Mengru Liu, Anthony Kong, Newman Lau, Zeping Feng, Xi Liu
{"title":"篮球自我评价矩阵:球员心理分析中自信心与决策表现之间的差异。","authors":"Mengru Liu, Anthony Kong, Newman Lau, Zeping Feng, Xi Liu","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1404701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In basketball training, self-evaluation plays a crucial role in the decision-making and execution of movements of players. The self-evaluation of players is influenced by their perception of own basketball ability and self-confidence state. This study aimed to explore potential discrepancies between self-confidence levels of players and their decision-making performance, while also characterizing different types of players.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data was collected from 20 youth basketball players who participated in a decision-making video task and a self-confidence assessment. Based on data from their self-confidence and decision-making awareness assessment, the K-means cluster analysis was used to categorize the players into different groups. Then, ANOVA and <i>post hoc</i> Scheffe test were conducted to compare these clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cluster analysis identified four distinct profiles of players and the results of the ANOVA and <i>post hoc</i> Scheffe tests revealed significant differences between the four clusters. The \"High Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness\" players might display an overconfident mindset, while the \"High Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness\" players potentially demonstrated the better performance and maintained a consistent and confident attitude. The \"Low Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness\" players appeared to lack confidence and needed to foster greater faith in their abilities. Finally, the \"Low Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness\" players required a long-term and comprehensive training program to improve their skills.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These preliminary findings informed the development of a self-evaluation matrix, designed to help coaches better understand player profiles and design tailored interventions. Moreover, this study contributes on sport calibration and enhances understanding of the behavioral and psychological states of players.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basketball self-evaluation matrix: discrepancy between self-confidence and decision-making performance on psychological profiling of players.\",\"authors\":\"Mengru Liu, Anthony Kong, Newman Lau, Zeping Feng, Xi Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fspor.2024.1404701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In basketball training, self-evaluation plays a crucial role in the decision-making and execution of movements of players. The self-evaluation of players is influenced by their perception of own basketball ability and self-confidence state. This study aimed to explore potential discrepancies between self-confidence levels of players and their decision-making performance, while also characterizing different types of players.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data was collected from 20 youth basketball players who participated in a decision-making video task and a self-confidence assessment. Based on data from their self-confidence and decision-making awareness assessment, the K-means cluster analysis was used to categorize the players into different groups. Then, ANOVA and <i>post hoc</i> Scheffe test were conducted to compare these clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cluster analysis identified four distinct profiles of players and the results of the ANOVA and <i>post hoc</i> Scheffe tests revealed significant differences between the four clusters. The \\\"High Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness\\\" players might display an overconfident mindset, while the \\\"High Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness\\\" players potentially demonstrated the better performance and maintained a consistent and confident attitude. The \\\"Low Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness\\\" players appeared to lack confidence and needed to foster greater faith in their abilities. Finally, the \\\"Low Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness\\\" players required a long-term and comprehensive training program to improve their skills.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These preliminary findings informed the development of a self-evaluation matrix, designed to help coaches better understand player profiles and design tailored interventions. Moreover, this study contributes on sport calibration and enhances understanding of the behavioral and psychological states of players.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1404701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1404701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Basketball self-evaluation matrix: discrepancy between self-confidence and decision-making performance on psychological profiling of players.
Background: In basketball training, self-evaluation plays a crucial role in the decision-making and execution of movements of players. The self-evaluation of players is influenced by their perception of own basketball ability and self-confidence state. This study aimed to explore potential discrepancies between self-confidence levels of players and their decision-making performance, while also characterizing different types of players.
Method: Data was collected from 20 youth basketball players who participated in a decision-making video task and a self-confidence assessment. Based on data from their self-confidence and decision-making awareness assessment, the K-means cluster analysis was used to categorize the players into different groups. Then, ANOVA and post hoc Scheffe test were conducted to compare these clusters.
Results: The cluster analysis identified four distinct profiles of players and the results of the ANOVA and post hoc Scheffe tests revealed significant differences between the four clusters. The "High Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness" players might display an overconfident mindset, while the "High Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness" players potentially demonstrated the better performance and maintained a consistent and confident attitude. The "Low Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness" players appeared to lack confidence and needed to foster greater faith in their abilities. Finally, the "Low Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness" players required a long-term and comprehensive training program to improve their skills.
Discussion: These preliminary findings informed the development of a self-evaluation matrix, designed to help coaches better understand player profiles and design tailored interventions. Moreover, this study contributes on sport calibration and enhances understanding of the behavioral and psychological states of players.