现实生活中的 STRIDE-II 临床方法:分析和实用建议。

IF 1.8 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Crohn's & Colitis 360 Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/crocol/otae055
Elena Ricart, Guillermo Bastida, Daniel Carpio, Daniel Ceballos, Daniel Ginard, Ignacio Marín-Jimenéz, Luis Menchén, Fernando Muñoz, Yago González-Lama
{"title":"现实生活中的 STRIDE-II 临床方法:分析和实用建议。","authors":"Elena Ricart, Guillermo Bastida, Daniel Carpio, Daniel Ceballos, Daniel Ginard, Ignacio Marín-Jimenéz, Luis Menchén, Fernando Muñoz, Yago González-Lama","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otae055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to (1) analyze the applicability of the updated Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE-II) recommendations in real-world clinical practice, (2) identify barriers to their implementation, and (3) propose practical measures to overcome these obstacles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was based on a survey, a literature review, and expert opinions. Nine inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experts identified 7 areas likely to be controversial or potential implementation barriers in daily clinical practice: endoscopy, histology, ultrasound, quality of life, biomarkers, symptom control, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Based on this, a survey was carried out among educational course participants. The experts discussed the literature review and survey results and proposed several statements and practical actions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 gastroenterologists answered the survey. The reported difficulty level in reaching STRIDE-II treatment goals in clinical practice was high. Only 22% of participants performed clinical remission assessments using clinical indexes and PROs. Seventy percent of responders did not use fecal calprotectin cutoffs and considered changes from the previous levels instead. Mucosal healing as a long-term therapeutic goal was considered necessary to be individualized in specific patient subgroups (eg, elderly/fragile patients, multiple treatment failures, and last-line therapies). Other barriers, like the lack of access to imaging techniques or insufficient knowledge and skills among healthcare professionals, were detected. The experts suggested adding less stringent treatment goals and measurements, patient stratification, local adaptations, educational activities, and research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STRIDE-II recommendations face various implementation barriers needing careful evaluation in order to enhance their adoption in clinical practice, and ultimately improve outcomes in IBD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"6 4","pages":"otae055"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Approach to STRIDE-II in Real-Life Settings: Analysis and Practical Recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Elena Ricart, Guillermo Bastida, Daniel Carpio, Daniel Ceballos, Daniel Ginard, Ignacio Marín-Jimenéz, Luis Menchén, Fernando Muñoz, Yago González-Lama\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otae055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to (1) analyze the applicability of the updated Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE-II) recommendations in real-world clinical practice, (2) identify barriers to their implementation, and (3) propose practical measures to overcome these obstacles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was based on a survey, a literature review, and expert opinions. Nine inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experts identified 7 areas likely to be controversial or potential implementation barriers in daily clinical practice: endoscopy, histology, ultrasound, quality of life, biomarkers, symptom control, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Based on this, a survey was carried out among educational course participants. The experts discussed the literature review and survey results and proposed several statements and practical actions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 gastroenterologists answered the survey. The reported difficulty level in reaching STRIDE-II treatment goals in clinical practice was high. Only 22% of participants performed clinical remission assessments using clinical indexes and PROs. Seventy percent of responders did not use fecal calprotectin cutoffs and considered changes from the previous levels instead. Mucosal healing as a long-term therapeutic goal was considered necessary to be individualized in specific patient subgroups (eg, elderly/fragile patients, multiple treatment failures, and last-line therapies). Other barriers, like the lack of access to imaging techniques or insufficient knowledge and skills among healthcare professionals, were detected. The experts suggested adding less stringent treatment goals and measurements, patient stratification, local adaptations, educational activities, and research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STRIDE-II recommendations face various implementation barriers needing careful evaluation in order to enhance their adoption in clinical practice, and ultimately improve outcomes in IBD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"otae055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们的目的是:(1) 分析最新的《炎症性肠病治疗靶点选择》(STRIDE-II)建议在实际临床实践中的适用性;(2) 找出实施这些建议的障碍;(3) 提出克服这些障碍的切实可行的措施:这项定性研究以调查、文献综述和专家意见为基础。九位炎症性肠病(IBD)专家确定了日常临床实践中可能存在争议或潜在实施障碍的七个领域:内窥镜检查、组织学、超声波、生活质量、生物标记物、症状控制和患者报告结果(PROs)。在此基础上,对培训班学员进行了调查。专家们讨论了文献综述和调查结果,并提出了若干声明和实际行动:共有 55 名肠胃病学专家回答了调查。据报告,在临床实践中实现 STRIDE-II 治疗目标的难度很大。只有 22% 的参与者使用临床指标和 PROs 进行了临床缓解评估。70%的受访者没有使用粪便热保护蛋白临界值,而是考虑了与之前水平相比的变化。将黏膜愈合作为长期治疗目标被认为有必要针对特定患者亚群(如老年/脆弱患者、多次治疗失败者和最后一线治疗者)进行个体化治疗。专家们还发现了其他一些障碍,如缺乏成像技术或医护人员的知识和技能不足。专家们建议增加不那么严格的治疗目标和测量方法、患者分层、地方适应性、教育活动和研究:STRIDE-II建议面临各种实施障碍,需要仔细评估,以便在临床实践中更好地采用这些建议,最终改善IBD患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Approach to STRIDE-II in Real-Life Settings: Analysis and Practical Recommendations.

Background: We aimed to (1) analyze the applicability of the updated Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE-II) recommendations in real-world clinical practice, (2) identify barriers to their implementation, and (3) propose practical measures to overcome these obstacles.

Methods: This qualitative study was based on a survey, a literature review, and expert opinions. Nine inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experts identified 7 areas likely to be controversial or potential implementation barriers in daily clinical practice: endoscopy, histology, ultrasound, quality of life, biomarkers, symptom control, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Based on this, a survey was carried out among educational course participants. The experts discussed the literature review and survey results and proposed several statements and practical actions.

Results: A total of 55 gastroenterologists answered the survey. The reported difficulty level in reaching STRIDE-II treatment goals in clinical practice was high. Only 22% of participants performed clinical remission assessments using clinical indexes and PROs. Seventy percent of responders did not use fecal calprotectin cutoffs and considered changes from the previous levels instead. Mucosal healing as a long-term therapeutic goal was considered necessary to be individualized in specific patient subgroups (eg, elderly/fragile patients, multiple treatment failures, and last-line therapies). Other barriers, like the lack of access to imaging techniques or insufficient knowledge and skills among healthcare professionals, were detected. The experts suggested adding less stringent treatment goals and measurements, patient stratification, local adaptations, educational activities, and research.

Conclusions: STRIDE-II recommendations face various implementation barriers needing careful evaluation in order to enhance their adoption in clinical practice, and ultimately improve outcomes in IBD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crohn's & Colitis 360
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Upadacitinib in Patients With Difficult-to-Treat Crohn's Disease. Real-World Experience of the Association of HLADQA1*05 Allele With Loss of Response to Anti-TNF Inhibitors. Real-World Treatment Outcomes Associated With Early Versus Delayed Vedolizumab Initiation in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Like a Punch in the Gut: A Novel Perspective On Annual Recurrences of Ulcerative Colitis. Interventions for Adjunctive Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Permanent Ileostomy: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1