G S Karthik, Rangalakshmi Srinivasan, R Sudheer, M Amabareesha, T S Monisha, M Dilip Kumar
{"title":"胸椎麻醉--乳房手术中全身麻醉的有效替代方案:随机非盲研究。","authors":"G S Karthik, Rangalakshmi Srinivasan, R Sudheer, M Amabareesha, T S Monisha, M Dilip Kumar","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_629_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>General anaesthesia (GA) is the preferred modality for breast surgeries; however, neuraxial anaesthesia can be performed in cases where GA poses a significant risk. We hypothesise that neuraxial blockade is a safe and effective alternative to GA in short-duration breast surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised study included 30 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, who were scheduled for elective breast surgeries of a duration of less than 90 min. Group I received thoracic spinal anaesthesia, while in Group II, standardised GA was administered. The primary outcome was the time to the first rescue analgesic, and the secondary outcomes were time to recovery, patient satisfaction and the cost incurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic characteristics of both groups were comparable (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The time to first rescue analgesic in Group I was more than in Group II (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Patient satisfaction score was superior in Group I compared to Group II (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The average cost was lower in Group I compared to Group II (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Recovery was quicker in Group I than in Group II (<i>P</i> = 0.001). There were no significant haemodynamic disturbances or major complications in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic spinal anaesthesia is an excellent alternative to GA in terms of analgesic efficacy, patient satisfaction, recovery and cost-effectiveness for short-duration breast surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11498257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracic spinal anaesthesia - An effective alternative to general anaesthesia in breast surgeries: A randomised, non-blinded study.\",\"authors\":\"G S Karthik, Rangalakshmi Srinivasan, R Sudheer, M Amabareesha, T S Monisha, M Dilip Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_629_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>General anaesthesia (GA) is the preferred modality for breast surgeries; however, neuraxial anaesthesia can be performed in cases where GA poses a significant risk. We hypothesise that neuraxial blockade is a safe and effective alternative to GA in short-duration breast surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised study included 30 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, who were scheduled for elective breast surgeries of a duration of less than 90 min. Group I received thoracic spinal anaesthesia, while in Group II, standardised GA was administered. The primary outcome was the time to the first rescue analgesic, and the secondary outcomes were time to recovery, patient satisfaction and the cost incurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic characteristics of both groups were comparable (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The time to first rescue analgesic in Group I was more than in Group II (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Patient satisfaction score was superior in Group I compared to Group II (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The average cost was lower in Group I compared to Group II (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Recovery was quicker in Group I than in Group II (<i>P</i> = 0.001). There were no significant haemodynamic disturbances or major complications in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic spinal anaesthesia is an excellent alternative to GA in terms of analgesic efficacy, patient satisfaction, recovery and cost-effectiveness for short-duration breast surgeries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11498257/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_629_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_629_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:全身麻醉(GA)是乳房手术的首选方式;然而,神经轴麻醉可在GA构成重大风险的病例中实施。我们假设神经阻滞在短时乳房手术中是一种安全有效的替代GA的方法:这项随机研究纳入了 30 名美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 I 级和 II 级的患者,他们都计划接受持续时间少于 90 分钟的择期乳房手术。第一组接受胸椎麻醉,而第二组则实施标准化的GA。主要结果是首次使用镇痛药的时间,次要结果是恢复时间、患者满意度和产生的费用:两组的人口统计学特征具有可比性(P > 0.05)。第一组患者首次使用镇痛药的时间长于第二组(P = 0.001)。第一组患者的满意度评分高于第二组(P = 0.002)。第一组的平均费用低于第二组(P = 0.002)。第一组比第二组恢复更快(P = 0.001)。两组均未出现明显的血流动力学紊乱或重大并发症:结论:就短期乳房手术的镇痛效果、患者满意度、恢复和成本效益而言,胸椎麻醉是GA的最佳替代方案。
Thoracic spinal anaesthesia - An effective alternative to general anaesthesia in breast surgeries: A randomised, non-blinded study.
Background and aims: General anaesthesia (GA) is the preferred modality for breast surgeries; however, neuraxial anaesthesia can be performed in cases where GA poses a significant risk. We hypothesise that neuraxial blockade is a safe and effective alternative to GA in short-duration breast surgeries.
Methods: This randomised study included 30 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, who were scheduled for elective breast surgeries of a duration of less than 90 min. Group I received thoracic spinal anaesthesia, while in Group II, standardised GA was administered. The primary outcome was the time to the first rescue analgesic, and the secondary outcomes were time to recovery, patient satisfaction and the cost incurred.
Results: The demographic characteristics of both groups were comparable (P > 0.05). The time to first rescue analgesic in Group I was more than in Group II (P = 0.001). Patient satisfaction score was superior in Group I compared to Group II (P = 0.002). The average cost was lower in Group I compared to Group II (P = 0.002). Recovery was quicker in Group I than in Group II (P = 0.001). There were no significant haemodynamic disturbances or major complications in either group.
Conclusion: Thoracic spinal anaesthesia is an excellent alternative to GA in terms of analgesic efficacy, patient satisfaction, recovery and cost-effectiveness for short-duration breast surgeries.