微波消融联合手术在治疗多发性高危肺结节中的作用。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.013
Y Chen, J Li, S Ma, Z Zhang, C Li, F Kong
{"title":"微波消融联合手术在治疗多发性高危肺结节中的作用。","authors":"Y Chen, J Li, S Ma, Z Zhang, C Li, F Kong","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and safety of surgical resection combined with microwave ablation (MWA) for patients with multiple high-risk pulmonary nodules.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From September 2010 to November 2023, a total of 166 early multiple high-risk pulmonary nodule patients in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-three patients who underwent surgical resection in combination with MWA were considered as the observation group, and 113 patients who underwent two operations or one operation to remove nodules in two lobes of the lungs were considered as the control group. The primary endpoint was postoperative progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were lung function, postoperative complications, and length and cost of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the observation group, the median PFS was 37 months (1-63 months), 9 patients (16.98%) had postoperative recurrence, and the 1-year and 3-year PFS rates were 97.6% and 89.0%, respectively. In the control group, the median PFS was 36 months (1-56 months), 10 patients (8.84%) had postoperative recurrence, and the 1-year and 3-year PFS rates were 99% and 97.8%, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.392). Lung function measurements showed a decrease in patients after surgery (P<0.05), and no significant change in patients after MWA (P > 0.05). Compared with two surgical resections, the combined treatment required less hospitalization and cost (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with multiple high-risk pulmonary nodules, surgical resection in combination with microwave ablation is an effective and safe treatment, which has less hospitalization and cost than using surgical resection alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of microwave ablation in combination with surgery in the management of multiple high-risk pulmonary nodules.\",\"authors\":\"Y Chen, J Li, S Ma, Z Zhang, C Li, F Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and safety of surgical resection combined with microwave ablation (MWA) for patients with multiple high-risk pulmonary nodules.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From September 2010 to November 2023, a total of 166 early multiple high-risk pulmonary nodule patients in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-three patients who underwent surgical resection in combination with MWA were considered as the observation group, and 113 patients who underwent two operations or one operation to remove nodules in two lobes of the lungs were considered as the control group. The primary endpoint was postoperative progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were lung function, postoperative complications, and length and cost of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the observation group, the median PFS was 37 months (1-63 months), 9 patients (16.98%) had postoperative recurrence, and the 1-year and 3-year PFS rates were 97.6% and 89.0%, respectively. In the control group, the median PFS was 36 months (1-56 months), 10 patients (8.84%) had postoperative recurrence, and the 1-year and 3-year PFS rates were 99% and 97.8%, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.392). Lung function measurements showed a decrease in patients after surgery (P<0.05), and no significant change in patients after MWA (P > 0.05). Compared with two surgical resections, the combined treatment required less hospitalization and cost (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with multiple high-risk pulmonary nodules, surgical resection in combination with microwave ablation is an effective and safe treatment, which has less hospitalization and cost than using surgical resection alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估手术切除联合微波消融(MWA)治疗多发性高危肺结节患者的可行性和安全性:回顾性分析我院自 2010 年 9 月至 2023 年 11 月共 166 例早期多发性高危肺结节患者。53例接受手术切除联合MWA的患者被视为观察组,113例接受两次手术或一次手术切除肺两叶结节的患者被视为对照组。主要终点是术后无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点为肺功能、术后并发症、住院时间和费用:观察组的中位无进展生存期为 37 个月(1-63 个月),9 名患者(16.98%)术后复发,1 年和 3 年的无进展生存率分别为 97.6% 和 89.0%。对照组的中位生存期为 36 个月(1-56 个月),10 名患者(8.84%)术后复发,1 年和 3 年的生存率分别为 99% 和 97.8%。两组之间的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.392)。肺功能测量结果显示,术后患者的肺功能有所下降(P 0.05)。与两次手术切除相比,联合治疗所需的住院时间和费用更少(P < 0.05):结论:对于多发性高危肺结节患者,手术切除联合微波消融是一种有效、安全的治疗方法,与单纯手术切除相比,住院时间和费用更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of microwave ablation in combination with surgery in the management of multiple high-risk pulmonary nodules.

Aim: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of surgical resection combined with microwave ablation (MWA) for patients with multiple high-risk pulmonary nodules.

Materials and methods: From September 2010 to November 2023, a total of 166 early multiple high-risk pulmonary nodule patients in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-three patients who underwent surgical resection in combination with MWA were considered as the observation group, and 113 patients who underwent two operations or one operation to remove nodules in two lobes of the lungs were considered as the control group. The primary endpoint was postoperative progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were lung function, postoperative complications, and length and cost of hospitalization.

Results: In the observation group, the median PFS was 37 months (1-63 months), 9 patients (16.98%) had postoperative recurrence, and the 1-year and 3-year PFS rates were 97.6% and 89.0%, respectively. In the control group, the median PFS was 36 months (1-56 months), 10 patients (8.84%) had postoperative recurrence, and the 1-year and 3-year PFS rates were 99% and 97.8%, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.392). Lung function measurements showed a decrease in patients after surgery (P<0.05), and no significant change in patients after MWA (P > 0.05). Compared with two surgical resections, the combined treatment required less hospitalization and cost (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: For patients with multiple high-risk pulmonary nodules, surgical resection in combination with microwave ablation is an effective and safe treatment, which has less hospitalization and cost than using surgical resection alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "CT histogram analysis to distinguish between acute intracerebral hemorrhage and cavernous hemangioma" [Clin Radiol 79 (11) (2024) e872-e879]. Re: Utility of zero echo time (ZTE) sequence for assessing bony lesions of skull base and calvarium. Measurement of lumbar vertebral body attenuation at PET-CT is a reliable method of diagnosing osteoporosis Safety of CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation in patients treated for clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma with the need for pre-procedural ureteral stenting: an international cohort study Correlation of semi-quantitative analyses and visual scores in pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging with pulmonary function test parameters in patients with interstitial lung diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1