.

Conclusion: Understanding normal variance in cervical measurements is invaluable for accurate CCI diagnosis. Using a cohort of healthy patients, this study delineates the distribution and spread of 7 cervical measurements, delineating reference values and variability in these key measurements and highlighting their potential for use as imaging markers for CCI.

Level of evidence: Level III.