胰腺脂肪变性是ERCP术后胰腺炎的一个重要风险因素:一个新概念。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive and Liver Disease Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2024.10.005
Caroline Prouvot, Myriam Boumaiza, Khawla Maoui, Anne Sophie Peaucelle, Soiwafi Mohamed, Hanae Boutallaka, Claire Boutet, Xavier Roblin, Jean-Marc Phelip, Rémi Grange, Nicolas Williet
{"title":"胰腺脂肪变性是ERCP术后胰腺炎的一个重要风险因素:一个新概念。","authors":"Caroline Prouvot, Myriam Boumaiza, Khawla Maoui, Anne Sophie Peaucelle, Soiwafi Mohamed, Hanae Boutallaka, Claire Boutet, Xavier Roblin, Jean-Marc Phelip, Rémi Grange, Nicolas Williet","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the treatment of choice for biliary obstruction but is associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in around 5 % of cases. No radiological criteria have been evaluated for predicting PEP risk.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective study examined records of 1365 patients who underwent ERCP at our center between 2014-2023. Only sphincterotomy-naïve patients were included. CT scans within 30 days of ERCP were reviewed for radiological criteria. The optimal pancreatic density cut-off was determined using AUROC and Youden index. Logistic regression was used for analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PEP occurred in 75 patients (6.1 %). The CT scan was performed before ERCP for 565 of the total population. A fatty pancreas, defined as a spontaneous density less than -50HU, was statistically associated with PEP (OR: 7.35; 95 % CI: 1.56-26.5 p = 0.004), as well as with biliary obstruction due to stones (OR: 0.61; 95 % CI: 0.38-0.98; P = 0.04), the need for precut (OR: 2.19; 95 % CI: 1.35-3.51; P = 0.001), cannulation of the main pancreatic duct (OR: 2.23; 95 % CI: 1.36-3.59; P = 0.001), and the use of a pancreatic stent (OR: 2.48; 95 % CI: 1.29-4.47; P = 0.004). In multivariate analyses, only obstruction unrelated to gallstones (OR = 2.63; 95 % CI: 1.16-6.25; P = 0.024) and a low pancreatic density (<-50HU) (OR=7.94, 95 %CI: 1.59-31.09; P = 0.005) remains significantly associated with the risk of PEP, including after adjustment for age and sex (P = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A very low pancreatic fat density could be a significant risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis with potential clinical and research implications. Further validation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pancreatic steatosis is a strong risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis: An emerging concept.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Prouvot, Myriam Boumaiza, Khawla Maoui, Anne Sophie Peaucelle, Soiwafi Mohamed, Hanae Boutallaka, Claire Boutet, Xavier Roblin, Jean-Marc Phelip, Rémi Grange, Nicolas Williet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dld.2024.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the treatment of choice for biliary obstruction but is associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in around 5 % of cases. No radiological criteria have been evaluated for predicting PEP risk.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective study examined records of 1365 patients who underwent ERCP at our center between 2014-2023. Only sphincterotomy-naïve patients were included. CT scans within 30 days of ERCP were reviewed for radiological criteria. The optimal pancreatic density cut-off was determined using AUROC and Youden index. Logistic regression was used for analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PEP occurred in 75 patients (6.1 %). The CT scan was performed before ERCP for 565 of the total population. A fatty pancreas, defined as a spontaneous density less than -50HU, was statistically associated with PEP (OR: 7.35; 95 % CI: 1.56-26.5 p = 0.004), as well as with biliary obstruction due to stones (OR: 0.61; 95 % CI: 0.38-0.98; P = 0.04), the need for precut (OR: 2.19; 95 % CI: 1.35-3.51; P = 0.001), cannulation of the main pancreatic duct (OR: 2.23; 95 % CI: 1.36-3.59; P = 0.001), and the use of a pancreatic stent (OR: 2.48; 95 % CI: 1.29-4.47; P = 0.004). In multivariate analyses, only obstruction unrelated to gallstones (OR = 2.63; 95 % CI: 1.16-6.25; P = 0.024) and a low pancreatic density (<-50HU) (OR=7.94, 95 %CI: 1.59-31.09; P = 0.005) remains significantly associated with the risk of PEP, including after adjustment for age and sex (P = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A very low pancreatic fat density could be a significant risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis with potential clinical and research implications. Further validation is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive and Liver Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive and Liver Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.10.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive and Liver Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.10.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是治疗胆道梗阻的首选方法,但约有5%的病例与ERCP术后胰腺炎(PEP)有关。目前尚未对预测 PEP 风险的放射学标准进行评估:这项回顾性研究检查了 2014-2023 年间在本中心接受 ERCP 的 1365 名患者的记录。仅纳入了括约肌切开术无效的患者。对ERCP术后30天内的CT扫描进行了放射学标准审查。使用AUROC和Youden指数确定最佳胰腺密度临界值。分析采用逻辑回归法:结果:75 名患者(6.1%)出现 PEP。所有患者中有 565 人在 ERCP 之前进行了 CT 扫描。脂肪胰腺(定义为自发密度小于 -50HU)与 PEP(OR:7.35;95 % CI:1.56-26.5;P = 0.004)以及结石导致的胆道梗阻(OR:0.61;95 % CI:0.38-0.98;P = 0.04)有统计学关联。04)、需要预先切开(OR:2.19;95 % CI:1.35-3.51;P = 0.001)、主胰管插管(OR:2.23;95 % CI:1.36-3.59;P = 0.001)和使用胰腺支架(OR:2.48;95 % CI:1.29-4.47;P = 0.004)。在多变量分析中,只有与胆结石无关的梗阻(OR = 2.63;95 % CI:1.16-6.25;P = 0.024)和胰腺脂肪密度低(结论:胰腺脂肪密度非常低会导致胆结石)才会导致胆结石:胰腺脂肪密度极低可能是ERCP术后胰腺炎的重要风险因素,具有潜在的临床和研究意义。需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pancreatic steatosis is a strong risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis: An emerging concept.

Objective: The Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the treatment of choice for biliary obstruction but is associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in around 5 % of cases. No radiological criteria have been evaluated for predicting PEP risk.

Design: This retrospective study examined records of 1365 patients who underwent ERCP at our center between 2014-2023. Only sphincterotomy-naïve patients were included. CT scans within 30 days of ERCP were reviewed for radiological criteria. The optimal pancreatic density cut-off was determined using AUROC and Youden index. Logistic regression was used for analyses.

Results: PEP occurred in 75 patients (6.1 %). The CT scan was performed before ERCP for 565 of the total population. A fatty pancreas, defined as a spontaneous density less than -50HU, was statistically associated with PEP (OR: 7.35; 95 % CI: 1.56-26.5 p = 0.004), as well as with biliary obstruction due to stones (OR: 0.61; 95 % CI: 0.38-0.98; P = 0.04), the need for precut (OR: 2.19; 95 % CI: 1.35-3.51; P = 0.001), cannulation of the main pancreatic duct (OR: 2.23; 95 % CI: 1.36-3.59; P = 0.001), and the use of a pancreatic stent (OR: 2.48; 95 % CI: 1.29-4.47; P = 0.004). In multivariate analyses, only obstruction unrelated to gallstones (OR = 2.63; 95 % CI: 1.16-6.25; P = 0.024) and a low pancreatic density (<-50HU) (OR=7.94, 95 %CI: 1.59-31.09; P = 0.005) remains significantly associated with the risk of PEP, including after adjustment for age and sex (P = 0.006).

Conclusion: A very low pancreatic fat density could be a significant risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis with potential clinical and research implications. Further validation is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive and Liver Disease
Digestive and Liver Disease 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
632
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Digestive and Liver Disease is an international journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. It is the official journal of Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF); Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP); Italian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SIED); Italian Association for Hospital Gastroenterologists and Digestive Endoscopists (AIGO); Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE); Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology (SIGENP) and Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD). Digestive and Liver Disease publishes papers on basic and clinical research in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. Contributions consist of: Original Papers Correspondence to the Editor Editorials, Reviews and Special Articles Progress Reports Image of the Month Congress Proceedings Symposia and Mini-symposia.
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in foreign body ingestion (FBI) epidemiology: A national cohort study. Duodenal gastric heterotopia diagnosed by spectral CT. Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent superficial rectal neoplastic lesions after transanal microsurgery. Liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease versus other etiologies: A meta-analysis. Sarcopenia in patients receiving TIPS is independently associated with increased risk of complications and mortality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1