估算人工耳蜗用户电荷整合效率的新客观方法。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2417243
Palani Saravanan, Jawahar Antony P, Megha, Chinnaraj Geetha, Puttabasappa Manjula
{"title":"估算人工耳蜗用户电荷整合效率的新客观方法。","authors":"Palani Saravanan, Jawahar Antony P, Megha, Chinnaraj Geetha, Puttabasappa Manjula","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2417243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to objectively assess the charge integration efficiency (CIE) of the auditory nerve using electrically-evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT) measurements in paediatric cochlear implant users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The eSRT was estimated in two ways: by keeping pulse width constant while increasing pulse amplitude and vice versa. The electrical dynamic range (EDR) obtained for eSRT was measured with increasing pulse amplitude (EDR<sub>PA</sub>) and pulse width (EDR<sub>PW</sub>) by calculating the difference in charge units between eSRT and behavioural thresholds; further, CIE was estimated.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Fifteen paediatric cochlear implant users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EDR<sub>PW</sub> was 1.4 to 1.7 times larger than EDR<sub>PA</sub>. The EDR<sub>PW</sub> was significantly greater than the EDR<sub>PA</sub>. A significant correlation was observed between both EDR measures. However, the CIE measure did not significantly correlate with the behavioural threshold. Further, there was no significant effect of electrode location on the CIE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CIE estimated with objective measures such as eSRT is comparable to those estimated using behavioural loudness judgments. eSRT can serve as a quick method to estimate the CIE, which can be easily implemented in the paediatric population. The CIE could be a valuable tool for differentiating electrodes with excellent and poor charge integration efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new objective method to estimate the charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users.\",\"authors\":\"Palani Saravanan, Jawahar Antony P, Megha, Chinnaraj Geetha, Puttabasappa Manjula\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2024.2417243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to objectively assess the charge integration efficiency (CIE) of the auditory nerve using electrically-evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT) measurements in paediatric cochlear implant users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The eSRT was estimated in two ways: by keeping pulse width constant while increasing pulse amplitude and vice versa. The electrical dynamic range (EDR) obtained for eSRT was measured with increasing pulse amplitude (EDR<sub>PA</sub>) and pulse width (EDR<sub>PW</sub>) by calculating the difference in charge units between eSRT and behavioural thresholds; further, CIE was estimated.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Fifteen paediatric cochlear implant users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EDR<sub>PW</sub> was 1.4 to 1.7 times larger than EDR<sub>PA</sub>. The EDR<sub>PW</sub> was significantly greater than the EDR<sub>PA</sub>. A significant correlation was observed between both EDR measures. However, the CIE measure did not significantly correlate with the behavioural threshold. Further, there was no significant effect of electrode location on the CIE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CIE estimated with objective measures such as eSRT is comparable to those estimated using behavioural loudness judgments. eSRT can serve as a quick method to estimate the CIE, which can be easily implemented in the paediatric population. The CIE could be a valuable tool for differentiating electrodes with excellent and poor charge integration efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2417243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2417243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在通过对小儿人工耳蜗使用者进行电诱发镫骨反射阈值(eSRT)测量,客观评估听神经的电荷整合效率(CIE):设计:通过两种方法估算 eSRT:保持脉冲宽度不变,同时增加脉冲振幅,反之亦然。通过计算 eSRT 和行为阈值之间的电荷单位差异,测量 eSRT 在脉冲振幅(EDRPA)和脉冲宽度(EDRPW)增加时获得的电动态范围(EDR);此外,还估算了 CIE:研究样本:15 名儿童人工耳蜗用户:结果:EDRPW 是 EDRPA 的 1.4 至 1.7 倍。EDRPW 明显大于 EDRPA。两种 EDR 测量之间存在明显的相关性。然而,CIE 测量与行为阈值没有明显的相关性。此外,电极位置对 CIE 没有明显影响:使用 eSRT 等客观测量方法估算的 CIE 与使用行为响度判断估算的 CIE 相当。CIE 可以作为区分电荷整合效率优劣电极的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new objective method to estimate the charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users.

Objective: The present study aimed to objectively assess the charge integration efficiency (CIE) of the auditory nerve using electrically-evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT) measurements in paediatric cochlear implant users.

Design: The eSRT was estimated in two ways: by keeping pulse width constant while increasing pulse amplitude and vice versa. The electrical dynamic range (EDR) obtained for eSRT was measured with increasing pulse amplitude (EDRPA) and pulse width (EDRPW) by calculating the difference in charge units between eSRT and behavioural thresholds; further, CIE was estimated.

Study sample: Fifteen paediatric cochlear implant users.

Results: EDRPW was 1.4 to 1.7 times larger than EDRPA. The EDRPW was significantly greater than the EDRPA. A significant correlation was observed between both EDR measures. However, the CIE measure did not significantly correlate with the behavioural threshold. Further, there was no significant effect of electrode location on the CIE.

Conclusions: The CIE estimated with objective measures such as eSRT is comparable to those estimated using behavioural loudness judgments. eSRT can serve as a quick method to estimate the CIE, which can be easily implemented in the paediatric population. The CIE could be a valuable tool for differentiating electrodes with excellent and poor charge integration efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
The influence of age and hearing loss on thresholds measured using the TFS-AF test. Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing. "Can physical activity reduce the risk of having tinnitus?" Risky leisure noise exposure during the transition to adulthood and the impact of major life events - results of the OHRKAN cohort study. Applications of automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies for hearing assessment: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1