对 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后患者对远程医疗和实体咨询的结果和满意度的描述性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-26 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_2020_23
Ronak Asodariya, Kavita R Bhatnagar, Kirti Jaisingh, Manjari Tandon, Latika Pandey, Nikhil Agrawal, Sanjeev Misra
{"title":"对 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后患者对远程医疗和实体咨询的结果和满意度的描述性研究。","authors":"Ronak Asodariya, Kavita R Bhatnagar, Kirti Jaisingh, Manjari Tandon, Latika Pandey, Nikhil Agrawal, Sanjeev Misra","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_2020_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to assess patients' outcome and satisfaction with the eye care received with telemedicine and physical consultation at a tertiary care hospital during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive study was carried out on 6052 patients who consulted for eye illness at a tertiary care hospital between April 2020 and December 2022. An outcome scoring system was developed and validated for the assessment of patient outcome after providing treatment on telemedicine consultation and physical consultation. Outcome scores for various symptoms were compared pretreatment and posttreatment. Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) was used through an online survey to assess patients' satisfaction with teleophthalmology services during the COVID-19 pandemic. An 18-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18) was used to assess the same with physical consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6052 patients were included in the study. Physical consultation group had 2485 patients (41.06%) and the telemedicine group had 3567 patients (58.93%). Male patients constituted 63.11% and females were 36.89%. There was a significant improvement in outcome scores for pain and redness in both physical and telemedicine consultation groups (P < 0.0001). All subgroups of TUQ had significantly high scores (including usefulness, ease of use and learnability, interface quality, interaction quality, and satisfaction and future use), except one subgroup (reliability). Uneducated patients were significantly more satisfied with telemedicine compared to educated patients (P = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of patients expressed satisfaction with teleophthalmology services. The recent pandemic paved the way for the future integration of telemedicine in ophthalmology, especially if virtual eye examinations attain a higher level of reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Descriptive study of patient outcome and satisfaction with telemedicine and physical consultation during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Ronak Asodariya, Kavita R Bhatnagar, Kirti Jaisingh, Manjari Tandon, Latika Pandey, Nikhil Agrawal, Sanjeev Misra\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/IJO.IJO_2020_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to assess patients' outcome and satisfaction with the eye care received with telemedicine and physical consultation at a tertiary care hospital during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive study was carried out on 6052 patients who consulted for eye illness at a tertiary care hospital between April 2020 and December 2022. An outcome scoring system was developed and validated for the assessment of patient outcome after providing treatment on telemedicine consultation and physical consultation. Outcome scores for various symptoms were compared pretreatment and posttreatment. Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) was used through an online survey to assess patients' satisfaction with teleophthalmology services during the COVID-19 pandemic. An 18-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18) was used to assess the same with physical consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6052 patients were included in the study. Physical consultation group had 2485 patients (41.06%) and the telemedicine group had 3567 patients (58.93%). Male patients constituted 63.11% and females were 36.89%. There was a significant improvement in outcome scores for pain and redness in both physical and telemedicine consultation groups (P < 0.0001). All subgroups of TUQ had significantly high scores (including usefulness, ease of use and learnability, interface quality, interaction quality, and satisfaction and future use), except one subgroup (reliability). Uneducated patients were significantly more satisfied with telemedicine compared to educated patients (P = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of patients expressed satisfaction with teleophthalmology services. The recent pandemic paved the way for the future integration of telemedicine in ophthalmology, especially if virtual eye examinations attain a higher level of reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2020_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2020_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估患者在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间和之后在一家三级医院接受远程医疗和物理会诊眼科护理的结果和满意度:对2020年4月至2022年12月期间在一家三级医院就诊的6052名眼疾患者进行了描述性研究。研究开发并验证了一套结果评分系统,用于评估患者在接受远程医疗会诊和物理会诊治疗后的结果。对治疗前和治疗后各种症状的结果评分进行了比较。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,通过在线调查使用了远程医疗可用性问卷 (TUQ),以评估患者对远程眼科服务的满意度。此外,还使用了 18 项患者满意度问卷(PSQ-18)来评估患者对实体诊疗的满意度:研究共纳入了 6052 名患者。实体就诊组有 2485 名患者(41.06%),远程医疗组有 3567 名患者(58.93%)。男性患者占 63.11%,女性患者占 36.89%。物理诊疗组和远程医疗诊疗组的疼痛和发红结果评分均有明显改善(P < 0.0001)。除一个子组(可靠性)外,TUQ 的所有子组(包括有用性、易用性和可学习性、界面质量、交互质量、满意度和未来使用)都有明显的高分。与受过教育的患者相比,未受过教育的患者对远程医疗的满意度明显更高(P = 0.044):大多数患者对远程眼科服务表示满意。结论:大多数患者对远程眼科服务表示满意,最近的大流行为今后将远程医疗融入眼科铺平了道路,尤其是在虚拟眼科检查达到更高可靠性的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Descriptive study of patient outcome and satisfaction with telemedicine and physical consultation during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Purpose: This study was conducted to assess patients' outcome and satisfaction with the eye care received with telemedicine and physical consultation at a tertiary care hospital during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Methods: A descriptive study was carried out on 6052 patients who consulted for eye illness at a tertiary care hospital between April 2020 and December 2022. An outcome scoring system was developed and validated for the assessment of patient outcome after providing treatment on telemedicine consultation and physical consultation. Outcome scores for various symptoms were compared pretreatment and posttreatment. Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) was used through an online survey to assess patients' satisfaction with teleophthalmology services during the COVID-19 pandemic. An 18-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18) was used to assess the same with physical consultation.

Results: A total of 6052 patients were included in the study. Physical consultation group had 2485 patients (41.06%) and the telemedicine group had 3567 patients (58.93%). Male patients constituted 63.11% and females were 36.89%. There was a significant improvement in outcome scores for pain and redness in both physical and telemedicine consultation groups (P < 0.0001). All subgroups of TUQ had significantly high scores (including usefulness, ease of use and learnability, interface quality, interaction quality, and satisfaction and future use), except one subgroup (reliability). Uneducated patients were significantly more satisfied with telemedicine compared to educated patients (P = 0.044).

Conclusion: Majority of patients expressed satisfaction with teleophthalmology services. The recent pandemic paved the way for the future integration of telemedicine in ophthalmology, especially if virtual eye examinations attain a higher level of reliability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
Association between gut microbiota and central retinal artery occlusion: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Clinical outcomes of topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized LASIK for correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. Accuracy of Intraocular lens power calculation in pediatric traumatic cataract. Alterations in the tear film and ocular surface in pediatric migraine patients. Guidelines for setting up low-vision and rehabilitation services in India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1