帕多瓦预测评分与无症状患者在医院获得的近端和孤立远端深静脉血栓。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Hematology Reports Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.3390/hematolrep16040055
Michelangelo Sartori, Miriam Fiocca, Mario Soldati, Laura Borgese, Elisabetta Favaretto, Benilde Cosmi
{"title":"帕多瓦预测评分与无症状患者在医院获得的近端和孤立远端深静脉血栓。","authors":"Michelangelo Sartori, Miriam Fiocca, Mario Soldati, Laura Borgese, Elisabetta Favaretto, Benilde Cosmi","doi":"10.3390/hematolrep16040055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of proximal lower limb DVT and isolated distal DVT (IDDVT) and their relationship to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) in acutely ill, hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center cross-sectional study, all inpatients from medical departments with suspected lower-extremity DVT were evaluated with whole-leg ultrasonography during 183 days from 2016 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 505 inpatients (age 78.0 ± 13.3, females 59.2%) from medical departments, 204 (40.2%) had PPS ≥ 4, but only 54.4% of them underwent pharmacological thrombo-prophylaxis. Whole-leg ultrasonography detected 47 proximal DVTs (9.3%) and 65 IDDVTs (12.8%). Proximal DVT prevalence was higher in patients with high PPS vs. those with low PPS (12.7% vs. 7.0% <i>p</i> = 0.029, respectively), whereas IDDVT prevalence was similar in patients with high and low PPS (14.7% vs. 11.6% <i>p</i> = 0.311, respectively). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the PPS was 0.62 ± 0.03 for all DVTs, 0.64 ± 0.04 for proximal DVTs, and 0.58 ± 0.04 for IDDVTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In hospitalized patients, IDDVT had similar prevalence regardless of PPS risk stratification. Adherence to thrombo-prophylaxis in patients was still far from optimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":12829,"journal":{"name":"Hematology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Padua Prediction Score and Hospital-Acquired Proximal and Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis in Symptomatic Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Michelangelo Sartori, Miriam Fiocca, Mario Soldati, Laura Borgese, Elisabetta Favaretto, Benilde Cosmi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/hematolrep16040055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of proximal lower limb DVT and isolated distal DVT (IDDVT) and their relationship to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) in acutely ill, hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center cross-sectional study, all inpatients from medical departments with suspected lower-extremity DVT were evaluated with whole-leg ultrasonography during 183 days from 2016 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 505 inpatients (age 78.0 ± 13.3, females 59.2%) from medical departments, 204 (40.2%) had PPS ≥ 4, but only 54.4% of them underwent pharmacological thrombo-prophylaxis. Whole-leg ultrasonography detected 47 proximal DVTs (9.3%) and 65 IDDVTs (12.8%). Proximal DVT prevalence was higher in patients with high PPS vs. those with low PPS (12.7% vs. 7.0% <i>p</i> = 0.029, respectively), whereas IDDVT prevalence was similar in patients with high and low PPS (14.7% vs. 11.6% <i>p</i> = 0.311, respectively). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the PPS was 0.62 ± 0.03 for all DVTs, 0.64 ± 0.04 for proximal DVTs, and 0.58 ± 0.04 for IDDVTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In hospitalized patients, IDDVT had similar prevalence regardless of PPS risk stratification. Adherence to thrombo-prophylaxis in patients was still far from optimal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep16040055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep16040055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医院获得性深静脉血栓(DVT)是发病和死亡的重要原因:医院获得性深静脉血栓(DVT)是发病和死亡的重要原因:本研究旨在评估急性住院患者下肢近端深静脉血栓和孤立远端深静脉血栓(IDDVT)的发病率及其与帕多瓦预测评分(PPS)的关系:在一项单中心横断面研究中,在2016年至2017年的183天内,对内科所有疑似下肢深静脉血栓的住院患者进行了全腿超声评估:在 505 名内科住院患者(年龄 78.0 ± 13.3,女性 59.2%)中,204 人(40.2%)的 PPS ≥ 4,但只有 54.4%的患者接受了药物血栓预防治疗。全腿超声波检查发现了 47 例近端深静脉血栓(9.3%)和 65 例 IDDVT(12.8%)。高 PPS 患者的近端深静脉血栓发生率高于低 PPS 患者(分别为 12.7% 对 7.0% p = 0.029),而高 PPS 患者和低 PPS 患者的 IDDVT 发生率相似(分别为 14.7% 对 11.6% p = 0.311)。所有深静脉血栓的PPS接收者操作曲线下面积(AUC)为0.62 ± 0.03,近端深静脉血栓为0.64 ± 0.04,IDDVT为0.58 ± 0.04:结论:在住院患者中,无论PPS风险分层如何,IDDVT的发病率都相似。结论:在住院患者中,无论PPS风险分层如何,IDDVT的发病率都很接近,患者对血栓预防的依从性仍远未达到最佳水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Padua Prediction Score and Hospital-Acquired Proximal and Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis in Symptomatic Patients.

Background: Hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of proximal lower limb DVT and isolated distal DVT (IDDVT) and their relationship to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) in acutely ill, hospitalized patients.

Methods: In a single-center cross-sectional study, all inpatients from medical departments with suspected lower-extremity DVT were evaluated with whole-leg ultrasonography during 183 days from 2016 to 2017.

Results: Among the 505 inpatients (age 78.0 ± 13.3, females 59.2%) from medical departments, 204 (40.2%) had PPS ≥ 4, but only 54.4% of them underwent pharmacological thrombo-prophylaxis. Whole-leg ultrasonography detected 47 proximal DVTs (9.3%) and 65 IDDVTs (12.8%). Proximal DVT prevalence was higher in patients with high PPS vs. those with low PPS (12.7% vs. 7.0% p = 0.029, respectively), whereas IDDVT prevalence was similar in patients with high and low PPS (14.7% vs. 11.6% p = 0.311, respectively). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the PPS was 0.62 ± 0.03 for all DVTs, 0.64 ± 0.04 for proximal DVTs, and 0.58 ± 0.04 for IDDVTs.

Conclusions: In hospitalized patients, IDDVT had similar prevalence regardless of PPS risk stratification. Adherence to thrombo-prophylaxis in patients was still far from optimal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hematology Reports
Hematology Reports HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gene Therapy: A Revolutionary Step in Treating Thalassemia. Pancytopenia Related to Splenic Angiosarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review. Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of a Single-Center Study. Trabecular Attenuation of L1 in Adult Patients with Multiple Myeloma: An Observational Study on Low-Dose CT Images. Utilizing Clinical Transformation Criteria for Prognostic Stratification in Follicular Lymphoma Prior to Initial Immunochemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1